Advertisement

Is globalization linked to low corruption in OECD countries?

  • Ali MadanipourEmail author
  • Michael F. Thompson
Article

Abstract

The current study examines the combinational effects of globalization, wealth, democracy, political stability, and legal efficiency on the perception of state corruption within 34 members of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (the OECD) countries. Seminal academic literature clearly shows that all these factors can influence corruption within nations and this study focuses on the pathways through which globalization is mediated by unique combinations of other factors that work in tandem through the use of Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The analysis of conditions reveals that a high level of globalization is neither sufficient nor necessary condition on its own for low corruption but combines with other conditions in distinct pathways to be sufficient for either high corruption or low corruption among the research cases. Other internal factors appear more clearly associated with corruption, with low legal efficiency as a necessary condition for high corruption, while high democracy and high legal efficiency serving as important necessary conditions for low corruption.”

Keywords

Corruption Globalization OECD nations Qualitative-comparative analysis 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ades, A., Di Tella, R. (1996). The causes and consequences of corruption. IDS Bulletin 27(2), 6–10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ades, A. and Di Tella, R. (1999). Rents, competition and corruption. The American Economic Review 89(4), 982–993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akhter, S. H. (2004). Is Globalization what it's Cracked Up to be? Economic Freedom, Corruption, and Human Development. Journal of World Business, 39(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asongu, S. A. (2014). Globalization, (fighting) corruption and development: how are these phenomena linearly and nonlinearly related in wealth effects? Journal of Economic Studies, 41(3), 346–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Attila, J. (2013). Globalization and Corruption: New evidence. Oil, Gas and Energy Quarterly, 541–562.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badinger, H., & Nindl, E. (2012). Globalization, Inequality, and Corruption, Department of Economics Working Paper Series, 139. Vienna: WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Badinger, H., & Nindl, E. (2014). Globalization, and Corruption Revisited. The World Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12156.
  8. 8.
    Baumgartner, M. (2015). Parsimony and Causality. Quality & Quantity, 49, 839–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & Seidel, T. (2009). Common Political Culture: Evidence on Regional Corruption Contagion. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(3), 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beesley, C. (2015). Globalization and corruption in post-Soviet countries: perverse effects of economic openness. Journal of Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(2), 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blackburn, K., Bose, N., & Haque, M. E. (2006). The Incidence and Persistence of Corruption in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 30(12), 2447–2467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The Effect of Democracy and Press Freedom on Corruption: An Empirical Test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa Tavares, S. (2007). Do Rapid Political and Trade Liberalizations Increase Corruption? European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 1053–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Das, J., & Dirienzo, C. (2009). The Nonlinear Impact of Globalization on Corruption. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 3(2), 33–46.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalization - Gauging its Consequence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Economist Intelligence Unit 2013. Democracy Index, available at https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index.
  17. 17.
    Getz, K. A., & Volkema, R. J. (2001). Culture, Perceived Corruption, and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcomes. Business & Society, 40(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gillespie, K., & Okruhlik, G. (1991). The Political Dimensions of Corruption Cleanups - a Framework for Analysis. Comparative Politics, 24(1), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Girling, J. L. S. (1997). Corruption, Capitalism and Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glynn, P., Kobrin, S. J., & Naim, M. (1997). The Globalization of Corruption. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (pp. 7–30). Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halim, N. (2008). Testing Alternative Theories of Bureaucratic Corruption in Less Developed Countries. Social Science Quarterly, 89(1), 236–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herzfeld, & Weiss. (2003). Corruption and Legal (In) Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Political. Economy, 19(3), 621–632.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnston, M. (1997). Public Officials, Private Interests, and Sustainable Democracy: When Politics and Corruption Meet. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (pp. 61–82). Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kubbe, I., & Engelbert, A. (2018). Corruption and the impact of democracy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 70, 175–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9732-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lalountas, D. A., Manolas, G. A., & Vavouras, I. S. (2011). Corruption, Globalization and Development: How are these Three Phenomena Related? Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(4), 636–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lambsdorff, J. (2007). The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levin, M., & Satarov, G. (2000). Corruption and Institutions in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paldam, M. (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture, and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Potrafke, N. (2012). Intelligence and Corruption. Economics Letters, 114(1), 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Methods. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Savin, A. (2003). The Political Economy of Corruption in Transition and the Pressures of Globalization. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 148–158.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schweitzer, H. (2005). Corruption – its spread and decline. In J. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The New Institutional Economics of Corruption (pp. 16–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sharma, P. (2014). Corruption is a first world problem, too World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/11/corruption-is-a-first-world-problem-too/ Accessed 17 Nov 2014.
  39. 39.
    Stockemer, D., LaMontagne, B., & Scruggs, L. (2011). Bribes and ballots: The impact of corruption on voter turnout in democracies. International Political Science Review, 34(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Transparency International. (2012). The Corruption Perception Index (pp. 2000–2012). Berlin: Germany available at www.transparency.org.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Treisman, D. (2000). The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Uslaner, E. M. (2005). Trust and corruption. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The New Institutional Economics of Corruption (pp. 76–92). New York: NY, Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uslaner, E. M., & Badescu, G. (2004). Honesty, Trust, and Legal Norms in the Transition to Democracy: Why Bo Rothstein is Better Able to Explain Sweden than Romania. In J. Kornai, B. Rothstein, S. Rose-Ackerman, & Collegium Budapest (Eds.), Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition (pp. 31–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Warner, C. M. (2007). The Best System Money can Buy: Corruption in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    World Bank. (2012a). The Worldwide Governance Indicators, available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home.
  47. 47.
    World Bank. (2012b). World Development Reports: GDP (PPP) Per Capita, available at http://econ.worldbank.org.
  48. 48.
    World Economic Forum. (2012). Global Competitive Index, available at http://www.weforum.org/.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeSimpson CollegeIndianolaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of north TexasDetonUSA

Personalised recommendations