Advertisement

Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Assessing and Grading Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn’s Disease

  • María Jesús Martínez
  • Tomás Ripollés
  • Jose María Paredes
  • Eduardo Moreno-Osset
  • Juan Manuel Pazos
  • Esther Blanc
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to investigate the contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to improve the results of US in the evaluation of recurrence in postsurgical Crohn’s disease (CD) and establish its role in the assessment of the severity.

Methods

Anastomotic site was assessed in 108 postsurgical CD patients with B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS. Bowel wall thickness (WT), transmural complications or stenosis, color Doppler grade, and bowel wall contrast enhancement (BWCE)—using time–intensity curves—were correlated with endoscopic Rutgeerts score. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was built to establish the best cutoff to predict recurrence and the severity. A US scoring system was elaborated in order to determine the grade of recurrence.

Results

Ileocolonoscopy detected recurrence in 90 (83.3%) subjects and severe recurrence in 62. WT ≥ 3 mm had an accuracy of 90.7% in the detection of endoscopic recurrence. The combination of parameters—WT ≥ 3 mm and BWCE (≥ 46%)—demonstrated similar accuracy (90.7%). A WT ≥ 5 mm showed the best specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of recurrence and a WT ≥ 6 mm the best specificity (95.7%) for the detection of severe recurrence. The combination of sonographic parameters—WT ≥ 6 mm or WT between 5 and 6 mm with BWCE ≥ 70%, or complications—obtained the best results grading the recurrence (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90.3%, 87%, and 88.9%, respectively).

Conclusions

US shows high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of postsurgical recurrence. When combined with CEUS, it can improve the detection of severe recurrence.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease Postsurgical recurrence Bowel sonography Contrast-enhanced ultrasound 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M. Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:956–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olaison G, Smedh K, Sjodahl R. Natural course of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: endoscopically visualised ileal ulcers preceding symptoms. Gut. 1992;33:331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Kerremans R, Coenegrachts JL, Coremans G. Natural history of recurrent Crohn’s disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut. 1984;25:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Assche G, Dignass A, Reinisch W, et al. The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: Special situations. J Crohn’s Colitis [Internet]. 2010;4:63–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: A population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2297–2303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biancone L, Onali S, Calabrese E, et al. Non-invasive techniques for assessing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:S265–S270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Cruz P, Kamm MA, Prideaux L, Allen PB, Desmond PV. Postoperative recurrent luminal Crohn’s disease: A systematic review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:758–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamamoto T. Diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;9:55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marteau P, Laharie D, Colombel J-F, et al. Inter-observer variation study of the Rutgeerts score to assess endoscopic recurrence after surgery for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1001–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paredes JM, Ripollés T, Cortés X, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis and grading of postsurgical endoscopic recurrence in Crohn’s disease: usefulness of abdominal ultrasonography and 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene amineoxime-labelled leucocyte scintigraphy. J Crohn’s Colitis [Internet]. 2010;4:537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rispo A, Bucci L, Pesce G, et al. Bowel onography for the diagnosis and grading of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:486–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Poloni G, Guidi L, De Vitis I, Bonomo L. Enteroclysis CT and PEG-CT in patients with previous small-bowel surgical resection for Crohn’s disease: CT findings and correlation with endoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2432–2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Sirol M, et al. Suspected anastomotic recurrence of crohn disease after ileocolic resection: Evaluation with CT enteroclysis. Radiology. 2010;254:755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi IY, Park SH, Park SH, et al. CT Enterography for surveillance of anastomotic recurrence within 12 months of bowel resection in Patients with Crohn’ s disease: an observational study using an 8-year registry. Gastrointest Imaging. 2017;18:906–914.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sailer J, Peloschek P, Reinisch W, Vogelsang H, Turetschek K, Schima W. Anastomotic recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: Comparison of MR enteroclysis with endoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2512–2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koilakou S, Sailer J, Peloschek P, et al. Endoscopy and MR enteroclysis: Equivalent tools in predicting clinical recurrence in patients with Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gallego Ojea JC, Echarri Piudo AI, Porta Vila A. Enfermedad de Crohn: Utilidad de la RM-enterografía en la detección de recurrencias posquirúrgicas. Radiologia. 2011;53:552–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castiglione F, Bucci L, Pesce G, et al. Oral contrast-enhanced sonography for the diagnosis and grading of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1240–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, Onali S, et al. Severity of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: Correlation between endoscopic and sonographic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1635–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pallotta N, Giovannone M, Pezzotti P, et al. Ultrasonographic detection and assessment of the severity of Crohn’s disease recurrence after ileal resection. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Onali S, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, et al. Endoscopic vs ultrasonographic findings related to Crohn’s disease recurrence: A prospective longitudinal study at 3 years. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2010;4:319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calabrese E, Maaser C, Zorzi F, Kannengiesser K, Hanauer SB, Bruining DH et al. Bowel ultrasonography in the management of Crohn’s disease. A review with recommendations of an international panel of experts. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1168–1183.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Domènech E, López-Sanromán A, Nos P, et al. Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre la monitorización, prevención y tratamiento de la recurrencia posquirúrgica en la enfermedad de Crohn. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;40:472–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gallego JC, Echarri AI, Porta A, Ollero V. Ileal Crohn’s disease: MRI with endoscopic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ma X, Li Y, Jia H, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having active Crohn’s disease: meta-analysis. Ultrasound Clin. 2015;41:659–668.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paredes J, Ripollés T, Cortés X, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: usefulness in the assessment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989;170:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F. Development of a Crohn’s disease activity index. National cooperative Crohn’s disease study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:439–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron M-C, et al. Doppler US in patients with Crohn disease: Vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology. 2000;217:787–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P, et al. Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: Clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic evaluation of histological features. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:749–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ripollés T, Rausell N, Paredes JM, Grau E, Martínez MJ, Vizuete J. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease: A comparison with surgical histopathology analysis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ripollés T, Paredes JM, Martínez-Pérez MJ, et al. Ultrasonographic changes at 12 weeks of anti-TNF drugs Predict 1-year sonographic response and clinical outcome in Crohn’s disease: A multicenter study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:2465–2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paredes JM, Ripollés T, Cortés X, et al. Abdominal sonographic changes after antibody to tumor necrosis factor (Anti-TNF) alpha therapy in crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:404–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, Paredes JM, Blanc E, Flors L, Delgado F. Crohn disease: Correlation of findings at contrast-enhanced US with severity at endoscopy. Radiology [Internet]. 2009;253:241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gareen IF, Gatsonis C. Primer on multiple regression models for diagnostic imaging research. Radiology. 2003;229:305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andreoli A, Cerro P, Falasco G, Giglio LA, Prantera C. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1117–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Biancone L, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy and small intestine contrast ultrasonography in recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1256–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Orlando A, Mocciaro F, Renna S, et al. Early post-operative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn’s disease patients: Data from an Italian Group for the study of inflammatory bowel disease (IG-IBD) study on a large prospective multicenter cohort. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2014;8:1217–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pauls S, Gabelmann A, Schmidt SA, et al. Evaluating bowel wall vascularity in Crohn’s disease: A comparison of dynamic MRI and wideband harmonic imaging contrast-enhanced low MI ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2410–2417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Robotti D, Cammarota T, Debani P, Sarno A, Astegiano M. Activity of Crohn disease: Value of color-power-Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Quaia E. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Der Med. 2012;33:33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Franco A, Di Veronica A, Armuzzi A, Roberto I, Marzo M, De Pascalis B et al. Ileal Crohn disease: mural microvascularity quantified with contrast-enhanced US correlates with disease activity. Radiology. 2012;262:680–688.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ripollés T, Martínez-Pérez MJ, Blanc E, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn’s disease: technique, image interpretation and clinical applications. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rispo A, Imperatore N, Tesla A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the detection of postsurgical recurrence in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moreno N, Ripollés T, Paredes JM, et al. Usefulness of abdominal ultrasonography in the analysis of endoscopic activity in patients with Crohn’s disease: Changes following treatment with immunomodulators and/or anti-TNF antibodies. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2014;8:1079–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mao R, Gao X, Zhu Z, et al. CT enterography in evaluating postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: complementary role to endoscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    De Cruz P, Kamm MA, Hamilton AL, et al. Crohn’s disease management after intestinal resection: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1406–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fraquelli M, Sarno A, Girelli C, et al. Reproducibility of bowel ultrasonography in the evaluation of Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:860–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyDr. Peset Universitary HospitalValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyDr. Peset Universitary HospitalValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations