Advertisement

Private sector corruption: realities, difficulties of comprehension, causes and perspectives. The Lithuanian approach

  • Laurynas PakstaitisEmail author
Article

Abstract

The problem of corruption has many significant aspects. With the growth of powers of business and transition of powers from state to private entities problem of private sector corruption becomes more important. While states employ legal and social mechanisms to make an impact on corruption the private sector is usually left with lesser attention. As experience of Lithuania shows even when such attention is pointed towards the private sector and business it sometimes is not adequately judged. If such attention presents traditional institutional approach without proper understanding of the depth of the problem inadequacy and sluggishness prevail. This paper focuses on concepts of corruption in the private sector, the academic ideas, conceptual backings, also presents the difficulties of characterization, analysis of legal acts and shortcomings thereof. The legal tools employed in Lithuania to combat business corruption are analyzed. For the proper understanding of the problem author points out the major reasons behind the private sector corruption, presents the significance of economic motivation as well as the causal spectrum of private sector corruption. The significance of business ethics and self regulation mechanisms and various shortcomings related to them are analyzed.

Keywords

Corruption Private sector corruption Private-to-private corruption Business corruption 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ragauskas P., Kavoliūnaitė-Ragauskienė E., & Vitkutė E. (2014). Korupcija privačiame sektoriuje: normatyvinė samprata ir paplitimas tam tikrose srityse. Vilnius: Justitia.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonikova, N. A. (2015). Private sector corruption in international trade: The need for heightened reporting and a private right of action in the foreign corrupt practices act. International Law & Management Review, 11, 93–124.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burda, R. (2012). Korupcija privačiame sektoriuje: apibrėžties ir teisinio reguliavimo galimybės. Current Issues of Business and Law, 7(1), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argandona, A. (2003). Private-to-private corruption. Working Paper WP No 531, December, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nichols, P. M. (2004). Corruption as an assurance problem. American University International Law Review, 19, 1307–1350.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saglibene, D. (2014). U.K. bribery act: A benchmark for anti-corruption reform in the United States. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 23, 119–146.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crutchfield, B. G., Lacey, K. A., & Birmele, J. (1999). On the threshold of the adoption of global antibribery legislation: A critical analysis of current domestic and international efforts toward the reduction of business corruption. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 32, 1–48.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andvig, J. C. (2002). Remarks on private-to-private corruption. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 635(December).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaikin, D. (2008). Commercial corruption and money laundering: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Financial Crime, 15(3), 269–281.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13590790810882865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horder, J. (2011). Bribery as a form of criminal wrongdoing. Law Quarterly Review, 2011, 127(Jan), 37–54.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaiafa-Gbandi, M. (2010). Punishing corruption in the public and the private sector: The legal framework of the European Union in the international scene and the Greek legal order. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 18, 139–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. The Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaksaitė, S. (2012). Problems of criminalizing, qualification, proof of corruption in the private sector: Analysis of some practical examples. Korupcijos privačiame sektoriuje kriminalizavimo, kvalifikavimo ir įrodinėjimo problemos: Kai kurių praktinių pavyzdžių analizė. Teisės apžvalga Law review, 2(9), 36–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolf, S. (2016). Dark sides of anti-corruption law: A typology and recent developments in german anti-bribery legislation. German Law Journal, 17(7), 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aleknevičienė, J. (2013). Lietuvos „kova“ su korupcija: kodėl nepastebime pažangos. Lietuvos metinė strateginė apžvalga 2013-2013. Lithuania's “fight“ against corruption: why we don‘t see progress. Lithuania's annual strategic survey. Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija, 11, 255–259.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krajewska, A., & Makowski, G. (2017). Corruption, anti-corruption and human rights: The case of Poland’s integrity system. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68, 325–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9710-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masiokaitė, A. (2017). Lietuvos gyventojai rečiau susidūrė su korupcija. The citizens of Lithuania faced corruption less frequently. https://lietuvosdiena.lrytas.lt/aktualijos/2017/12/12/news/lietuvos-gyventojai-reciau-susidure-su-korupcija-3858615/. Accessed 25 January 2018.
  18. 18.
    Anti-Corruption Handbook for Business. (2016). http://avv.stt.lt/Index. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  19. 19.
    Vian, T. (2008). Review of corruption in the health sector: Theory, methods and interventions. Health Policy and Planning, 23, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cragg, A. W. (1998). Business, globalization and the logic and ethics of corruption. International Journal, 53, 643–660.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gavelis, V. (2010). Korupcijos klasifikacija ekonominių santykių kontekste. Clasification of corruption in context of economic relations. Ekonomika ir vadyba: aktualijos ir perpektyvos, 1(17), 51–56.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carr, I. (2006). Strategic improvements in the fight against corruption in international business transactions. Journal of Business Law, (Jun 2006), 375–395.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tyler, T. R. (2014). Reducing corporate criminality: The role of values. American Criminal Law Review, 51, 267–291.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei, S. (1998). Corruption in economic development: Beneficial grease, minor annoyance, or major obstacle? Harvard University and National Bureau of economic research. World Bank policy research working paper no. 2048. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/876b/971dc2dee539435c96676ccf866dbb2ed57d.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  25. 25.
    Žukauskas, V. (2018). Kai netoleruoti šešėlio per brangu. Lietuvos laisvosios rinkos institutas. https://www.llri.lt/naujienos/ekonomine-politika/v-zukauskas-kai-netoleruoti-seselio-per-brangu/vytautas-zukauskas. Accessed 12 January 2018.
  26. 26.
    Benton, L. A., Bruijneel, M. T., Reider-Gordon, M., & Takher, A. (2012). Anti-Corruption. The International Lawyer, 46, 353–374.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burger, E. S., & Holland, M. S. (2006). Why the private sector is likely to lead the next stage in the global fight against corruption. Fordham International Law Journal, 30, 45–74.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heineman, B. W., Jr., & Heimann, F. (2006). The long war against corruption. Foreign Affairs, 85(3), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plan of measures of the National programme in the fight against corruption. National Anti-Corruption Programme for the year 2015 to 2025 of the Republic of Lithuania approved by resolution no. XII-1537 of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania of 10 March 2015 https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/25c529d0cbed11e4aaa0e90fce879681
  30. 30.
    Sööt, M. et al. (2006). Private-to-private corruption: Taking business managers’ risk assessment seriously when choosing anti-corruption measures. OECD working paper.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Newhouse, M. E. (2014). Institutional corruption: A fiduciary theory. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 23, 553–594.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grundmann, S., & Lambsdorff, J. G. (2017). How income and tax rates provoke cheating – An experimental investigation of tax morale. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graycar, A. & Jancsics, D. (2016). Gift Giving and Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833, 40, 1013, 1023
  34. 34.
    Argandona, A. (2005). Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-01334-4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fadiman, J.A. (1986). A traveler’s guide to gifts and bribes. Harvard Business Review,(July–August, 1986), 122–136.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smeltzer, L. R., & Jennings, M. M. (1998). Why an international code of business ethics would be good for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 57–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Online article (2017). Judge sends VW manager to prison for 7 years in diesel scam. https://www.mail.com/int/scitech/news/8131028-judge-sends-vw-manager-to-prison-7-years-diesel-sc.htrnl#.1272-stage-set8-7. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
  38. 38.
    Lachat-Heritier, A. (1983). Commercial bribes: The Swiss answer. Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Market Law, 5, 79–96.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ivanova, A. A. (2013). Corruption in the sphere of Russian entrepreneurship. Actual Problems of Economy and Law, 3, 204–211.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sandgren, C. (2005). Combating corruption: The misunderstood role of law. International Law, 39, 717–732.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2016). Corruption in international business. Journal of World Business, 51, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    David-Barrett, E. (2017). Business unusual: Collective action against bribery in international business. Crime, Law and Soacial Change.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9715-1.
  43. 43.
    VVeinhardt, J., & Petrauskaitė, L. (2014). Nepotizmo prevencija Lietuvos privataus sektoriaus organizacijose: teorinės gairės. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai/ Mangement of Organizations: Systematic Research, 69, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Online article (2017). Banko Snoras finansinį patikrinimą atlikęs auditorius pripažintas kaltu. Auditor who performed a financial audit of the Bank Snoras has been convicted https://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/50224973/banko-snoras-finansini-patikrinima-atlikes-auditorius-pripazintas-kaltu. Accessed 17 November 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law Institute of LithuaniaVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations