Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 102–114 | Cite as

Introducing Movement into Couple Therapy: Clients’ Expectations and Perceptions

  • Einat Shuper-EngelhardEmail author
  • Maya Vulcan
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

The integration of body-movement in couple therapy has gained increasing recognition in recent years. This study aimed at understanding the motivation and expectations of clients who have chosen to turn to Couple Psychotherapy through Movement and the extent to which they felt that these expectations were met in the process. Nine couples (n = 18 individuals) from a variety of backgrounds, religious affiliations, and countries of origin participated in 12 couple therapy sessions that included somatic and kinetic emphases. They were interviewed and responded to questionnaires both before and after the sessions. The findings indicated that the expectations of the participants related to a fuller expression of their difficulties and needs within the relationship through body-movement integrated therapy, and their perceptions of the process and its conclusion converged on three major themes: (a) the importance of introducing increased vitality, creativity, and playfulness into the relationship; (b) the need to learn a new mode of communication through the body; and (c) the contribution of bodily communication to the partners’ attainment of new insights about each other and their relationship. These findings highlight the role of the body in joint emotional experiences, suggesting that engaging in movement combined with verbal processing may enable partners to transform implicit bodily knowledge into conscious material in their relationship. The acquaintance with their own and their partners’ “somatic native tongue” will enhance the emotional dialogue between them, particularly in the context of ethnic and cultural diversity or different native tongues.

Keywords

Couple therapy Cultural diversity Different native tongues Embodied relationship 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Allen, J. R., & St George, S. (2001). What couples say works in domestic violence therapy. The Qualitative Report, 6, 1–20.Google Scholar
  2. Amighi, J. K., Loman, S., Lewis, P., & Sossin, K. M. (1999). The meaning of movement. Developmental perspectives of the Kestenberg movement profile. Amsterdam:‏ Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  3. Behrends, A., Müller, S., & Dziobek, I. (2016). Dancing supports empathy: The potential of interactional movement and dance for psychotherapy. In G. Hauke (Ed.), European psychotherapy 2016/2017: Embodiment in psychotherapy (pp. 99–131). United Kingdom: Books on Demand.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, M. H., Butler, M. H., & Fife, S. T. (2007). The process of couple healing following infidelity: A qualitative study. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 6, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J398v06n04_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, C., Madill, A., & Stratton, P. (2002). Parental accounts of blaming within the family: A dialectical model for understanding blame in systemic therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb00351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners.England. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Chenail, R. J., George, S. S., Wulff, D., Duffy, M., Scott, K. W., & Tomm, K. (2012). Clients’ relational conceptions of conjoint couple and family therapy quality: A grounded formal theory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 241–264.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00246.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, J. (2014). Potential benefits of dance movement psychotherapy with couples experiencing infertility. Body Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 9, 237–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17432979.2014.946969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damasio, A.(2011).Neural basis of emotions. Scholarpedia, 6, 1804.  https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, S. D., Lebow, J., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2012). Common factors of change in couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, S. D., & Piercy, F. P. (2007). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part II: Model-independent common factors and an integrative framework. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 344–363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00030.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duman, S., Grodin, J., Cespedes, Y., Fine, E., Otilingam, P., & Margolin, G. (2007). Couples. In M. Hersen, & J. C. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of clinical interviewing with adults (pp. 340–357). London: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982733.n22&%23x200F;.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eddy, M. (2016). Mindful movement: The evolution of the somatic arts and conscious action. Chicago: Intellect.‏Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, R., & James, E. (1989). Varieties of client experience in psychotherapy: An analysis of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 443–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90003-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishbane, M. D. (2007). Wired to connect: Neuroscience, relationships, and therapy. Family Process, 46, 395–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00219.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In Standard Edition, 19. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gabb, J., & Fink, J. (2015). Couple relationships in the 21st century. ‏Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434432.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gehart-Brooks, D. R., & Lyle, R. R. (1999). Client and therapist perspectives of change in collaborative language systems: An interpretive ethnography. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 18, 58–77.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2015). Communicating qualitative research: Some practical guideposts for scholars. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gottman, J. M. (1994). Why marriages succeed of fail? New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1988). The social psychology of marriage. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 181–200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  23. Gottman, J. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2015). 10 principles for doing effective couples therapy (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology). New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  24. Gottwald, C. (2015). Neurobiological perspectives on body psychotherapy. In G. Marlock & H. Weiss (Eds.), The handbook of body psychotherapy and somatic psychology (pp. 126–148). Berkley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Gurman, A. S. (2011). Couple therapy research and the practice of couple therapy: Can we talk? Family Process, 50, 280–292.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01360.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkes, L. (2003). The tango of therapy: A dancing group. Transactional Analysis Journal, 33, 288–301.  https://doi.org/10.1177/036215370303300404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heiman, J. (2007). Orgasmic disorders in women. In S. Leiblum (Ed.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (4th ed., pp. 84–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hendrix, H. (1988). Getting the love you want: A guide for couples. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S., & Zuccarini, D. (2010). Integrating sex and attachment in emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 431–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00155.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kessel, L. (2013). Couple therapy and relational body psychotherapy: Healing childhood wounds. Body Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 8, 172–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17432979.2013.804880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, S. Y., Kang, H. W., Chung, Y. C., & Park, S. (2013). Empirical application of empathy enhancing program based on movement concept for married couples in conflict. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 9, 426–431.  https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.130056.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kimble Wrye, H. (1998). The embodiment of desire: Relinking the bodymind within the analytic dyad. In L. Aron & F. S. Anderson (Eds.), Relational perspectives on the body (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kimmesa, J. G., Mallorya, A. B., Cameronb, C., & Kose, O. (2015). A treatment model for anxiety-related sexual dysfunctions using mindfulness meditation within a sex-positive framework. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30, 286–296.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma, J. L. C., & Lai, K. (2007). Perceived treatment effectiveness of family therapy for Chinese patients suffering from anorexia nervosa: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Family Social Work, 10, 59–74.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v10n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ogden, P., & Fisher, J. (2015). Sensorimotor psychotherapy: Interventions for trauma and attachment. New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  36. Patterson, J., Gardner, B. C., Burr, B. K., Hubler, D. S., & Roberts, K. M. (2012). Nonverbal behavioral indicators of negative affect in couple interaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34, 11–28.‏.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9170-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patterson, J. E., Miller, R. B., Carnes, S., & Wilson, S. (2004). Evidence-based practice for marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 30, 183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01233x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Pietrzak, T., Hauke, G., & Lohr, G. (2017). Connecting couples intervention: Improving couples’ empathy and emotional regulation using embodied empathy. In G. Hauke (Ed.), European psychotherapy 2016/2017: Embodiment in psychotherapy (pp. 66–98). Norderstedt: Books on Demand.Google Scholar
  40. Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  41. Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  42. Schott-Billmann, F. (1994). Quand la danse guerit. Paris: imprimerie de l’Indépendant, collection La recherche en danse.Google Scholar
  43. Seikkula, J., Karvonen, A., Kykyri, V. L., Kaartinen, J., & Penttonen, M. (2015). The embodied attunement of therapists and a couple within dialogical psychotherapy: An introduction to the relational mind research project. Family Process, 54, 703–715.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R.(2004).Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601 Google Scholar
  45. Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M., & Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tambling, R. B. (2012). A literature review of therapeutic expectancy effects. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34, 402–415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9201-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tambling, R. B., Anderson, S. R., & Wong, A. G. (2016). Expectations about couple therapy over time. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38, 353–360.‏.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9390-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watanabe-Hammond, S. (1990). Family dances and the rhythms of intimacy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 12, 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ylönen, M. E., & Cantell, M. H. (2009). Kinaesthetic narratives: Interpretations for children’s dance movement therapy process. Body Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 4, 215–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17432970903259683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Head Dance Movement Therapy Programme, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, Graduate School of Creative Art Therapies, Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research CenterUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, Graduate School of Creative Art TherapiesKibbutzim College of EducationTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Head Dance Movement Therapy Programme, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, Graduate School of Creative Art TherapiesKibbutzim College of EducationTel AvivIsrael
  4. 4.Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, Graduate School of Creative Art TherapiesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options