Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 6345–6357 | Cite as

Online comments of multi-category commodities based on emotional tendency analysis

  • Xu Zhao
  • Chuanchao HuangEmail author
  • Hufei Pan


As the promotion competition of comprehensive e-commerce platforms becomes increasingly keener, this paper aims at finding the differences and key elements of consumer perceptions of different products from the perspective of category subdivision, and exploring the transformation mechanism between text comments and graded comments in order for accurate recommendation of products. First online commodities were generally divided into six categories; and the dictionary-based method was employed to calculate the emotional distribution of each category; then the key factors affecting user experience were identified through word frequency analysis; next, by adjusting emotion intensity and emotion weights, the correlation between text comment and graded comment was studied; finally, the prediction model was built for grade correction. Significant differences exist in the emotional perceptions of consumers whose concerns have similar dimensions but different degrees. Text comments are correlated with graded comments, but deviation between the two occurs with external interference. Adjustment of emotion intensity and emotion weight has an impact on the comprehensive emotion value of products, based on which the recommendation sequencing can be optimized.


Emotion analysis Multi-category products Online comments Emotion weight 



This work was supported by China National Nature Science Found (Grant Nos. 71401090, 71531009).


  1. 1.
    Chen, Y., Xie, J.: Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Manag. Sci. 54(3), 477–491 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bo, P., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad, S.N., Laroche, M.: How do expressed emotions affect the helpfulness of a product review? Evidence from reviews using latent semantic analysis. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 20(1), 76–111 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, M., Rodgers, S., Kim, M.: Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 31(2), 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang, D., Luo, X., Xuan, J., Xu, Z.: Sentiment computing for the news event based on the social media big data. IEEE Access 5, 2373–2382 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, C., Wang, J.: The sentiment trend analysis of twitter based on set pair contact degree. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 10(1), 798–804 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, S.Y., Park, E.J.: the effects of flow on consumer satisfaction through E-impulse buying for fashion products. Int. J. Knowl. Content Dev. Technol. 15(4), 7–24 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Punj, G.N.: Do consumers who conduct online research also post online reviews? A model of the relationship between online research and review posting behavior. Mark. Lett. 24(1), 97–108 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cui, G., Lui, H.K., Guo, X.: The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 17(1), 39–58 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mudambi, S.M., Schuff, D.: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 34(1), 185–200 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R., Kim, J.: Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consum. Res. 17(4), 454–462 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R.E., Unnava, H.R.: Consumer response to negative publicity: the moderating role of commitment. J. Mark. Res. 37(2), 203–214 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.C., Tseng, Y.D.: Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decis. Support Syst. 50(4), 755–768 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xue, F., Zhou, P.Q.: The effects of product involvement and prior experience on chinese consumers’ responses to online word of mouth. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 23(1), 45–58 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, X., Zhang, H., Xu, Z.: Public sentiments analysis based on fuzzy logic for text. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 26(9–10), 1341–1360 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Das, S.R., Chen, M.Y.: Yahoo! for amazon: sentiment extraction from small talk on the web. Manag. Sci. 53(9), 1375–1388 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kakulapati, V.: Classification of emotional intelligence of sentiment polarity. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 8(9), 381–386 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung, S., Lee, C., Kim, K., et al.: Data-driven user simulation for automated evaluation of spoken dialog systems. Comput. Speech Lang. 23(4), 479–509 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun, X., Zhang, Y., Matsuzaki, T., et al.: Probabilistic Chinese word segmentation with non-local information and stochastic training. Inf. Process. Manag. 49(3), 626–636 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kobayashi, N., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y., et al.: Collecting evaluative expressions for opinion extraction. In: International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 596–605. Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheung, M.Y., Sia, C.L., Kuan, K.K.Y.: Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(8), 618–635 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, M.J.: Do online comments influence the public’s attitudes toward an organization? effects of online comments based on individuals’ prior attitudes. J. Psychol. 149(3–4), 325 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen, S., Lerman, D.: Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. J. Interact. Mark. 21(4), 76–94 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Purnawirawan, N., Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P.: Balance and sequence in online reviews: the wrap effect. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 17(2), 71–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kusumasondjaja, S., Shanka, T., Marchegiani, C., et al.: Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: the roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence. J. Vacat. Mark. 18(3), 185–195 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chern, C.C., Wei, C.P., Shen, F.Y., et al.: A sales forecasting model for consumer products based on the influence of online word-of-mouth. IseB 13(3), 445–473 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, K., Zong, C., Su, K.Y.: Integrating generative and discriminative character-based models for Chinese word segmentation. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 11(2), 1–41 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worden, C.B., Wald, D.J., Allen, T.I., et al.: A revised ground-motion and intensity interpolation scheme for ShakeMap. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(6), 3083–3096 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economic & ManagementChina Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
  2. 2.Post-Doctoral Scientific Research WorkstationChina Merchants BankShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations