Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 5987–5996 | Cite as

A scheduling algorithm using sub-deadline for workflow applications under budget and deadline constrained

  • Ting SunEmail author
  • Chuangbai Xiao
  • Xiujie Xu


With the development of the cloud and grid computing, the cloud infrastructures and grids provide a platform for workflow applications. It is very essential to meet the requirements of users and to complete workflow scheduling efficiently. The scheduling of the workflow is limited by quality of service (QoS) parameters. Many scheduling algorithms have been proposed for the execution of workflow applications using QoS parameters. In this study, we improved a scheduling algorithm that considers workflow applications under budget and deadline constraints. This algorithm provided a simple way to deal with the deadline and budget constraints. The algorithm was named BDSD and used to find a scheduling that satisfies of deadline and budget constraints required by a user. The planning success rate (PSR) was utilized to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. For the simulation experiment, random and real workflow applications were exploited. Experimental results showed that compared with other algorithms the algorithm had a higher PSR.


Scheduling Sub-deadline Quality of service Planning success rate Workflow application 



This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4162007) and Natural Science Foundation of China (61501008).


  1. 1.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R., Ramamohanarao, K.: Workflow scheduling algorithms for grid computing. Metaheuristics Sched. Distrib. Comput. Environ. 146, 173–214 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prodan, R., Wieczorek, M.: Bi-criteria scheduling of scientific grid workflows. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 7(2), 364–376 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coffman, E.G., Bruno, J.L.: Computer and Job-shop Scheduling Theory. Wiley, New York (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ullman, J.D.: Np-complete scheduling problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 10(3), 384–393 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, F., Wu, Q., Tan, Y.: Workflow scheduling in cloud: a survey. J. Supercomput. 71(9), 3373–3418 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Germain-Renaud, C., Rana, O.: The convergence of clouds, grids, and autonomics. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(6), 9–9 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, J., Qiu, M., Ming, Z., Quan, G., Qin, X., Gu, Z.: Online optimization for scheduling preemptable tasks on IaaS cloud systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 72(5), 666–677 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiu, M., Ming, Z., Li, J., Gai, K., Zong, Z.: Phase-change memory optimization for green cloud with genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput. 64(12), 3528–3540 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gai, K., Qiu, M.K., Zhao, H.: Cost-aware multimedia data allocation for heterogeneous memory using genetic algorithm in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 99, 1–1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, X.J., Xiao, C.B., Tian, G.Z., Sun, T.: Expansion slot backfill scheduling for concurrent workflows with deadline on heterogeneous resources. Clust. Comput. 20(1), 471–483 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arabnejad, H., Barbosa, J., Prodan, R.: Low-time complexity budget-deadline constrained workflow scheduling on heterogeneous resources. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 55, 29–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, W., Sakellariou, R.: Budget-deadline constrained workflow planning for admission control. J. Grid Comput. 11(4), 633–651 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arabnejad, H., Barbosa, J.G.: A budget constrained scheduling algorithm for workflow applications. J. Grid Comput. 12(4), 665–679 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Topcuoglu, H., Hariri, S., Wu, M.: Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 13(3), 260–274 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu, J., Ramamohanarao, K., Buyya, R.: Deadline/budget-based scheduling of workflows on utility grids. Market-Oriented Grid Util. Comput. 200(9), 427–450 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R., Tham, C.K.: Cost-based scheduling of scientific workflow applications on utility grids. In: First International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, IEEE, pp. 1–8 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R., Tham, C.K.: QoS-based scheduling of workflow applications on service grids. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Conference-Science and Grid Computing, pp. 5–8 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Casanova, H., Legrand A., Quinson, M.: Simgrid: A Generic Framework for Large-scale Distributed Experiments. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, UKSIM 2008, IEEE, pp. 126–131 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakellariou, R., Zhao, H.: A hybrid heuristic for DAG scheduling on heterogeneous systems. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Proceedings. 18th International. IEEE, vol. 111 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng, W., Sakellariou, R.: Budget-deadline constrained workflow planning for admission control. J. Grid Comput. 11(4), 633–651 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R.: Scheduling scientific workflow applications with deadline and budget constraints using genetic algorithms. Sci. Program 14(3), 217–230 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, Z., Ni, Z., Gu, L., Liu, X.: A revised discrete particle swarm optimization for cloud workflow scheduling. In: Proceedings of 2010 international conference on computational intelligence and security (CIS), IEEE, pp. 184–188 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguez, M., Buyya, R.: Deadline based resource provisioning and scheduling algorithmfor scientific workflows on clouds. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 2(2), 222–235 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuan, Y., Li, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y.: Bottom level based heuristic for workflow scheduling in grids. Chin. J. Comput. Chin. 31(2), 282 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yuan, Y., Li, X., Wang, Q., Zhu, X.: Deadline division-based heuristic for cost optimization inworkflow scheduling. Inf. Sci. 179(15), 2562–2575 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Management EngineeringShandong Jianzhu UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations