Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 38–41 | Cite as

Disability Determination Under Social Security: Increasing Rates of Approval

  • Mark A. AmdurEmail author
Brief Report
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Supplemental security income (SSI), is the lifeline for our patients living in the community. Absent disability benefits most of our patients are homeless. Many will be hungry, poorly clothed, and have only rudimentary health care. The disability determination system will approve disability for < 30% of those adults making an initial application. The rate of actual disability is much higher. A large cohort (n = 251) of likely disability applicants had comprehensive diagnostic evaluations. These evaluations revealed extensive co-occurring psychiatric symptoms and features, particularly obsessive–compulsive features. Recognition and appreciation of the burden of co-occurring conditions leads to a robust increase in approval rates. Administrative or structural features of the disability determination system also depress allowance rates.

Keywords

Social security disability Psychiatric evaluation Obsessive–compulsive 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dennis, D., Lassiter, M., Connolly, W. H., & Lupfer, K. S. (2011). Helping adults who are homeless gain disability benefits: The SSI/SSDI outreach, access, and recovery (SOAR)program. Psychiatric Services, 62(11), 1373–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DI 39545.250 Consultative examination (CE) scheduling intervals (March 18, 2014). Social Security Administration Program Operations Manual System (POMS). https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nst/lnx/0439545250#a.
  3. Kauff, J. F., Clary, E., Lupfer, K. S., & Fischer, P. J. (2016). An evaluation of SOAR: Implementation and outcomes of an effort to improve access to SSI and SSDI. Psychiatric Services, 67(10), 1098–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McCauley, E., & Samples, L. (2017). Navigating the disability determination process from the perspective of incarcerated adults with serious mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 53(8), 905–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nasreddine, Z., Phillips, N., Bedirian, V., et al. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. SSI Annual Statistical Report. (2016). (Released November 2017) SSA Publication No. 13-11827. Washington, DC. Social Security Administration. Table 70, p. 144.Google Scholar
  7. Wittenburg, D., Steinagle, G., Frost, S., & Fine, R. (November 4, 2012). An assessment of consultative examination (CE) processes, content, and quality: Findings from the CE review data. Final Report. Contract Number: SS00-09-60106. Submitted to: Social Security Administration Office of Program Development and Research. Submitted by: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ThresholdsChicagoUSA
  2. 2.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations