Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 17–22 | Cite as

Paddling Against the Tide: Contemporary Challenges in Field Education

  • Melinda GushwaEmail author
  • Kim Harriman
Original Paper


In casual conversations among social work field and teaching faculty, topics seem to consistently default to its many challenges. From unprofessional behavior to lack of readiness to unrealistic expectations for placements to poor fit and lack of availability of quality placements, explanations range from the internet, the economy, an over-taxed voluntary workforce of field supervisors, and overextended programs and agencies. This paper seeks to shed light on some of these “water cooler” conversations and examines the truth (and consequences) of these assumptions via an exploration of data and literature, an analysis of recent articles in the Field Educator journal, and the musings of two directors (one field and one program) regarding our ethical obligations to our students and the profession at large. During a 6-year period, articles in the Field Educator clustered around the following topics: field pedagogy/field instructors, innovative approaches to finding/expanding field placements, evaluation and assessment of field, issues in field/gatekeeping, student preparedness and culture/diversity. With social work programs growing at a fast rate and field site agencies often grappling with tightening budgets and an overtaxed workforce, what should social work education be doing to ensure that we are attending to multiple competing factors that have an impact on our pursuit of providing high quality experiences for our students and communities? This paper provides some food for thought, and encourages continued conversation as our profession and our educational programs evolve.


Field education Field challenges Signature pedagogy 


  1. Ayala, J., Drolet, J., Fulton, A., Hewson, J., Letkemann, L., Baynton, M., et al. (2017). Field education in crisis: experiences of field education coordinators in Canada. Social Work Education, 37(3), 281–293. Scholar
  2. Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in the ‘risk society. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1279–1296. Scholar
  3. Beddoe, L., & Davis, A. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision: Current themes and models for practice. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bogo, M. (2015). Field education for clinical social work practice: Best practices and contemporary challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43, 317–324. Scholar
  5. Cohen, B.-Z., & Laufer, H. (1999). The influence of supervision on social workers’ perceptions of their professional competence. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 39–50. Scholar
  6. Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from
  7. Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from
  8. Council on Social Work Education (2016). Annual statistics on social work education in the United States. Retrieved from
  9. Domakin, A. (2013). Are we making the most of learning from the practice placement? Social Work Education, 33(6), 718–730. Scholar
  10. Globerman, J., & Bogo, M. (2003). Changing times: Understanding social workers’ motivation to be field instructors. Social Work, 48(1), 65–73. Scholar
  11. Gursansky, D., & Le Sueur, E. (2011). Conceptualising field education in the twenty-first century: Contradictions, challenges and opportunities. Social Work Education, 31(7), 914–931. Scholar
  12. Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., Kuppens, S., & Ferrell, L. W. (2011). The signature pedagogy of social work? An investigation of the evidence. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(3), 363–372. Scholar
  13. Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169. Scholar
  14. Hughes, J. M. (2010). The role of supervision in social work: A critical analysis. Critical Thinking: Policy & Practice, 2. Retrieved from
  15. Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2003). The growth of social work education programs, 1985–1999; Its impact on economic and educational factors related to the profession of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(2), 279–295. Scholar
  16. Ketner, M., Cooper-Bolinkey, D., & VanCleave, D. (2017). The meaning and value of supervision in social work field education. Field Educator, 7(2), 1–16. Retrieved from
  17. Mirabito, D. M. (2012). Educating a new generation of social workers: Challenges and skills needed for contemporary agency-based practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40, 245–254. Scholar
  18. Mor Barak, M., Travis, D., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83(1), 3–32. Scholar
  19. Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. Scholar
  20. O’Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. Scholar
  21. Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2013). Challenges to the future of evidence-based practice in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3), 405–428. Scholar
  22. Salsberg, E., Quigley, L., Mehfoud, N., Acquaviva, K., Wyche, K., & Sliwa, S. (2017). Profile of the social work workforce. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simmons College School of Social WorkBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations