Stop! Collaborate and Listen: A Content Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Articles Investigating Parenting Strategies for Managing Adolescent Internet Use

  • Kristina Dingus Keuhlen
  • Karina Donald
  • Rachel Falbo
  • Yemi Lekuti
  • Latrisha Marroquin
  • Linda LaddEmail author
Original Paper


Research on how families deal with setting boundaries and rules for young family members is very limited in the field of family therapy. By using content analysis methods, the six authors were able to qualitatively analyze the findings from 28 evidence-based articles from multiple journals that yielded five themes that may prove useful for educators, family therapists, researchers and parents. The five themes include: Parental Efficacy; Parenting Styles; Mediation, Monitoring and Collaboration; Adolescent Risk and Risky Behavior; and Adolescent Constructive Internet Use. Parents with positive Internet experience and parents who employed a more positive attitude toward their adolescents appeared to be more efficacious in controlling their adolescents’ use of the Internet. Age and gender were important in how parents monitored the Internet usage of their daughters and sons; older adolescents were given more freedom of choice. Parents who embraced an authoritative parenting style mediated Internet use more than authoritarian or neglectful parents. Implications suggest that parents are more successful in setting boundaries when they themselves have more than basic skills, are willing to negotiate Internet use with their adolescents, and are aware of gender differences in Internet use. Therapeutic strategies for building healthy Internet use in families include: developing family values that include input from the adolescent; building parent skills and understanding of the Internet; and supporting parents in mentoring and guiding their adolescents in setting healthy boundaries that fit their maturity and gender. It is crucial that therapists help parents protect their children as they take a collaborative and positive approach to educating their children about both the risks and positive aspects of the Internet.


Parents Adolescent Internet use Boundaries Social media 



  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887–907. Scholar
  3. Benrazavi, R., Teimouri, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Utility of parental mediation model on youth’s problematic online gaming. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(6), 712–727. Scholar
  4. Blinn-Pike, L. (2009). Technology and the family: An overview from the 1980s to the present. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 567–575. Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1958). Separation of mother and child. The Lancet, 271(7029), 1070–1071. Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586. Scholar
  7. Çakir, Ö., Gezgin, D. M., & Ayas, T. (2016). The analysis of the relationship between being a cyberbully and cybervictim among adolescents in terms of different variables. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(3), 134–154. Retrieved from
  8. Chen, V. H. H., & Chng, G. S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: Effects on youths’ self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, 98, 206–212. Scholar
  9. DeCamp, W., & Ferguson, C. J. (2016). The impact of degree of exposure to violent video games, family background, and other factors on youth violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 388–400. Scholar
  10. Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 486–504. Scholar
  11. Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C. M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. Scholar
  12. Erickson, L., Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J., Rosson, M., & Perkins, D. (2016). The boundaries between: Parental involvement in a teen’s online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1384–1403. Scholar
  13. Hébert, M., Cénat, J. M., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., & Guerrier, M. (2016). Child sexual abuse, bullying, cyberbullying, and mental health problems among high school students: A moderated mediated model. Depression and Anxiety, 33(7), 623–629. Scholar
  14. Hessel, H., He, Y., & Dworkin, J. (2017). Paternal monitoring: The relationship between online and in-person solicitation and youth outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 288–299. Scholar
  15. Jang, J., Hessel, H., & Dworkin, J. (2017). Parent ICT use, social capital, and parenting efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 395–401. Scholar
  16. Jessor, R. (2001). Problem-behavior theory. In J. Raithel (Ed.), Risikoverhaltensweisen Jugendlicher [Risk behaviors of young persons] (pp. 61–78). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 394–409. Scholar
  18. Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. P. (2016). Examining two theoretical models predicting American and Dutch parents’ mediation of adolescent social media use. Journal of Family Communication, 16(3), 247–262. Scholar
  19. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Lam, L. T., & Wong, E. M. Y. (2015). Stress moderates the relationship between problematic internship use by parents and problematic Internet use by adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 300–306. Scholar
  21. Lau, W. F. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2016). The relative importance of paternal and maternal parenting as predictors of adolescents’ home Internet use and usage. Computers & Education, 102, 224–233. Scholar
  22. Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and Internet use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(5), 633–639. Scholar
  23. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. Scholar
  24. Livingstone, S., Kirvil, L., Ponte, C., & Staksrud, E. (2014). In their own words: What bothers children online? European Journal of Communication, 29(3), 277–288. Scholar
  25. Martinez de Morentin, J. I., Cortes, A., Medrano, C., & Apodaca, P. (2014). Internet use and parental medication: A cross-cultural study. Computers & Education, 70, 212–221. Scholar
  26. Meena, P., Mittal, P., & Solanki, R. (2012). Problematic use of social networking sites among urban school teenagers. Industrial Psychiatry, 21(2), 94. Scholar
  27. Özgür, H. (2016). The relationship between internal parenting styles and Internet usage of children and adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 411–424. Scholar
  28. Padilla-Walker, L. J., & Coyne, S. M. (2011). “Turn that thing off!” Parent and adolescent predictors of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 705–715. Scholar
  29. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012a). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61, 426–440. Scholar
  30. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., Fraser, A. M., Dyer, W. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012b). Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: Latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1153–1165. Scholar
  31. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analyses. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1201. Retrieved from
  32. Peskin, M. F., Markham, C. M., Shegog, R., Temple, J. R., Baumler, E. R., Addy, R. C., et al. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of the perpetration of cyber dating abuse among early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 358–375. Scholar
  33. Rodgers, R. H., & White, J. M. (2009). Family development theory. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 225–257). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Rudi, J. H., Walkner, A., & Dworkin, J. (2014). Adolescent–parent communication in a digital world. Youth & Society, 47(6), 811–828. Scholar
  35. Shin, W., Huh, J., & Faber, R. J. (2012). Tweens’ online privacy risks and the role of parental mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 632–649. Scholar
  36. Shumow, L., & Lomax, R. (2002). Parental efficacy: Predictor of parenting behavior and adolescent outcomes. Parenting, 2(2), 127–150. Scholar
  37. Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents’ Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 423–432. Scholar
  38. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tzavela, E. C., Karakitsou, C., Halapi, E., & Tsitsika, A. L. (2017). Adolescent digital profiles: A process-based typology of highly engaged Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 246–255. Scholar
  40. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computer & Education, 55, 454–464. Scholar
  41. van den Eijnden, R. J., Meerkerk, G. J., Vermulst, A. A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655–665. Scholar
  42. Vigna-Taglianti, F., Brambilla, R., Priotto, B., Cuomo, G., & Diecidue, R. (2017). Problematic Internet use among high school students: Prevalence, associated factors and gender differences. Psychiatry Research, 257, 163–171. Scholar
  43. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundation, development, and applications. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  44. Wasinski, A., & Tomczyk, L. (2015). Factors reducing the risk of Internet addiction in young people in their home environment. Children and Youth Services, 57, 68–74. Scholar
  45. West, R., & Brown, J. (2013). Theory of addiction. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family SciencesTexas Woman’s UniversityDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations