Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 27, Issue 3–6, pp 875–916 | Cite as

Of Embodied Action and Sensors: Knowledge and Expertise Sharing in Industrial Set-Up

  • Aparecido Fabiano Pinatti de CarvalhoEmail author
  • Sven Hoffmann
  • Darwin Abele
  • Marcus Schweitzer
  • Peter Tolmie
  • David Randall
  • Volker Wulf


Knowledge and expertise sharing has long been an important theme in CSCW and, importantly, one that has frequently challenged a prevailing view concerning knowledge management. This critique focused, initially, on the practical problems associated with issues of Organisational Memory (OM), and in particular the difficulties inherent in an oversimplified ‘repository’ model. Attention then turned to issues of contextuality and communication for expertise sharing, drawing on concepts such as communities of practice and social capital to understand, again, the sharing of knowledge and expertise in practice. Here, we report on how particular kinds of ‘embodied action’ can be identified in relation to the potential of cyber-physical infrastructures for knowledge sharing in an industrial context. We argue that, in a complex industrial domain, both the recording of physical movement – ‘showing’ – and the representation of local knowledge – ‘telling’ – are potentially relevant. Our proposal is that the evolution of cyber-physical infrastructures now offers a way of changing some early assumptions about how knowledge might be captured and displayed. We argue that we are entering a third generation of knowledge and expertise sharing research, where the use of augmented reality (AR) and sensor technology will result in significant new methodological innovations, including the capture and sharing of knowledge, embedded in embodied action.


Augmented reality Cyber-physical systems Didactic practices Know how Know that Knowledge and expertise sharing Local knowledge Organisational memory Tacit knowledge Sensor technology 



The findings in this paper come from the research project ‘Cyberrüsten 4.0: Cyber-physische Unterstützung des Menschen beim Rüstvorgang am Beispiel eines Biegeprozesses zur Klein- serienfertigung auf Basis eines Wissenstransferansatzes’, funded by a grant of the European Union and EFRE.NRW (No. EFRE-0800263).


  1. Ackerman, Mark S. (1998). Augmenting Organizational Memory: A Field Study of Answer Garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 203–224.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, Mark S.; and Christine Halverson (2004). Sharing Expertise: The Next Step for Knowledge Management. In: M. Huysman; and V. Wulf (eds): Social Capital and Information Technology. London: MIT Press, pp. 273–299.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, Mark S.; and Thomas W. Malone (1990). Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory. In: COCS ’90. Proceedings of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TC-OA Conference on Office Information Systems, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 25-27 April 1990. New York: ACM Press, pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
  4. Ackerman, Mark S.; and David W. McDonald (1996). Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. In: CSCW ’96. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 16 - 20 November, 1996. New York: ACM Press, pp. 97–105.Google Scholar
  5. Ackerman, Mark S.; Volkmar Pipek; and Volker Wulf (eds) (2003). Sharing Expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge and London: The MIT press.Google Scholar
  6. Ackerman, Mark S.; Juri Dachtera; Volkmar Pipek; and Volker Wulf (2013). Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, vol. 22, no. 4–6, pp. 531–573.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2006). Ethnography. In J. L. Green; G. Camilli; P. B. Elmore; A. Skukaukaiti; and E. Grace (eds): Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 279-298.Google Scholar
  8. Argote, Linda; and Paul Ingram (2000). Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 150–169.Google Scholar
  9. Argyris, Chris (1999) Tacit Knowledge and Management. In R. J. Sternberg and J. A. Horvath (eds): Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 123–140.Google Scholar
  10. Ayres, Lioness (2016). Thematic Coding and Analysis. In L. M. Given (ed): The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp. 868–869.Google Scholar
  11. Bannon, Liam J.; and Kari Kuutti (1996). Shifting Perspectives on Organizational Memory: From Storage to Active Remembering. In: HICSS’96. Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 3-6 January 1996. New York: IEEE, pp. 156–167.Google Scholar
  12. Baumard, Philippe (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. London; Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Beach, Wayne A.; and Curtis D. LeBaron (2002). Body Disclosures: Attending to Personal Problems and Reported Sexual Abuse During a Medical Encounter. Journal of Communication.
  14. Benford, Steve; John Bowers; Lennart E. Fahlén; Chris Greenhalgh; and Dave Snowdon (1995). User Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In: CHI’95. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA, 7-11 May 1995. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp. 242-249.Google Scholar
  15. Bowers, John; Graham Button and Wes Sharrock (1994). Workflow Systems From Within and Without. In: H. Marmolin; Y. Sundblad; and K. Schmidt (eds): ECSCW’95. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 10-14 September 1995, Stockholm, Sweden. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 51 – 66.Google Scholar
  16. Bowers, John; James Pycock and Jon O’Brien (1996). Talk and Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In: CHI’96. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Britsh Columbia, Canada, 13-18 April 1996. New York: ACM, pp. 58-65.Google Scholar
  17. Bracht, U.; Dieter Geckler; and Sigrid Wenzel (2011). Digitale Fabrik: Methoden und Praxisbeispiel. Vieweg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Braun, Virginia; and Victoria Clarke (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper; P. M. Camic; D. L. Long; A. T. Panter; D. Rindskopf; and K. J. Sher (eds): APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association: pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, John Seely; and Paul Duguid (1994). Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, John Seely; and Paul Duguid (1998). Organizing Knowledge. California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 90–111.Google Scholar
  21. Bryman, Allan (2008). Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cakmakci, Mehmet (2009). Process Improvement: Performance Analysis of the Setup Time Reduction-SMED in the Automobile Industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 41, no. 1–2, pp. 168–179.Google Scholar
  23. Caudell, T. P.; and D. W. Mizell (1992). Augmented Reality: An Application of Heads-up Display Technology to Manual Manufacturing Processes. In: HICSS’92. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 7-10 January 1992. New York: IEEE, pp. 659–669.Google Scholar
  24. Chen, Toly; and Horng-Ren Tsai (2017). Ubiquitous manufacturing: Current practices, challenges, and opportunities. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 45, June 2017, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
  25. Chong, Chee-yee; Srikanta P. Kumar; and Senior Member (2003). Sensor Networks : Evolution, Opportunities, and Challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1247–1256.Google Scholar
  26. Chung, Kyung H.; John P. Shewchuk; and Robert C. Williges (1999). Application of augmented reality to thickness inspection. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 331–342.Google Scholar
  27. Clarke, Karen; John Hughes; Dave Martin; Mark Rouncefield; Ian Sommerville; Corin Gurr; Mark Hartswood; Rob Procter; Roger Slack; and Alex Voss (2003). Dependable Red Hot Action. In K. Kuutti; E. H. Karsten; G. Fitzpatrick; P. Dourish; and K. Schmidt (eds): ESCW’03. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Helsink, Finland, 14-18 September 2003. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 61-80.Google Scholar
  28. Crossley, Nick (1995). Merleau-Ponty, the Elusive Body and Carnal Sociology. Body & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
  29. Czarniawska, Barbara (2007). Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Herndon: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dunston, Phillip S.; and Do Hyoung Shin (2009). Key Areas And Issues For Augmented Reality Applications On Construction Sites. In X. Wang and M. A. Schnabel (eds): Mixed Reality In Architecture, Design And Construction. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar
  31. Fakourfar, Omid; Kevin Ta; Richard Tang; Scott Bateman and Anthony Tang (2016). Stabilized Annotations for Mobile Remote Assistance. In: CHI’16. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, 7-12 May 2016. New York: ACM, pp. 1548–1560.Google Scholar
  32. Feiner, Steven; Blair Macintyre; and Dorée Seligmann (1993). Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
  33. Fitzpatrick, Geraldine (2003). Emergent Expertise Sharing in a New Community. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf (eds): Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management. London, UK: The MIT Press, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar
  34. Fussell, Susan R.; Leslie D. Setlock and Robert E. Kraut (2003). Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In: CHI ’03. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 5-10 April 2003. New York: ACM, 513-520.Google Scholar
  35. Gallagher, Shaun (2010). Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. Topoi, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 183–185.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Gauglitz, Steffen; Cha Lee; Matthew Turk and Tobias Höllerer (2012). Integrating the Physical Environment into Mobile Remote Collaboration. In: MobileHCI’12. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, San Francisco, California, USA. New York: ACM, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
  37. Gauglitz, Steffen; Benjamin Nuernberger; Matthew Turk and Tobias Höllerer (2014a). In Touch with the Remote World: Remote Collaboration with Augmented Reality Drawings and Virtual Navigation. In: VRST ’14. Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Edinburgh, Scotland, 11-13 November 2014. New York: ACM, pp. 197–205.Google Scholar
  38. Gauglitz, Steffen; Benjamin Nuernberger; Matthew Turk and Tobias Höllerer (2014b). World-Stabilized Annotations and Virtual Scene Navigation for Remote Collaboration. In: UIST’14. Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 5–-8 October 2014. New York: ACM, pp. 449–459.Google Scholar
  39. Gellersen, Hans (2005). Smart-Its: Computers for Artifacts in the Physical World. Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 66–66.Google Scholar
  40. Gibson, William; and Andrew Brown (2009). Working with Qualitative Data. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. Goodwin, Charles (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist,
  42. Grant, Robert M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 109–122.Google Scholar
  43. Grant, Robert M.; and Charles Baden-Fuller (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
  44. Greatbatch, David; Paul Luff; Christian Heath; and Peter Campion (1993). Interpersonal Communication and Human-Computer Interaction: An Examination of the Use of Computers In Medical Consultations. Interacting with Computers.
  45. Gupta, B.; L. S. Iyer; and J. E. Aronson (2000). Knowledge Management: Practices and Challenges. Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  46. Hager, Paul (2000). Know-How and Workplace Practical Judgement. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
  47. Harper, Richard; David Randall; and Mark Rouncefield. (2000). Organisational Change and Retail Finance: an Ethnographic Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Harrison, Steve; and Scott Minneman (1995). Studying Collaborative Design to Build Design Tools. In: CAAD Futures. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures, Singapore, 24-26 September. Singapore: National University of Singapore, pp. 687–697.Google Scholar
  49. Hau, Yong Sauk; Byoungsoo Kim; Heeseok Lee; and Young Gul Kim (2013). The Effects of Individual Motivations and Social Capital on Employees’ Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing Intentions. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 356–366.Google Scholar
  50. Heath, Christian; and Paul Luff (1991). Disembodied Conduct: Communication through Video In A Multi-Media Office Environment. In: CHI’91. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA, 27 April – 2 May 1991. New York: ACM, pp. 99-103.Google Scholar
  51. Heath, Christian; Paul Luff; and Abigail Sellen (1995). Reconsidering the Virtual Workplace: Flexible Support for Collaborative Activity. In H. Marmolin; Y. Sundblad; and K. Schmidt (eds): ECSCW ’95. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Stockholm, Sweden, 11-15 September 1995. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
  52. Heath, Christian; Paul Luff; and Marcus Sanchez Svensson (2007). Video and Qualitative Research: Analysing Medical Practice and Interaction. Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
  53. Henrysson, Anders; Mark Ollila; and Mark Billinghurst (2005). Mobile Phone based AR Scene Assembly. In: MUM’05. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Christchurch, New Zealand, 08-10 December 2005. New York: ACM, pp. 95-102.Google Scholar
  54. Hermanowicz, Joseph C. (2002). The Great Interview: 25 Strategies for Studying People in Bed. Qualitative Sociology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 479–499.Google Scholar
  55. Herterich, Matthias M.; Falk Uebernickel; and Walter Brenner (2015). The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, vol. 30, pp. 323–328.Google Scholar
  56. Hindmarsh, Jon; and Alison Pilnick (2002). The Tacit Order of Teamwork: Collaboration and Embodied Conduct in Anesthesia. Sociological Quarterly.
  57. Howells, J. R. L. (1996). Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
  58. Hsieh, Gary; Scott E. Hudson and Robert E. Kraut (2011). Donate for Credibility : How Contribution Incentives Can Improve Credibility. In: CHI’11. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7-12 May 2011. New York: ACM, pp. 3435–3438.Google Scholar
  59. Hu, Fei; Yu Lu; Athanasios V. Vasilakos; Qi Hao; Rui Ma; Yogendra Patil; Ting Zhang; Jiang Lu; Xin Li; and Neal N. Xiong (2016). Robust Cyber-Physical Systems: Concept, models, and implementation. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 56, pp. 449–475.Google Scholar
  60. Irlitti, Andrew; Ross T. Smith; Stewart Von Itzstein; Mark Billinghurst and Bruce H. Thomas (2017). Challenges for Asynchronous Collaboration in Augmented Reality. In: ISMAR-Adjunct. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2016 I.E. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Merida, Mexico, 19–-23 September 2016. New York: IEEE, pp. 31–35.Google Scholar
  61. Kagermann, Henning; Wolfgang Wahlster; and Johannes Helbig (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Frankfurt/Main: National Academy of Science and Engineering.Google Scholar
  62. Kendon, Adam (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounter. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne; Port Chesters; and Sydney: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Klinker, Gudrun; Oliver Creighton; Allen H. Dutoit; Rafael Kobylinski; Christoph Vilsmeier and Bernd Brgge (2001). Augmented Maintenace of Powerplants: A Prototyping Case Study of a Mobile AR System. In: ISAR 2001. Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality, New York, NY, USA, 29-30 October 2001. New York: IEEE/ACM, pp. 124–133.Google Scholar
  64. Klopfer, Eric; Judy Perry; Kurt Squire and Ming-fong Jan (2005). Collaborative Learning through Augmented Reality Role Playing. In: CSCL’05 Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: the Next 10 years!, Taipei, Taiwan, 30 May – 4 June 2005. International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 311–315.Google Scholar
  65. Knoblauch, Hubert; Alejandro Baer; Eric Laurier; Sabine Petschke and Bernt Schnettler (2008). Visual Analysis. New Developments in the Interpretative Analysis of Video and Photography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Reserach.
  66. Koschmann, Timothy; Curtis LeBaron; Charles Goodwin; Alan Zemel; and, Gary Dunnington (2007). Formulating the Triangle of Doom. Gesture.
  67. Langlotz, Tobias; Stefan Mooslechner; Stefanie Zollmann; Claus Degendorfer; Gerhard Reitmayr; and Dieter Schmalstieg (2012). Sketching up the world: In-situ authoring for Mobile Augmented Reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 16, no. 6, August 2012, pp. 623-630.Google Scholar
  68. Lave, Jean; and Etienne Wenger (1991). Situated Learning : Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, Edward A. (2008). Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges. In: ISORC 2008. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, Orlando, FL, USA, 5-7 May 2008. New York: IEEE, pp. 363-369.Google Scholar
  70. Lee, Sanghoon; and Ömer Akin (2011). Augmented reality-based computational fieldwork support for equipment operations and maintenance. Automation in Construction, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 338–352.Google Scholar
  71. Lee, Jay; Edzel Lapira; Behrad Bagheri; and Hung-an Kao (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
  72. Lee, Jay; Behrad Bagheri; and Hung An Kao (2015). A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems. Manufacturing Letters, vol. 3, January 2015, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
  73. Ludwig, Thomas; Christoph Kotthaus; Martin Stein; Hartwig Durt; Constanze Kurz; Julian Wenz; Thorsten Doublet; Maximilian Becker; Volkmar Pipek; and Volker Wulf (2016). Arbeiten im Mittelstand 4.0 – KMU im Spannungsfeld des digitalen Wandels. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  74. Ludwig, Thomas; Peter Tolmie; and Volkmar Pipek (2017). From the Internet of Things to an Internet of Practices. In: ECSCW 2017. Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative WorkExploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies, vol. 1, no. 2. Siegen: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies, pp. 222-237.Google Scholar
  75. Luff, Paul; Jon Hindmarsh; and Christian Heath (2000). Workplace Studies. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath (eds): Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  76. Lynch, M. (1997). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Marseu, E.; D. Kolberg; M. Birtel; and D. Zühlke (2016). Interdisciplinary Engineering Methodology for changeable Cyber-Physical Production Systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 31, pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
  78. Matthew, Cynthia T. and Robert J. Sternberg (2009). Developing experience-based (tacit) knowledge through reflection. Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 530–540.Google Scholar
  79. Miller, D. P.; and A. D. Swain (1987). Human error and human reliability. In G. Salvendy (ed): Handbook of Human Factors. New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 219–250.Google Scholar
  80. Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, and H.-G. Soeffner (eds): Video analysis. Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 51–67Google Scholar
  81. Mondada, Lorenza (2012). The establishment of a common focus of attention: Issues for participants, camera(wo)men and analysts. In: P. Luff; J. Hindmarsh; D. von Lehn; and B. Schnettler (eds): Work, Interaction and Technology: A Festschrift for Christian Heath. London: King’s College, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
  82. Monostori, László (2014). Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  83. Moore, Robert J.; Jack Whalen and E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman (2010). The Work of the Work Order: Document Practice in Face-to-Face Service Encounters. In N. Llewellyn and J. Hindmarsh (eds): Organisation, Interaction and Practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne; Madrid; Cape Town; Singapore; São Paulo; Delhi; Dubai; and Tokio: Cambridge University Press, pp. 172–197.Google Scholar
  84. Murphy, Keith M. (2004). Imagination as Joint Activity: The Case of Architectural Interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity.
  85. Nahapiet, Janine; and Sumantra Ghoshal (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 2, April 1998, pp. 242–266.Google Scholar
  86. Nardi, Bonnie A.; and Yrjö Engeström (1999). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 8, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  87. Neumann, Ulrich; and Anthony Majoros (1998). Cognitive, Performance, and Systems Issues for Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing and Maintenance. In: VR’98. Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Atlanta; GA, USA. New York: IEEE.
  88. Nielsen, Jakob (1993). Usability Engineering. New York: Morgan-Kaufmann.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  89. Nonaka, Ikujiro (1991). The Knowledge-creating Company. Harvard Business Review, November-December 1991, pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
  90. Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, February 1994, pp. 14-37.Google Scholar
  91. Nonaka, Ikujiro; and Hirotaka Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company : How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Nonaka, Ikujiro; and Ryoko Toyama (2003). The Knowledge-Creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
  93. Nonaka, Ikujiro; and Georg Von Krogh (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 635–652.Google Scholar
  94. Nonaka, Ikujiro; Ryoko Toyama and Noboru Konno (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5–34 .Google Scholar
  95. Ong, S. K.; M. L. Yuan and A. Y. C. Nee (2008). Augmented reality applications in manufacturing: A survey. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 2707–2742.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  96. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1993). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Information Society, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 237–250.Google Scholar
  97. Otto, Jens; Steffen Henning; and Oliver Niggemann (2014). Why Cyber-physical Production Systems Need a Descriptive Engineering Approach – A Case Study in Plug & Produce. Procedia Technology, vol. 15, pp. 295–302.Google Scholar
  98. Paelke, Volker and Carsten Röcker (2015). User Interfaces for Cyber-Physical System: Challenges and Possible Approaches. In A. Marcus (ed): Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse: 4th International Conference, DUXU 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9186. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
  99. Palanisamy, S.; and Salman Siddiqui (2013). Changeover Time Reduction and Productivity Improvement by Integrating Conventional SMED Method with Implementation of MES for Better Production Planning and Control. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 7961–7974.Google Scholar
  100. Park, M.; L. Schmidt; C. Schlick; and H. Luczak (2007). Design and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Welding Helmet. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 317–330.Google Scholar
  101. Park, Kyung-Joon; Rong Zheng; and Xue Liu (2012). Cyber-physical systems: Milestones and research challenges. Journal Computer Communications, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  102. Pathomaree, Nattapol; and Siam Charoenseang (2005) Augmented reality for skill transfer in assembly task. In: ROMAN 2005. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Nashville, TN, USA, 13-15 August 2004. New York: IEEE, pp. 500–504.Google Scholar
  103. Pipek, Volkmar; Volker Wulf; and Aditya Johri (2012). Bridging Artifacts and Actors: Expertise Sharing in Organizational Ecosystems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 261–282.Google Scholar
  104. Polanyi, Michael (1967). Sense-Givingand Sense-Reading. Philosophy, vol. 42, no. 162, pp. 301–325.Google Scholar
  105. Pollalis, Christina; Whitney Fahnbulleh; Jordan Tynes and Orit Shaer (2017) HoloMuse: Enhancing Engagement with Archaeological Artifacts through Gesture-Based Interaction with Holograms. In: TEI’17. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Yokohama, Japan, 20-23 March 2017. New York: ACM, pp. 565–570.Google Scholar
  106. Poovendran, Radha; Krishna Sampigethaya; Sandeep K. S. Gupta; Insup Lee; K. Venkatesh Prasad; David Corman and James L. Paunicka (2012). Special Issue on Cyber-Physical Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
  107. Randall, David; Jon O’Brien; Mark Rouncefield; and John A. Hughes (1996). Organisational memory and CSCW: supporting the ‘Mavis Phenomenon’. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Hamilton, New Zeland, 24-27 November 1996. New York: IEEE, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
  108. Roberts, Joanne (2000). From Know-how to Show-how? Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 429–443.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  109. Robertson, Toni; and Ina Wagner (2015). CSCW and the Internet of Things. In N. Boulus-Rødje; G. Ellingsen; T. Bratteteig; M. Aanestad; P. Bjørn (eds): ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19–-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Cham: Springer, pp. 285-294.Google Scholar
  110. Ryle, Gilbert (1945). Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, vol. 46, no. 1945-1946, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  111. Ryle, Gilbert (2009). The concept of mind. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Sacks, Harvey (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  113. Schirner, Gunar; Deniz Erdogmus; Kaushik Chowdhury; and Taskin Padir (2013). The Future of Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Systems. Computer, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
  114. Schmidt, Kjeld (2012). The trouble with “tacit knowledge”. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 163–225.Google Scholar
  115. Schmidt, Kjeld (2014). The concept of ‘practice’: What ’s the point? In C. Rossitto; L. Ciolfi; D. Martin; and B. Conein (eds): COOP 2014. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Nice (France), 27-30 May 2014. Cham: Springer, pp. 427–444.Google Scholar
  116. Sharp, Helen; Yvonne Rogers; and Jenny Preece (2006). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  117. Shi, J.; J. Wan; H. Yan; and H.Suo (2011). A survey of cyber-physical systems. In: WCSP 2011. Proceedigs of the Wireless Communications and Signal Processing Conference, Nanjing, China, 9-11 November 2011. New York: IEEE.
  118. Shingo, Shigeo (1985). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. Portland, Oregon: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  119. Spender, J.-C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
  120. Strohbach, Martin; Hans Gellersen; Gerd Kortuem; and Christian Kray (2004). Cooperative Artefacts: Assessing Real World Situations with Embedded Technology. In N. Davies; E. D. Mynatt; and I. Siio (eds): UbiComp 2004. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham, UK, 7-10 September 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3205. Berlin, Heidelber: Springer, pp. 250–267.Google Scholar
  121. Svensson, Marcus S.; Christian Heath; and Paul Luff (2007). Instrumental Action: The Timely Exchange of Implements During Surgical Operations. In L.J. Bannon; I. Wagner; C. Gutwin; R. H. R. Harper; K. Schmidt K. (eds) ECSCW 2007. Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Limerick, Ireland, 24–-28 September 2007. London: Springer, pp. 41-60.Google Scholar
  122. Tang, Anthony; C. Neustaedter; and Saul Greenberg (2007). Videoarms: Embodiments for Mixed Presence Groupware. In N. Bryan-Kinns; A. Blanford; P. Curzon; and L. Nigay (eds): People and Computers XX — Engage. London: Springer, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
  123. Tausczik, Yla R.; and James W. Pennebaker (2012). Participation in an Online Mathematics Community: Differentiating Motivations to Add. In: CSCW’12. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 11-15 February 2012. New York: ACM, 207-216.Google Scholar
  124. Thramboulidis, Kleanthis; and Foivos Christoulakis (2016). UML4IoT—A UML-based approach to exploit IoT in cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, vol. 82, pp. 259–272.Google Scholar
  125. Tuomi, I. (1999). Data is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory. In HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 5-8 January 1999. New York: IEEE, pp. 1-12.Google Scholar
  126. Van Goubergen, Dirk and Hendrik Van Landeghem (2002). Rules for integrating fast changeover capabilities into new equipment design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 205–214.Google Scholar
  127. VDI 3430 (2014). Rotary draw bending of profiles. Available at: Access: 2nd March 2018.
  128. Voigt, Kai-Ingo (2016). Rüstprozesse. In E. Winter (ed): Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. Gabler: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar
  129. Wan, Jiafu; Hu Cai; and Keliang Zhou (2015). Industrie 4.0: Enabling Technologies. In: ICIT’15. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things, Harbin, China, 17-18 January 2015. New York: IEEE, pp. 135–140.Google Scholar
  130. Wang, Xiangyu; and Phillip S. Dunston (2006). Compatibility Issues in Augmented Reality Systems for AEC: An Experimental Prototype Study. Automation in Construction, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 314–326.Google Scholar
  131. Wang, Junfeng; Yaqing Feng; Cheng Zeng; and Shiqi Li (2014). An Augmented Reality Based System for Remote Collaborative Maintenance Instruction of Complex Products. In: CASE’14. Proceedings of the 2014 I.E. International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 18-22 August 2014. New York: IEEE, pp. 309–314.Google Scholar
  132. Watson, Sharon; and Kelly Hewett (2006). A Multi-Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 141–173.Google Scholar
  133. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice : Learning as a Social System. The Systems Thinker, vol. 9, no. 5, June/July 1998, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  134. Whalen, Jack (1995). A Technology of Order Production: Computer-aided Dispatch in Public Safety Communications. In P. ten Have and G. Psathas (eds): Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Maryland: University Press of America, pp. 187-230.Google Scholar
  135. Whalen, Jack; Marilyn Whalen; and Kathryn Henderson (2002). Improvisational Choreography in Teleservice Work. British Journal of Sociology.
  136. Winch, Peter (1964). Understanding a Primitive Society. American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 4, October 1964, pp. 307–324.Google Scholar
  137. Winch, Peter (1997). Can We Understand Ourselves ? Philosophical Investigations, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
  138. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  139. Wolf, W. (2009). Cyber-physical systems. Computers, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 88–89.Google Scholar
  140. Wulf, Volker; Markus Rohde; Volkmar Pipek; and Gunnar Stevens (2011). Engaging with Practices: Design Case Studies as a Research Framework in CSCW. In: CSCW’11. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 19-23 March 2011. New York: ACM, pp. 505–512 .Google Scholar
  141. Wulf, Volker; Claudia Müller; Volkmar Pipek; David Randall; Markus Rohde; and Gunnar Stevens (2015). Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies. In V. Wulf; K. Schmidt; D. Randall (eds): Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. London: Springer, pp. 111–150.Google Scholar
  142. Yuen, Steve Chi-Yin; Gallayanee Yaoyuneyong; and Erik Johnson (2011). Augmented Reality: An Overview and Five Directions for AR in Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, vol. 4, no. 1, Article 11.
  143. Zheng, Xianjun Sam; Cedric Foucault; Patrik Matos da Silva; Siddharth Dasari; Tao Yang; and Stuart Goose (2015) Eye-Wearable Technology for Machine Maintenance: Effects of Display Position and Hands-free Operation. In: CHI’15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18-23 April 2015. New York: ACM, pp. 2125–2134.Google Scholar
  144. Zhu, J.; S. K. Ong; and A. Y. C. Nee (2014) A context-aware augmented reality system to assist the maintenance operators. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 293–304.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information Systems and New MediaUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  2. 2.SMIUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations