Advertisement

Volume-Based Measurement Testing for Patients with Increased Rectal Volumes

  • Levent FilikEmail author
Correspondence

Dear Sirs,

In the innovative study by Verkuijl, the authors addressed the question as to whether altered volume thresholds in actuality translate to altered sensitivity [1]. They state that the larger rectal capacity leads to a larger balloon volume required to achieve a sensitivity threshold without a pressure sensitivity alteration that shows constant sensation was different in the similar rectal pressure. It is speculative to reach this conclusion without normative data from their laboratory. The sensory thresholds change among laboratories and are dependent on the features of the balloon. Accordingly, we all know that the interpretation of the rectal sensory data must be evaluated along with the rectal compliance data [2]. Rectal hyposensivity is defined as diminished perception of rectal distention for at least two modalities such as urge sensation and maximal tolerable volume. Otherwise, we cannot eliminate the confounding factors such as diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome or...

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Verkuijl SJ, Trzpis M, Broens PMA. Normal rectal filling sensations in patients with an enlarged rectum. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1312–1319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0731-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnett JL, Hasler WL, Camilleri M. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. Gastronterology. 1999;116:732–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:232–240.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bannister JJ, Abouzekry L, Read NW. Effect of aging on anorectal function. Gut. 1987;28:353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broens PM, Penninckx FM, Lestár B, Kerremans RP. The trigger for rectal filling sensation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broens PMA, Jonker JE, Trzpis M. The puborectal continence reflex: a new regulatory mechanism controlling fecal continence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3023-9..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whitehead WE, Delvaux M. Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:223–241.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000068361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gastroenterology Clinic, Ankara Research HospitalHealth Sciences UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations