Advertisement

Theoretical investigation of two-ends-open free spontaneous imbibition

  • Lichi DengEmail author
  • Michael J. King
Original Paper

Abstract

Two-ends-open free spontaneous imbibition refers to a laboratory core experiment, with one end face exposed to the wetting phase and the other end exposed to the non-wetting phase. Spontaneous imbibition leads to the production of non-wetting phase both co-currently and counter-currently. This paper extends previous work on systems of infinite length and presents the exact one-dimensional semi-analytic solution for such a system (Lagrangian approach) and validates the solution with numerical simulation (Eulerian approach). The methodology solves the partial differential equation of unsteady state immiscible, incompressible flow with arbitrary relative permeability and capillary pressure functions using a fractional flow concept. The solution strategy uses a Lagrangian discretization in both the temporal variable and the water saturation to solve for the instantaneous and time averaged normalized water fluxes. The approach avoids the evaluation of implicit integral solutions but instead combines an explicit calculation for the total fluid flux along with a shooting algorithm for the water imbibition to satisfy both the flow and pressure boundary conditions. The wetting phase is spontaneously imbibed into the core with the initial water inlet flux being close to infinite. As the imbibition front propagates, and before it reaches the system outlet, the ratio of the co-current non-wetting phase (oil) flux to the inlet water flux increases from zero to a finite value below one which is dependent on the intrinsic properties of the system. This indicates that the production of non-wetting phase at the inlet will not cease before the front reaches the outlet, irrespective of the length of the system. The time for the front to reach the outlet, the final ratio of co-current oil flux to inlet water flux, and the variation of total produced volume from both ends, along with their sensitivities with respect to the absolute permeability, system length, and free water saturation, are analyzed in this study as well. The results also indicate that the solution is independent of system length and permeability when expressed in terms of dimensionless time. Unlike previous studies, we have not assumed self-similar solutions or treated the flow as purely co-current or counter-current. The boundary conditions for the system analyzed here are easily achievable in the lab and have been discussed in the literature. The results from this study could be used to serve as a benchmark for numerical simulations, or in applications such as the interpretation of laboratory data for relative permeability and/or capillary pressure, or improved interpretation of laboratory to field relationships through scaling group analysis.

Keywords

Spontaneous imbibition Two-ends-open free Semi-analytic solution Transient solution Co-current and counter-current flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Energi Simulation (formally Foundation CMG) through the Texas A&M Chair in Robust Reduced Complexity Modeling and the support of the members of the MCERI JIP.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, P.Ø., Lohne, A., Stavland, A., et al.: Core scale simulation of spontaneous solvent imbibition from HPAM gel. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2018a).  https://doi.org/10.2118/190189-MS
  2. 2.
    Andersen, P.Ø., Brattekås, B., Nødland, O., et al.: Darcy-scale simulation of boundary-condition effects during capillary-dominated flow in high-permeability systems. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. (2018b).  https://doi.org/10.2118/188625-PA
  3. 3.
    Andersen, P.Ø., Qiao, Y., Standnes, D.C., et al.: Cocurrent spontaneous imbibition in porous media with the dynamics of viscous coupling and capillary back pressure. SPE J. 24(01), 158–177 (2018c).  https://doi.org/10.2118/190267-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentsen, R.G., Manai, A.A.: Measurement of cocurrent and countercurrent relative permeability curves using the steady-state method. AOSTRA J. Res. 7, 169–181 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjørnarå, T.I., Mathias, S.A.: A pseudospectral approach to the McWhorter and Sunada equation for two-phase flow in porous media with capillary pressure. Comput. Geosci. 17(6), 889–897 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9360-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourbiaux, B., Kalaydjian, F.: Experimental study of cocurrent and countercurrent flow in natural porous media. SPE Reserv. Eng. 5(03), 361–368 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.2118/18283-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng, L., King, M.J.:Capillary corrections to Buckley-Leverett flow. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.2118/175150-MS
  8. 8.
    Deng, L., King, M.J.: Estimation of relative permeability from laboratory displacement experiments application of the analytic solution with capillary corrections. SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.2118/183139-MS
  9. 9.
    Deng, L., King, M.J: Theoretical investigation of water blocking in unconventional reservoirs due to spontaneous imbibition and water adsorption. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2,875,353
  10. 10.
    Deng, L., King, M.J.: Theoretical investigation of the transition from spontaneous to forced imbibition. SPE J. 24(01), 215–229 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.2118/190309-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fayers, F.J., Sheldon, J.W.: The effect of capillary pressure and gravity on two-phase fluid flow in a porous medium. Soc. Pet. Eng. (1959).  https://doi.org/10.2118/1089-G
  12. 12.
    Ferno, M.A., Haugen, A., Brattekas, B. et al.: Quick and affordable SCAL: spontaneous core analysis. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysis. Society of Core Analysis. SCA2015–003. (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fokas, A., Yortsos, Y.: On the exactly solvable equation S t = [(βS + γ)−2 S x]x + α(βS + γ)−2 S x occuring in two-phase flow in porous media. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42(2), 318–332 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1137/0142025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foley, A.Y., Nooruddin, H.A., Blunt, M.J.: The impact of capillary backpressure on spontaneous counter-current imbibition in porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 107, 405–420 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fučík, R., Mikyška, J., Beneš, M., et al.: An improved semi-analytical solution for verification of numerical models of two-phase flow in porous media. Vadose Zone J. 6(1), 93–104 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haugen, A., Ferno, M.A., Mason, G., et al.: Capillary pressure and relative permeability estimated from a single spontaneous imbibition test. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 115, 66–77 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karimaie, H., Pourmohammadi, S., Samiei, M., Toraeter, O.: 1D-simulation of countercurrent imbibition process in a water wet matrix block. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysis. Society of Core Analysis. SCA2004–52. (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kyte, J.R., Rapoport, L.A.: Linear wateflood behavior and end effects in water-wet porous media. J. Pet. Technol. 10(10), 47–50 (1958).  https://doi.org/10.2118/929-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leverett, M.C.: Capillary behavior in porous solids. Trans. AIME. 142(1), 159–172 (1941).  https://doi.org/10.2118/941152-G Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McWhorter, D.B., Sunada, D.K.: Exact integral solutions for two-phase flow. Water Resour. Res. 26(3), 399–413 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i003p00399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McWhorter, D.B., Sunada, D.K.: Reply to “comment on ‘exact integral solutions for two-phase flow’ by David B. McWhorter and Daniel K. Sunada”. Water Resour. Res. 28(5), 1479–1479 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meng, Q., Liu, H., Wang, J.: Effect of viscosity on oil production by cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition from cores with two ends open. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 20(02), 251–259 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.2118/183635-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nooruddin, H.A., Blunt, M.J.: Analytical and numerical investigations of spontaneous imbibition in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 52(9), 7284–7310 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pooladi-Darvish, M., Firoozabadi, A.: Cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition in a water-wet matrix block. SPE J. 5(01), 3–11 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.2118/38443-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rapoport, L.A., Leas, W.J.: Properties of linear waterfloods. J. Pet. Technol. 5(05), 139–148 (1953).  https://doi.org/10.2118/213-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruth, D.W., Mason, G., Ferno, M.A. et al.: Numerical simulation of combined co-current/counter-current spontaneous imbibition. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysis. Society of Core Analysis. SCA2015–002. (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmid, K.S., Geiger, S., Sorbie, K.: Semianalytical solutions for cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition and dispersion of solutes in immiscible two-phase Flow. Water Resour. Res. 47(2), (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009686
  28. 28.
    Schmid, K.S., Alyafei, N., Geiger, S., et al.: Analytical solutions for spontaneous imbibition: fractional-flow theory and experimental analysis. SPE J. 21(06), 2308–2316 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.2118/184393-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steigemeir, G.L.: Mechanisms of entrapment and mobilization of oil in porous media. In: Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding. Academic Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Terwilliger, P.L., Wilsey, L.E., Hall, H.N., et al.: An experimental and theoretical investigation of gravity drainage performance. J. Pet. Technol. 3(11), (1951).  https://doi.org/10.2118/951285-G
  31. 31.
    Wu, Y.-S., Pan, L.: Special relative permeability functions with analytical solutions for transient flow into unsaturated rock matrix. Water Resour. Res. 39(4), (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001495
  32. 32.
    Yortsos, Y.C., Fokas, A.S.: An analytical solution for linear waterflood including the effects of capillary pressure. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 23(01), 115–124 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.2118/9407-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang, F., Saputra, I.W.R., Niu, G. et al.: Upsacling laboratory result of surfactant-assisted spontaneous imbibition to the field scale through scaling group analysis, numerical simulation, and discrete fracture network Model. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.2118/190155-MS

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations