Advertisement

Computational Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 617–632 | Cite as

Groupon and Groupon Now: Participating Firm’s Profitability Analysis

  • Jenn-Bing Ong
  • Wee-Keong NgEmail author
  • Artem Vorobev
  • Thanh-Nghia Ho
Article
  • 234 Downloads

Abstract

The business model of Groupon has been categorized by many to be a case of daily deals or discount offerings to consumers. It is static (not responsive to business fluctuations and demands) and operates in batch mode (period-based availability). “Groupon Now” was proposed to be distinct from Groupon in that Groupon Now is dynamic and real-time. Groupon Now was conceived to be more responsive to business fluctuations—firms may choose to offer deals during business downtime and likewise withhold deals during business uptime. In this study, a time-continuum model for profitability analysis based on the two-period Groupon model developed by Edelman (Mark Lett 15, 2014) is introduced to compare the profitability between Groupon, Groupon Now, and firm normal operations without offering discount vouchers. The numerical experiments show consistent results that Groupon Now is only marginally more profitable than Groupon, but both are superior to the firm normal operations without offering any discount vouchers. The latter analysis is especially true if there is a high consumer demand to fulfill and the firm’s product or service is a popular consumers’ choice. Furthermore, the numerical experiments also suggest that firms offer moderate discount rates (\(\gtrsim \)50%) in large portion when their products or services are less well-known or less popular; and use moderate discount rates, deep discount rates (<50%), or both for price discrimination when their products or services are well-received by consumers.

Keywords

Voucher discounts Deep discounts Groupon Groupon Now Value proposition Customer heterogeneity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank Xiaolu Hou from School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore for helpful discussion on this work.

References

  1. Agrawal, R. (2012). Why Groupon now won’t work. http://venturebeat.com/2012/05/09/why-groupon-now-wont-work/
  2. Arabshahi, A. (2011). Undressing groupon: An analysis of the groupon business model. Working Paper, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  3. Ayodeji, O., Tunde, N., & Adebowale, A. E. (2015). An appraisal of groupon E-business model. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(01), 291–297.Google Scholar
  4. Bai, X., Marsden, J.R., Ross Jr., W.T., Wang, G. (2015). Relationships among minimum requirements , facebook likes , and groupon deal outcomes. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 6(3). doi: 10.1145/2764919
  5. Balakrishnan, R., & Bhatt, R. P. (2015). Real-time bid optimization for group-buying ads. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(4), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bils, M. (1989). Pricing in a customer market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byers, J.W., Mitzenmacher, M., Zervas, G. (2012). Daily deals: prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM ’12 (pp. 543–552). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2124295.2124361.
  8. Chen, B., Qin, T., Liu, T.y. (2015). Mechanism design for daily deals. In Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 327–335).Google Scholar
  9. Chen, C. C., & Chung, M. C. (2015). Predicting the success of group buying auctions via classification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y. C., Wu, J. H., Peng, L., & Yeh, R. C. (2015). Consumer benefit creation in online group buying: The social capital and platform synergy effect and the mediating role of participation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coviello, L., Franceschetti, M. (2015). Group buying with bundle discounts: computing efficient, stable and fair solutions. arXiv:1506.00682.
  12. Edelman, B., Jaffe, S., Kominers, S.D. (2011). To groupon or not to groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Harvard Business School, p. 15.Google Scholar
  13. Edelman, B., Jaffe, S., Kominers, S.D. (2014). To groupon or not to groupon : The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Letters, 27, 15.Google Scholar
  14. Jiang, X., & Deng, S. (2014). Optimal strategy for selling on group-buying website. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(4), 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacerda, A., Santos, R. L. T., Veloso, A., & Ziviani, N. (2015). Improving daily deals recommendation using explore-then-exploit strategies. Information Retrieval Journal, 18(2), 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marinesi, S., Girotra, K., Netessine, S. (2013). Operational advantages and optimal design of threshold discounting offers. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Meir, R., Lu, T., Tennenholtz, M., & Boutilier, C. (2014). On the value of using group discounts under price competition. Artificial Intelligence, 216, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ni, G., Luo, L., Xu, Y., Xu, J., & Dong, Y. (2015). Optimal decisions on group buying option with a posted retail price and heterogeneous demand. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roy, S.B., Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Liu, R. (2015). From group recommendations to group formation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data (pp. 1603–1616).Google Scholar
  20. Wu, J., Shi, M., & Hu, M. (2015). Threshold effects in online group buying. Management Science, 61(9), 2025–2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ye, M., Wang, C., Aperjis, C., Huberman, B.a., Sandholm, T. (2012). Collective attention and the dynamics of group deals. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web WWW 12 Companion (p. 1205).Google Scholar
  22. Yeh, R.C., Chen, Y.C., Lin, L.M., Wu, J.H. (2014). Factors affecting consumers value creation in online group buying. In 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2014).Google Scholar
  23. Zhao, M., Wang, Y., Gan, X. (2014). Signalling effect of daily deal promotion for a start-up service provider. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67, 1–14.Google Scholar
  24. Zhou, G., Xu, K., & Liao, S. S. Y. (2013). Do starting and ending effects in fixed-price group-buying differ? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Tyumen State UniversityTyumenRussia

Personalised recommendations