Advertisement

Are regional crime rates in India natural?

  • Ramphul OhlanEmail author
Article

Abstract

Crime has been around for as long as the human society. The present study examines whether there is a natural rate of crime in India at both national and state-level using annual data for aggregate and specific crime types. The presence of unit root in crime rate series has been investigated by accommodating endogenously determined structural break point. The empirical analysis indicates that most of the regional crime rates series are stationary which implies the existence of natural rate of crime in India. Based on our findings it is suggested that India should focus on improving the socioeconomic status of the general masses instead of devoting more resources to short-term measures of reducing crime rates. In addition, the state-level social profiles should be taken into consideration for articulating crime-fighting policies.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 521–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chalfin, A., & McCrary, J. (2017). Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cameron, S. (1988). The economics of deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos, 41, 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costantini, M., Meco, I., & Paradiso, A. (2018). Do inequality, unemployment and deterrence affect crime over the long run? Regional Studies, 52(4), 558–571.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buck, A. J., Hakim, S., & Spiegel, U. (1985). The natural rate of crime by type of community. Review of Social Economy, 43, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phelps, E. S. (1967). Phillips curves, inflation expectations, and optimal employment over time. Economica, 34, 254–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman, J., Hakim, S., & Spiegel, U. (1989). The difference between short and long run effects of police outlays on crime. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook, J., & Cook, S. (2011). Are US crime rates really unit root processes? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I., & Smyth, R. (2010). Is there a natural rate of crime? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(2), 759–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahu, J. P., & Mohanty, C. K. (2016). Is there a natural rate of crime in India? Contemporary Social Science, 11(4), 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook, S., & Winfield, T. (2013). Crime across the states: Are U.S. crime rates converging? Urban Studies, 50, 1724–1741.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arya, V., Page, A., River, J., Armstrong, G., & Mayer, P. (2018). Trends and socio-economic determinants of suicide in India: 2001–2013. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cook, S., & Winfield, T. (2015). The urban–rural divide, regional disaggregation and the convergence of crime. Applied Economics, 47(47), 5072–5087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohlan, R. (2013). Pattern of regional disparities in socio-economic development in India: District level analysis. Social Indicators Research, 114, (3), 841–873.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham, V. (2012). The deteriorating labour market conditions and crime: An analysis of Indian states during 2001-2008. Millennial Asia, 3(2), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prasad, K. (2012). Economic liberalization and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(4), 925–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ansari, S., Verma, A., & Dadkhah, K. M. (2015). Crime rates in India: A trend analysis. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(4), 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amaral, S., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2015). Court backlogs and crime in India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 4(2), 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parida, Y., Bhardwaj, P., & Roy Chowdhury, J. (2018). Effects of economic development and crime on tourism in India. Anatolia, 29(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dutta, M., & Zakir, H. (2009) Determinants of crime rates: Crime deterrence and growth in post-liberalized India. MPRA paper no. 144.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bharadwaj, A. (2014). Is poverty the mother of crime? Empirical evidence of the impact of socioeconomic factors on crime in India. Atlantic Review of Economics, 1, 1–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hazra, D., & Cui, Z. (2018) Macroeconomic determinants of crime: Evidence from India. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 16(1), 187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-018-0127-6.
  24. 24.
    Iyer, L., & Topalova, P. B. (2014) Poverty and crime: Evidence from rainfall and trade shocks in India. Harvard Business School BGIE unit working paper no. 14-067. http://www.hbs.Edu/faculty/publication%20Files/14-067_45092fee-b164-4662-894b-5d28471fa69b.Pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2019.
  25. 25.
    Chaudhuri, K., Chowdhury, P., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2015). Crime in India: Specification and estimation of violent crime index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maity, S., & Sinha, A. (2018). Interstate disparity in the performance of controlling crime against women in India: Efficiency estimate across states. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mazeika, D. M., & Kumar, S. (2017). Do crime hot spots exist in developing countries? Evidence from India. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buck, A., Gross, M., Hakim, S., & Weinblatt, J. (1983). The deterrence hypothesis revisited. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Debnath A. & Das S. (2017) Relationship between crime and economic affluence in India: an empirical study from 1982 to 2013. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chaudhuri, K., Chowdhury, P., & Reilly, K. (2013). A new perspective on violent crime burden index: Evidence from Indian districts. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 771–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Elliott, G., Thomas, J., & James, S. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hall, A. D. (1994). Testing for a unit root in time series with pretest data based model selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 461–470.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Narayan, P. K., & Popp, S. (2013). Size and power properties of structural break unit root tests. Applied Economics, 45(6), 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Narayan, P. K., & Popp, S. (2010). A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(9), 1425–1438.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blakeslee, D. S., & Fishman, R. (2018). Weather shocks, agriculture, and crime evidence from India. Journal of Human Resources, 53(3), 750–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ohlan, R. (2016). Rural transformation in India in the decade of miraculous economic growth. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 4(2), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Patil, V., & Purkayastha, B. (2018). The transnational assemblage of Indian rape culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(11), 1952–1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mittal, M., Goyal, L. M., Sethi, J. K., & Hemanth, D. J. (2018). Monitoring the impact of economic crisis on crime in India using machine learning. Computational Economics, 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Management Studies and ResearchMaharshi Dayanand University RohtakRohtakIndia

Personalised recommendations