Advertisement

Financial Market as Driver for Disparity in Wealth Accumulation—A Receding Horizon Approach

  • Raphaele Chappe
  • Willi Semmler
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we study the extent to which the financial market has contributed to wealth disparities. To that end we introduce a stochastic dynamic model of wealth accumulation with preferences, consumption and portfolio choice, which roughly replicates the long-term evolution of assets under management. Using a receding horizon approach for solving nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) in finite time, we run simulations with three types of investors (conservative, moderate and aggressive) corresponding, roughly, to the social population segments identified in Piketty (Le capital au XXIe siècle, Seuil, Paris, 2013) for thinking about distributional matters, namely the lower segment (bottom 50%), the middle segment (middle 40%), and the upper segment (upper 10%) respectively. We estimate the impact on the end wealth distribution of first, investor-level characteristics (calibrated for each investor class), which directly impact the saving rate; and second, higher expected returns for wealthier (aggressive) investors in the top decile through the availability of leverage. We find that differences in investor-level characteristics (and significantly the length of the receding horizon) combined with access to leverage are sufficient to generate fat tails. Though results are obtained in a stochastic approach, the outcomes are less related to stochastic shocks than to some feedback and scale effects operating in favor of some investors in the financial market.

Keywords

Life-cycle Portfolio choice Wealth distribution Nonlinear-predictive-control Receding horizon 

JEL Classification

G110 D31 

References

  1. Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica, 70(3), 855–882.Google Scholar
  2. Aiyagari, S. R. (1994). Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 659.Google Scholar
  3. Angeletos, G. M. (2007). Uninsured idiosyncratic investment risk and aggregate saving. Review of Economic Dynamics, 10(1), 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2006.11.001.Google Scholar
  4. Barsington, D., Kato, M., & Semmler, W. (2010). Transitioning out of poverty. Metroeconomica, 61(1), 68–95.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital. Journal of Political Economy, 70, S9–S49.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153–89.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, R. A. (1980). On the long-run steady state in a simple dynamic model of equilibrium with heterogeneous households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(2), 375–382.Google Scholar
  8. Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., & Zhu, S. (2011). The distribution of wealth and fiscal policy in economies with finitely lived agents. Econometrica, 79(1), 123–157.Google Scholar
  9. Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., & Zhu, S. (2014). The wealth distribution in Bewley models with investment risk. NBER Working Paper No. 20157.Google Scholar
  10. Benhabib, J., & Zhu, S. (2008). Age, luck, and inheritance. Working Paper 14128, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among U.S. households? American Economic Review, 91(4), 832–857.Google Scholar
  12. Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2016). Trickle-down consumption. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(5), 863–879.Google Scholar
  13. Brock, A. W., & Durlauf, S. N. (2006). Social interactions and macroeconomics. In D. Colander (Ed.), Post-walrasian macroeconomics: Beyond the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brunnermeier, M., & Sannikov, Y. (2009). A macroeconomic model with a financial sector. Princenton, NJ: Princeton University. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Brunnermeier, M. K., & Sannikov, Y. (2014). A macroeconomic model with a financial sector. American Economic Review, 104(2), 379–421.Google Scholar
  16. Cagetti, M. (2003). Wealth accumulation over the life cycle and precautionary savings. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(3), 339–353.Google Scholar
  17. Cagetti, M., & De Nardi, M. (2006). Entrepreneurship, frictions, and wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), 835–870.Google Scholar
  18. Cagetti, M., & De Nardi, M. (2008). Wealth inequality: Data and models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12, 285–313.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, J., & Viceira, L. (2002). Strategic asset allocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management. (2014). World Wealth Report.Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, C. D. (2000). Why do the rich save so much? In J. B. Slemrod (Ed.), Does atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Chakrabarty, H., Katayama, H., & Maslen, H. (2008). Why do the rich save more? A thoery and australian evidence. Economic Record Sep2008 Supplement, 84, S32–S44.Google Scholar
  23. Chiarella, C., Hsiao, C.-Y., & Semmler, W. (2007). Intertemporal asset allocation when the underlying factors are unobservable. Computational Economics, 29(3), 383–418.Google Scholar
  24. Chiarella, C., Semmler, W., Hsiao, W., Hsiao, C.-Y., & Mateane, L. (2016). Sustainable asset accumulation and dynamic portfolio decisions. Berlin: Spinger.Google Scholar
  25. Coates, J. C., & Hubbard, R. G. (2007). Competition in the mutual fund industry: Evidence and implications for policy. Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper 592, Harvard. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1005426.
  26. Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dyck, I. J. A., & Pomorski, L. (2011). Is bigger better? Size and performance in pension plan management. Working Paper 1690724. Rotman School of Management Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1690724.
  28. Dynan, K., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. (2004). Do the rich save more? Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 397–444.Google Scholar
  29. European Central Bank. (2013). The Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey Results: From the First Wage. Statistics Paper Series. No 2/April 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Fernholz, R., & Fernholz, R. (2014). Instability and concentration in the distribution of wealth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 44, 251–269.Google Scholar
  31. Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  32. Friedman, M. (1953). Choice, chance, and the personal distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy August, 42(4), 277–290.Google Scholar
  33. Friend, I., & Kravis, I. B. (1957). Consumption patterns and permanent income. American Economic Review, 47(2), 536–555.Google Scholar
  34. Goldin, C. D., & Katz, L. (2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Greiner, A., Semmler, W., & Gong, G. (2005). The forces of economic growth: A time series perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Grüne, L., & Pannek, J. (2011). Nonlinear model predictive control. Theory and algorithms. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Grüne, L., Semmler, W., & Stieler, M. (2015). Using nonlinear model predictive control for dynamic decision problems in economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 60, 112–133.Google Scholar
  38. Hicks, J. R. (1950). A contribution to the theory of the trade cycle. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Huggett, M. (1993). The risk-free rate in heterogeneous-agent incomplete-insurance economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17(5–6), 953–969.Google Scholar
  40. Kaldor, N. (1956). Alternative theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 83–100.Google Scholar
  41. Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In F. A. Lutz & D. C. Hague (Eds.), The theory of capital. Proceedings of a conference held by the international economics association (pp. 177–222). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  42. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  43. Klass, O. S., Biham, O., Levy, M., Malcai, O., & Solomon, S. (2007). The Forbes 400, the Pareto power-law and efficient markets. The European Physical Journal B—Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 55, 143–147.Google Scholar
  44. Krugman, P. (1994). Past and prospective causes of high unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, 1994, 23–43.Google Scholar
  45. Krusell, P., & Smith, A. A, Jr. (1998). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy. Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 867.Google Scholar
  46. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.Google Scholar
  47. Latzco, D. A. (1999). Economies of scale in mutual fund administration. Journal of Financial Research, 22(3), 331–339.Google Scholar
  48. Lawrence, E. C. (1991). Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from panel data. Journal of political economy, 99(1), 54.Google Scholar
  49. Levy, M. (2006). Market efficiency, the pareto wealth distribution and the levy distribution of stock returns. In L. E. Blume & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, III. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Malkiel, B. G. (2013). Asset management fees and the growth of finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 97–108.Google Scholar
  51. Mersch, Y. (2014). Keynote speech. In Corporate Credit Conference, Zurich, October 17, 2014.Google Scholar
  52. Modigliani, F., & Ando, A. (1960). The permanent income and life cycle hypothesis of saving behavior: Comparison and tests, in consumption and saving. Edited by Irwin Friend and Robert Jones (Vol. II, pp. 49–174). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  53. Modigliani, F., & Brumberg, R. (1954). The life cycle hypothesis of saving. In K. K. Kurihara (Ed.), Post-Keynesian economics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Munk, C., Sørensen, C., & Nygaard Vinther, T. (2004). Dynamic asset allocation under mean-reverting returns, stochastic interest rates and inflation uncertainty: Are popular recommendations consistent with rational behavior? International Review of Economics and Finance, 13(2), 141–166.Google Scholar
  55. Murphy, K. M., Riddell, W. C., & Romer, P. M. (1998). Wages, skills, and technology in the United States and Canada. In E. Helpman (Ed.), General purpose technologies and economic growth (pp. 283–309). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nirei, M., & Souma, W. (2007). Two factor model of income distribution dynamics. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(3), 440–459.Google Scholar
  57. Pasinetti, L. (1962). Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), 267–279.Google Scholar
  58. Platen, E., & Semmler, W. (2009). Asset Markets and Monetary Policy. Research Paper Series 247, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar
  59. Pigou, A. C. (1951). Professor duesenberry on income and savings. Economic Journal, 61(244), 883–885.Google Scholar
  60. Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  61. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  62. Quadrini, V. (1999). The importance of entrepreneurship for wealth concentration and mobility. Review of Income and Wealth, 45(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  63. Quadrini, V. (2000). Entrepreneurship, saving, and social mobility. Review of Economic Dynamics, 3(1), 1–40.  https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1999.0077.Google Scholar
  64. Richardson, D. J. (1995). Income inequality and trade: How to think, what to conclude. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 33–55.Google Scholar
  65. Riley, J. G. (1976). Information, screening and human capital. American Economic Papers, Papers and Proceedings, 66, 254–260.Google Scholar
  66. Rubart, J., Greiner, A., & Semmler, W. (2004). Economic growth, skill-based technical change and wage inequality: A model and estimations for the U.S. and Europe, Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute of Economics (VWL) 22656, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute of Economics (VWL).Google Scholar
  67. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2014). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from, http://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-zucmanNBER14wealth.pdf.
  68. Saltz, I. (1999). An examination of the causal relationship between savings and growth in the third world. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(1), 90.Google Scholar
  69. Semmler, W. (2011). Asset Prices, Booms, and Recessions: Financial Economics From a Dynamic Perspective (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Semmler, W., & Parker, D. (2016). Asset accumulation with heterogeneous households: The rise of wealth disparity, inequality and finance. In B. Bökemeier & A. Greiner (Eds.), Inequality and finance in macrodynamics, dynamic modeling and econometrics in economics and finance (Vol. 23). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Stiglitz, J. E. (1975). The theory of screening, education, and the distribution of income. American Economic Review, 65, 283–300.Google Scholar
  72. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the Banker’s Paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In W. G. Runciman, J. Maynard Smith, & R. I. M. Dunbar (Eds.), Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.Google Scholar
  73. Vickrey, W. (1947). Resource distribution patterns and the classification of families. Studies in Income and Wealth, NBER, 10.Google Scholar
  74. Wachter, J. (2002). Portfolio and consumption decisions under mean-reverting returns: An exact solution for complete markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(1), 63–91.Google Scholar
  75. Wolff, E. N. (1996). Top heavy. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wolff, E. N. (2006). Changes in household wealth in the 1980s and 1990s in the U.S. In E. P. Ltd. (Ed.), International Perspectives on Household Wealth (pp. 107–150). Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
  77. Wolff, E. N. (2010). Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze—an update to 2007. Working Paper No. 589. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.Google Scholar
  78. Wolff, E. N. (2012). The Asset Price Meltdown and the Wealth of the Middle Class. NBER Working Paper 18559. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18559
  79. Wolff, E., & Zacharias, A. (2007). The impact of wealth inequality on economic well-being. Challenge, 50(4), 65–87.Google Scholar
  80. Yellen, J. (2014). Perspectives on inequality and opportunity from the survey of consumer finances. Speech given at the conference on economic opportunity and inequality, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Massachusetts, October 17, 2014. Available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/yellen20141017a.htm#f15.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New School For Social ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations