Legal mobilization in Russia: how organizations of lawyers can support social changes
To illustrate the role of organizations of lawyers in social changes we analyze the process of transforming legal and socio-political institutions in Russia over the past 30 years. We combine the theory of legal mobilization with the concept of violence and social orders proposed by North, Wallis and Weingast to describe the general logic of this process. Russian case shows that exogenous shocks stimulate collective action of criminal defence lawyers which, in turn, compel the government to respond. The state can promote the passivity of the legal community and stop legal mobilization by providing certain preferences for the profession. Even though in the 2000s, Russia took the path of destroying legal institutions, legal profession in certain circumstances could again act as an agent of social change. We conclude that the efficiency of collective action depends on the institutional capacity of legal association and on the position of the professional elite standing at its head.
JEL classificationK49 D71 L84
The study has been funded within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100’. We express special gratitude to Daniil Sitkevich for assistance in the selection of cases for this article. The authors are grateful for the useful comments made by Alexander Khvoshchinsky, Ekaterina Khodzhaeva, Igor Redkin, Alexander Krokhmalyuk, and participants in the XVII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development (April, 2016) and Mercadus Conference “The Life & Legacy of Douglass North: Celebrating the 25th Anniversary of North’s Nobel Prize in Economics” (March, 2018).
- 1.Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Postill, J. (2014). Freedom technologists and the new protest movements: A theory of protest formulas. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 20(4), 402–418.Google Scholar
- 6.Bell, D. A. (1994). Lawyers and citizens: The making of a political elite in old regime France (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 10.Harding, A., & Whiting, A. (2012). Custodian of civil liberties and justice in Malaysia: the Malaysian bar and the moderate state. In T. Halliday, L. Karpiq, & M. Feeley (Eds.), Fates of political liberalism in the British post-colony the politics of the legal complex (pp. 247–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Epp, C. (2012). The legal complex in the struggle to control police brutality in India. In T. Halliday, L. Karpiq, & M. Feeley (Eds.), Fates of political liberalism in the British post-colony the politics of the legal complex (pp. 91–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 12.Ghias, S. A. (2010). Miscarriage of chief justice: Judicial power and the legal complex in Pakistan under Musharraf. Law & Social Inquiry, 35(4), 985–1022.Google Scholar
- 14.McCann, M. (2006). Law and social movements: Contemporary perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105917.Google Scholar
- 15.Munger, F. W., Cummings, S. L., & Trubek, L. G. (2014). Mobilizing law for justice in Asia: A comparative approach. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 31(3), 353–420.Google Scholar
- 16.Halliday, T. C., Karpik, L., & Feeley, M. M. (Eds.). (2007). Fighting for political freedom: Comparative studies of the legal complex and political liberalism. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- 17.Karpik, L., & Halliday, T. C. (2011). The legal complex. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105512.Google Scholar
- 18.North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 19.North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., Webb, S. B., & Weingast, B. R. (2013). In the shadow of violence: Politics, economics, and the problems of development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Frye, T. (2004). Credible commitment and property rights: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 453–466.Google Scholar
- 22.Firestone, T. (2008). Criminal corporate raiding in Russia. The International Lawyer, 42(4), 1207–1229.Google Scholar
- 23.Gans-Morse, J. (2015). Violence, law, and property rights: institutional demand in post-soviet Russia. Retrieved from http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jlg562/documents/Gans-Morse-ViolenceLawandPropertyRightsToCIntroChapter.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.
- 24.Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. (2014). Normal countries: The east 25 years after communism. Foreign Affairs, 1–18.Google Scholar
- 29.Zemans, F. K. (1983). Legal mobilization: The neglected role of the law in the political system. American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703.Google Scholar
- 30.Silbey, S. S. (2005). After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938.Google Scholar
- 31.Marshall, J. (2006). Are small-town lawyers positivist about the law? In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and sociology (pp. 279–302). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 33.Halliday, T. C. (1982). The idiom of legalism in bar politics: Lawyers, McCarthyism, and the civil rights era. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 7(4), 911–988.Google Scholar
- 34.Halliday, T. C. (1987). Beyond monopoly: Lawyers, state crises, and professional empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 35.Ledford, K. F. (2006). From general estate to special interest: German lawyers 1878–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 36.Rajah, J. (2012). Authoritarian rule of law: Legislation, discourse and legitimacy in. Singapore: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 37.Brinks, D. M. (2007). The judicial response to police killings in Latin America: Inequality and the rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 41.Prabhat, D. (2011). After 9/11: Guantánamo and the mobilization of lawyers. In Special Issue Social Movements/Legal Possibilities (Vols. 1–0, Vol. 54, pp. 213–259). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/S1059-4337%282011%290000054011. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.
- 42.van der Vet, F.(2018). “When they come for you”: Legal mobilization in new authoritarian Russia. Law & Society Review, 52(2), 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12339
- 43.Faqir, K., Islam, F., & Rizvi, S. H. (2013). The lawyers movement for judicial Independence in Pakistan: A study of Musharraf regime. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(2), 345–357.Google Scholar
- 44.McEvoy, K., & Rebouche, R. (2007). Mobilizing the professions: Lawyers, politics, and the collective legal conscience. In J. Morison, K. McEvoy, & G. Anthony (Eds.), Judges, transition, and human rights (pp. 275–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199204939.001.0001/acprof-9780199204939-chapter-14. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.
- 47.Carugati, F., Ober, J., & Weingast, B. R. (2015). Is development uniquely modern? Athens on the doorstep (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2370579). Rochester: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2370579. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.
- 50.Kelly, J. E. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism, and long waves. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- 51.Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, second printing with new preface and appendix (revised edition.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 58.Volkov, V. (2012). How judges pass decisions: Empirical law studies. Moscow: Statut.Google Scholar
- 60.Halliday, T., Powell, M. J., & Granfors, M. W. (1993). After minimalism: Transformations of state bar associations from market dependence to state reliance, 1918 to 1950. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 515–535.Google Scholar
- 62.Parker, C., & Evans, A. (2007). Inside lawyers’ ethics (1st ed.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 64.Kazun, A. (2015). Violent corporate raiding in Russia: Preconditions and protective factors. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 23(4), 459–484.Google Scholar
- 66.Doner, R., & Schneider, B. R. (2000). Business associations and economic development: Why some associations contribute more than others. Business and Politics, 2(3), 261–288.Google Scholar
- 67.Gobe, E. (2013). Of lawyers and Samsars: The legal services market and the authoritarian state in Ben “Ali”s Tunisia (1987—2011). Middle East Journal, 67(1), 45–63.Google Scholar
- 68.Winn, J. K., & Yeh, T. (1995). Advocating democracy: The role of lawyers in Taiwan’s political transformation. Law & Social Inquiry, 20(2), 561–599.Google Scholar