Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 6393–6404 | Cite as

An integrated data analysis of configurations of supply chain integration

  • Jiawen LiuEmail author
  • Jinlong Zhang
  • Yeming Gong
Article
  • 208 Downloads

Abstract

While some research contends that supply chain integration improves operations competency, other argues that the impact of supply chain integration on operations competency is less significant or not so clear. Based on empirical testing typologies and uncovering taxonomies, this paper examined the linkages among customer–supplier integration, supply chain process integration, cost competency, and flexibility competency empirically in strategic fit research and advances a new conceptual perspective to investigate supply chain integration. Using a sample of 124 organizations in the retailing industry, this paper found three configurations of supply chain integration with strategic fit to operational competencies for superior business performance. Case studies based on 56 organizations in three configurations were conducted to provide additional insights for strategic fit and we utilized multiple discriminant analysis to assess the validity of three configurations. We provide a new framework for theoretical advances in the supply chain integration field and help practitioners make decisions for strategic-fit supply chains across multiple departments.

Keywords

Configuration Operations strategy Strategic fit Supply chain integration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research acknowledge the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (71620107002) and National Social Science Foundation of China (16ZDA013).

References

  1. 1.
    Chuang, M., Donegan, J.J., Ganon, J.J., Wei, K.: Walmart and Carrefour experiences in China: resolving the structural paradox. Cross Cult. Manag. 18(4), 443–463 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayaram, J., Xu, K., Nicolae, M.: The direct and contingency effects of supplier coordination and customer coordination on quality and flexibility performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49(1), 59–85 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., Seth, N.: Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Q. 30(2), 225–246 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lei, D., Goldhar, J.D.: Computer-integrated manufacturing: redefining the manufacturing firm into a global service business. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 11(10), 5–18 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patnayakuni, R., Rai, A., Seth, N.: Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23(1), 13–49 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter, M., Kramer, M.: Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(1–2), 62–77 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avci, B., Girotra, K., Netessine, S.: Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: adoption and environmental impact. Manag. Sci. 61(4), 772–794 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rantasila, K., Ojala, L.: Measurement of national-level logistics costs and performance. In: 2012 Summit of the International Transport Forum, Seamless Transport: Making Connections, Leipzig, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K.: Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 15(4), 80–116 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ettlie, J.E., Reza, E.: Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 35(4), 795–827 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S., Hinings, C.R.: Special research forum: configurational approaches to organization. Acad. Manag. 36(6), 1175–1195 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: Organizations: A Quantum View. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bensaou, M., Venkatraman, N.: Configurations of inter-organizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Manag. Sci. 41, 1471–1492 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harrigan, K.R.: An application of clustering for strategic group analysis. Strateg. Manag. 6(1), 55–73 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag. Sci. 30(10), 1161–1183 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hambrick, D.C.: An empirical typology of mature industrial-product environments. Acad. Manag. J. 26(2), 213–230 (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ragin, C.: Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy set and beyond. University of Chicago, Chicago (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarmah, S.P., Acharya, D., Goyal, S.K.: Buyer vendor coordination models in supply chain management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175(1), 1–15 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reardon, T., Timmer, C.P., Minten, B.: Supermarket revolution in Asia and emerging development strategies to include small farmers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(31), 12332–12337 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., Chow, W.S.: IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(3), 326–342 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slack, N., Lewis, M.: Operations Strategy, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu, Y., Ramamurthy, K.: Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: an empirical examination. MIS Q. 35(4), 931–954 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gong, Y.: Global operations strategy: fundamentals and practice. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flynn, B.B., Huo, B., Zhao, X.: The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J. Oper. Manag. 28(1), 58–71 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee, S.G., Trimi, S., Kim, C.: The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption. J. World Bus. 48(1), 20–29 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller, D.: An organizational configurations. Hum. Relat. 4(3), 771–789 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lambert, D.M., Pohlen, T.L.: Supply chain metrics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 12(1), 1–19 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muthulingam, S., Corbett, C., Benartzi, S., Oppenheim, B.: Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 15(4), 596–615 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oh, C.H., Sohl, T., Rugman, A.M.: Regional and product diversification and the performance of retail multinationals. J. Int. Manag. 21(3), 220–234 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davidson, R., Mackinnon, J.G.: Econometrics Theory and Methods. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedman, J.: Regularized discriminant analysis. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84(405), 165–175 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simonin, B.L.: Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(7), 595–623 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu, R., Zeng, Y.R., Qu, H., et al.: Optimizing the new coordinated replenishment and delivery model considering quantity discount and resource constraints. Comput. Ind. Eng. 116, 82–96 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, L., Liu, R., Liu, S.: An effective and efficient fruit fly optimization algorithm with level probability policy and its applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 97, 158–174 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.EMLYON Business SchoolEcully CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations