Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 64, Issue 10, pp 2776–2779 | Cite as

Basket Case: Fluoroscopy-Free Capture and Retrieval of Biliary and Pancreatic Duct Stones

  • Monique T. Barakat
  • Subhas BanerjeeEmail author
Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars
  • 33 Downloads

Case Presentations and Evolution

Case 1

A 72-year-old woman was evaluated for severe epigastric pain associated with nausea and diaphoresis. Her past medical history was significant for cholecystectomy 3 years previously and multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures for the management of recurrent choledocholithiasis. Vital signs were notable for a heart rate of 79 beats/min, temperature of 37.1 °C, blood pressure of 96/69 mm of Hg, and respiratory rate of 16/min. Physical examination revealed mild right upper quadrant tenderness, without other abnormality. Laboratory studies included normal total bilirubin (0.7 mg/dL), AST 48 U/L (normal < 40), ALT 59 U/L (normal < 60), and alkaline phosphatase 179 U/L (normal 40–130). Imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography again indicated choledocholithiasis, with marked dilation of the common bile duct to 2.4 cm. ERCP performed with anesthesia support revealed a large peri-ampullary diverticulum, a...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest pertaining to the study to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Buxbaum J, Sahakian A, Ko C, et al. Randomized trial of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy versus conventional therapy for large bile duct stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1050–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S, et al. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 2005;37:542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attwell AR, Brauer BC, Chen YK, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with per oral pancreatoscopy for calcific chronic pancreatitis using endoscope and catheter-based pancreatoscopes: a 10-year single-center experience. Pancreas. 2014;43:268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaffe D, Bowden GT. Ionizing radiation as an initiator: effects of proliferation and promotion time on tumor incidence in mice. Cancer Res. 1987;47:6692–6696.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, et al. Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). BMJ. 2015;351:h5359.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barakat MT, Thosani NC, Huang RJ, et al. Effects of a brief educational program on optimization of fluoroscopy to minimize radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adler DG, Lieb JG 2nd, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adler DG, Lieb JG 2nd, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barakat MT, Girotra M, Choudhary A, et al. A prospective evaluation of radiation-free direct solitary cholangioscopy for the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:e1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations