Optimization of macrophage isolation from the Persian sturgeon and the Caspian kutum fish: a comparative study
- 78 Downloads
The aim of this research was a comparative study on the isolation and culture of head kidney macrophages derived from Acipenser persicous and Rutilus frisii kutum as teleost and chondrostei species of fish. The macrophages were isolated by density gradient sedimentation, followed by adherence to a plastic surface. They exhibited strong phagocytic activity against bacteria. The effect of cell density, incubation time, FBS percentage, pH and temperatures on the cell number and viability were determined and compared. Also, the effect of light/dark regimen on viability, adherence, release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) in the macrophages was determined. The results showed that the Caspian kutum macrophages were more sensitive to FBS percentage and cell density whereas the Persian sturgeon macrophages were more sensitive to pH of the cell culture media. The adherence and viability of the macrophages from both fish species firstly increased (P < 0.05) after exposure to a light/dark regimen, but then significantly decreased as did ROS and NO productions. For the first time, this study has determined the optimal conditions for primary culture of macrophages derived from sturgeons, and shows the unique effect of light on the biology of fish immune cells.
KeywordsFish macrophages Light exposure Primary culture
The author thanks Professor Christopher Secombes, Head of the Scottish Fish Immunology Research Centre at University of Aberdeen, and also Dr. Rashid Alijani Ardeshir for helping on experimental work and edition on the manuscript, and also Babol University of Medical Sciences for providing instruments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no potential or actual conflicts of interest.
- Ahmadian E, Malekzadeh-Viayeh R, Zahmatkesh A (2015) Caspian whitefish, Rutilus frisii kutum Kamensky, 1901 a potential aquaculture candidate: study on the cumulative effects of salinity and temperature on culture performance. Iran J Fish Sci 14:623–633Google Scholar
- Badhe MR, Nandanpawar PC (1991) An overview of cell culture in fish. Aquatic Fish Database est. http://aquafind.com/articles/Cell-Culture-In-Fish.php
- Chebanov MS, Galich EV (2011) Sturgeon hatchery manual, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper no 558, XXXII, 303 pp (ISBN 978-92-5-106823-6)Google Scholar
- Clem LW, Miller NW, Bly JE (1991) Evolution of lymphocyte subpopulations, their interactions, and temperature sensitivities. In: Warr GW, Cohen N (eds) Phylogenesis of immune functions, pp 191–213Google Scholar
- Freshney RI (1994) Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York, pp 71–103Google Scholar
- Gordon S, Lawson L, Rabinowitz S, Crocker P, Morris L, Perry V (1992) Antigen markers of macrophage differentiation in murine tissues. In: Russell SW, Gordon S (eds) Macrophage biology and activation. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–37Google Scholar
- Lannan C (1994) Fish cell culture: a protocol for quality control. Methods Cell Sci 16:95–98Google Scholar
- Secombes C (1990) Fish immunology technical communications. Salmonid macrophages and analysis of their killing activity. SOS Publications, Fair HavenGoogle Scholar