Advertisement

Investigating the Relationship Between Addiction to Mobile Social Networking with Marital Commitment and Extramarital Affairs in Married Students at Quchan Azad University

  • Azadeh Sharifinia
  • Maryam Nejati
  • Mohammad Hossein BayaziEmail author
  • Hassan Motamedi
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Extramarital affairs (EA) have become a common occurrence in modern society. Many studies have pointed to the lack of variety in a relationship as a contributing factor related to divorce and EA. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between addiction to mobile social networking (MSN) with marital commitment (MC) and EA among married students and negative interpersonal relationship outcomes. This research is considered as applied research and is descriptive and correlational. The population for this study comprised all married adults in Islamic Azad University of Quchan Branch (138 married students) while the target sample is 100 married students who were randomly selected from the population. The method of data collection in this field research is based on the questionnaire of addiction to MSN (Khaje Ahmadi questionnaire), the standard questionnaire of MC (Adams and Jones 1997) and the questionnaire of crisis relations, due to the nature of the research subject. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the research hypotheses. All hypotheses were tested at the 0.05 alpha level. In this way, after determining the research sample, the researcher individually distributed the relevant questionnaires and asked the subject to honestly answer the questions. Data extracted from three questionnaires were analyzed through the SPSS statistical analyzes (descriptive and inferential). The findings of this study showed that there is a significant relationship between addiction to MSN with MC and EA among married students. The phenomenon of addiction to MSN can lead to a cold relationship by disturbing family order and balance and, consequently, emotional divorce.

Keywords

Addiction Mobile social networking Marital commitment Extramarital affairs Couples 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I sincerely appreciate the management of Islamic Azad University in Quchan city for allowing me to carry out this research in the faculty; I am also thankful to the married students for making the data available for this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2004). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1038–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038.x.Google Scholar
  3. Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 735–749.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, D. C., Yi, J., Baucom, D., & Christensen, A. (2005). Infidelity in couples seeking marital therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 470–473.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.470.Google Scholar
  5. Brimhall, A. S., Miller, B. J., Maxwell, K. A., & Alotaiby, A. M. (2017). Does it help or hinder? Technology and its role in healing post affair. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 16(1), 42–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2016.1142408.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research and Personality, 31(2), 193–221.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175.Google Scholar
  7. Cano, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (2000). Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 774–781.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.774.Google Scholar
  8. Caro, M. M., San-Martín, M., Delgado-Bolton, R., & Vivanco, L. (2017). Empathy, loneliness, burnout, and life satisfaction in Chilean nurses of palliative care and homecare services. Enfermería Clínica (English Edition), 27(6), 379–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2017.04.010.Google Scholar
  9. Chohaney, M. L., & Panozzo, K. A. (2016). Infidelity and the internet: The geography of Ashley Madison users in the United States. Geographical Review, 108(1), 69–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12225.Google Scholar
  10. Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyber-Psychology Behavior Social Networking, 16(10), 717–720.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424.Google Scholar
  11. Clements, R., & Swensen, C. H. (2000). Commitment to one’s spouse as a predictor of marital quality among older couples. Current Psychology, 19(2), 110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1007-7.Google Scholar
  12. Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). Toward a greater understanding of premarital cohabitation and marital commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00180.x.Google Scholar
  13. Conroy, A. A., McKenna, S. A., Comfort, M. L., Darbes, L. A., Tan, J. Y., & Mkandawire, J. (2018). Marital infidelity, food insecurity, and couple instability: A web of challenges for dyadic coordination around antiretroviral therapy. Social Science and Medicine, 214, 110–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.006.Google Scholar
  14. Dalili, Z., & Bayazi, M. H. (2019). the effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on the illness perception and psychological symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 34, 139–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.11.012.Google Scholar
  15. Drigotas, S. M., & Barta, W. (2001). The cheating heart: Scientific explorations of infidelity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 177–180.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00143.Google Scholar
  16. Drouin, M., Miller, D. A., & Dibble, J. L. (2015). Facebook or memory-which is the real threat to your relationship? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(10), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0259.Google Scholar
  17. Ferron, A., Lussier, Y., Sabourin, S., & Brassard, A. (2017). The role of internet pornography use and cyber infidelity in the associations between personality, attachment, and couple and sexual satisfaction. Social Networking, 6, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2017.61001.Google Scholar
  18. Figueroa, J., & Cranefield, J. (2012). Creating and sharing knowledge through a corporate social networking site: The impact of employees’ perceptions of effectiveness. PACIS 2012 Proceedings. 172. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2012/172
  19. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. A., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754.Google Scholar
  20. Grabowicz, P. A., Ramasco, J. J., Moro, E., Pujol, J. M., & Eguiluz, V. M. (2012). Social features of online networks: The strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29358.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029358.Google Scholar
  21. Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20(4), 312–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3.Google Scholar
  22. Jahan, Y., Chowdhury, A. S., Rahman, S. M. A., Chowdhury, S., Khair, Z., Huq, K. A. T. M. E., et al. (2017). Factors involving extramarital affairs among married adults in Bangladesh. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 5, 1379–1386.  https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20171506.Google Scholar
  23. Kelmer, G. (2013). Social media and relationship development. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 32. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/332115.
  24. Krafsky, K. J., & Krafsky, K. (2010). Facebook and your marriage. Maple Valley: Turn the Tide Resource Group LLC.Google Scholar
  25. Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1191–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416252.Google Scholar
  26. Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001.Google Scholar
  27. Loudova, I., Janis, K., & Haviger, J. (2013). Infidelity as a threatening factor to the existence of the family. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1462–1469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.164.Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527.Google Scholar
  29. Mao, A., & Raguram, A. (2009). Online infidelity: The new challenge to marriages. Indian J Psychiatry, 51(4), 302–304.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.58299.Google Scholar
  30. Mosko, J. (2009). Communication and attachment dimension’s in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. West Lafayette: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, O., & Salawu, A. (2017). Can my wife be virtual-adulterous? An experiential study on Facebook, emotional infidelity and self-disclosure. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 18(2), 166–179.Google Scholar
  32. Noor, S. A., Djaba, T., & Enomoto, C. E. (2016). The role of social networking websites: Do they connect people through marriage or are they responsible for divorce? Journal of International Social Issues, 4(1), 40–49.Google Scholar
  33. Ogwokhademh, M. (2013). Factors responsible for extramarital affairs as perceived by married adults in Lagos, Nigeria. Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 6, 37–46.Google Scholar
  34. Powell, P. W., Gray, G., & Reese, M. K. (2013). Connecting with others: A qualitative study of online social networking site usage. The Practitioner Scholar: Journal of Counseling and Professional Psychology, 2, 52–67.Google Scholar
  35. Reynold, J., & Mansfield, P. (1999). The effect of changing attitudes to marriage on its stability. Lord Chancellor’s department. High divorce rates: The state of the evidence on reasons and remedies, 2, 1–3 (Research series, 2/99)Google Scholar
  36. Sayed Alitabar, S. H., Alipour, Z. M., Habibi, F., Sarvestani, A., & Javanbakht, A. R. (2016). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the marital disillusionment scale. Pejouhandeh, 20(6), 342–349.Google Scholar
  37. Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationships success from a nation’s survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659.Google Scholar
  38. Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1), 48–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.x.Google Scholar
  39. Turliuc, M. N., & Scutaru, E. L. (2014). Construction and validation of emotional responses to sexual infidelity Scale—ERSIS. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 473–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.409.Google Scholar
  40. Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social network sites, marriage well-being, and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 94–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.034.Google Scholar
  41. Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.147.Google Scholar
  42. Whitley, B. E., & Lee, S. E. (2006). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 144–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x.Google Scholar
  43. Wong, A., & Yazdanifard, R. (2015). The review of the ugly truth and negative aspects of online dating. Global Journals Inc. (USA), 15(4), 31–36.Google Scholar
  44. Yao, M. Z., & Zhong, Z. (2014). Loneliness, social contacts, and internet addiction: A cross-lagged panel study. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.007.Google Scholar
  45. Zhang, J., Cheng, M., Wei, X., & Gong, X. (2018). Does mobile phone penetration affect divorce rate? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103701.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Torbat-e-Jam BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTorbat-e-JamIran

Personalised recommendations