Concurrent and Prospective Relations Between Attentional Biases for Emotional Images and Relapse to Depression
- 177 Downloads
This study examined concurrent and prospective associations between attentional biases for emotional images and relapse to depression. Previously depressed (n = 121) and never depressed (n = 28) women completed an eye-tracking task to measure attentional biases for emotional images (face images and naturalistic images) and were then followed for 6 months to assess for relapse to depression. Participants returned for a follow-up session that included the eye-tracking task after a relapse or after 6 months. Previously depressed women who experienced a relapse to depression during the study period showed the hypothesized pattern of decreased attention to positive images and increased attention to negative images, relative to previously depressed women who did not experience a relapse and never depressed women. This was true at the initial visit for naturalistic images and at the follow-up visit for both face and naturalistic images. Women who relapsed had greater attentional biases for some image types at the follow-up visit (when in a state of relapse) than the initial visit (when in a state of remission). Contrary to hypothesis, non-relapsed previously depressed women did not exhibit attentional biases for emotional images relative to never depressed women. Reduced attention to positive images prospectively predicted relapse to depression among the previously depressed women. The results clarify how attentional biases manifest and change from a remitted to relapsed state and provide preliminary evidence for reduced attention to positive information as a risk factor for depression recurrence.
KeywordsDepression Relapse Recurrence Attentional biases Eye-tracking
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their excellent feedback and suggestions. This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Kristin Newman, Leanne Quigley, Amanda Fernandez, Keith Dobson, and Christopher Sears declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was approved by the authors’ institutional research ethics board (the Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary).
Informed consent was obtained from all the individuals participating in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn., text rev.) Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- DeRaedt, R., & Koster, E. (2010). Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neurosciences, 10, 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.1.50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elgersma, H. J., Koster, E. H., Vugteveen, J., Hoekzema, A., Penninx, B. W., Bockting, C. L., & de Jong, P. J. (2019). Predictive value of attentional bias for the recurrence of depression: A 4-year prospective study in remitted depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 114, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elgersma, H. J., Koster, E. H. W., van Tuijl, L. A., Hoekzema, A., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Bockting, C. L. H., et al. (2018). Attentional bias for negative, positive, and threat words in current and remitted depression. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. New York: Biometrics Research Department.Google Scholar
- Gotlib, I., & Joormann, J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev/clinpsy.121208.131305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lazarov, A., Ben-Zion, Z., Shamai, D., Pine, D. S., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2018). Free viewing of sad and happy faces in depression: A potential target for attention bias modification. Journal of Affective Disorders, 238, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.047.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez, A., Romero, N., & De Raedt, R. (2017). Depression-related difficulties disengaging from negative faces are associated with sustained attention to negative feedback during social evaluation and predict stress recovery. PLoS ONE, 12, e0175040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175040.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Soltani, S., Newman, K., Quigley, L., Fernandez, A., Dobson, K., & Sears, C. (2015). Temporal changes in attention to sad and happy faces distinguish currently and remitted depressed individuals from never depressed individuals. Psychiatry Research, 230, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., Williams, J., & The Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of the PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J., Leon, A., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T., Marcus, D., Westerlund, A., Casey, B., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Woody, M., Owens, M., Burkhouse, K., & Gibb, B. (2016). Selective attention toward angry faces and risk for major depressive disorder in women: Converging evidence from retrospective and prospective analyses. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615581580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar