Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 6837–6847 | Cite as

Cluster computing based optimization techniques for control of electrical drives

  • S. SubiramoniyanEmail author
  • S. Joseph Jawhar
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

In recent times, the applications of clustering, parallel systems and distributed systems are widely used in many areas and there may exist an enormous amount of tasks which require parallel operations to improve the efficiency and performance of the system. One of the applications is control of flyback converter which is the simplest of the DC to DC converters with galvanic isolation between the input and the output sides provided by an isolation transformer. Flyback converters comprises of a power electronic switch, a set of diodes and a transformer in addition to a filter capacitor. The increased number of nonlinear elements along with a number of energy storage elements makes the design of an appropriate control system makes it challenging. This challenge is overcome by performing the functionalities simultaneously in different virtual machines (VM) considered as a single system. Considering the basic transfer function between the manipulated parameter which is the duty cycle and the controlled parameter which is the output voltage the forward and the reverse transfer function between these two parameters are estimated using MATLAB SIMULINK. The basic transfer function is identified and function is performed in a master VM whereas internal model controller (IMC) performs its functionalities in slave VM. Finally, the control system performance of the IMC is compared against the performance of a PI controller tuned with the particle swarm optimization based tuning procedure is analyzed using virtual machines.

Keywords

Cluster computing Virtual machines Computational time Internal model controller PI controller Particle swarm optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    Panov, Y., Jovanovic, M.M.: Adaptive off-time control for variable-frequency soft-switched fly back converter at light loads. Power Electron. IEEE Trans. 17, 596–603 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pesce, C., Gimenez, R.B., Riedemann, J., Andrade, I., Pena, R.: A DC–DC converter based on modified fly back converter topology. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 14(9), 3949–3956 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panday, S.K., Kumar, A., Pati, S.L.: Large-signal model and nonlinear control of PWM converters in discontinuous conduction mode. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 003069–003074 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, T.H., Lin, W.L., Liaw, C.M.: Dynamic modeling and controller design of fly back converter. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 35(4), 1230–1239 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, K.-H., Hsu, C.-F., Lin, C.-M., Lee, T.-T., Li, C.: Fuzzy-neural sliding-mode control for DC–DC converters using asymmetric Gaussian membership functions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 54(3), 1528–1536 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaneko, O.: Fictitious reference iterative tuning of internal model controllers for a class of nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, pp. 4799–7787 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mute, D.L., et al.: Internal model based PI controller design for the coupled tank system: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference, pp. 4799–1769 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malyna, D.V., Duarte, J.L., Hendrix, M.A.M., van Horck, F.B.M.: Multi-objective optimization of power converters using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, SPEEDAM, pp. 713–717 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaing, Z.L.: A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 19(2), 384–391 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jagatheesan, K.: “A Design of PI Controller using Stochastic Particle Swarm Optimization in Load Frequency Control of Thermal Power Systems”, IEEE International Conference pp. 4673-9314 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elshaer, M.: Smart optimal control of DC–DC boost converter in PV systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, pp. 4577–0487 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang, S.H., Maksimovic, D., Cohen, I.: Efficiency optimization in digitally controlled fly back DC–DC converters over wide ranges of operating conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 27(8), 3734–3748 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tokita, Y., Oikawa, Y., Yamasaki, Y.: Parallel computing in sound field analysis by bread slicing method. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 29, 113–116 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Li, B., Niu, J.: DeMS: a hybrid scheme of task scheduling and load balancing in computing clusters. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saxena, S., Hote, Y.: Load frequency control in power systems via internal model control scheme and model-order reduction. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(3), 2749–2757 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Arunachala College of Engg for WomenVellichanthaiIndia

Personalised recommendations