Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 4, pp 7895–7905 | Cite as

Cost-effectiveness analysis and evaluation of a ‘three-old’ reconstruction project based on smart system

  • Dong Wang
  • Jingkuang Liu
  • Xuetong Wang
  • Yujing ChenEmail author
Article

Abstract

The ‘three-old’ reconstruction refers to the urban transformation and renovation activities of ‘old town’, ‘old factory building’ and ‘old village’ in a land intensive development after a city builds up to a certain stage. To accomplish the reconstruction need a continuous monitoring, but this would cause high costs for the government and the contractor. The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) jointly with artificial intelligence and smart devices can reduce these costs, help the contractors. In this study, total reconstruction cost was estimated by analyzing surrounding real estate prices and business environment changes from the urban three-old reconstruction project, based on a cost-effectiveness analysis model and smart system. We have developed a system with intelligent sensors to monitor all the reconstruction procedures. Research results demonstrated that: (1) the return on investment of the reconstruction of Pazhou Village was 27%, indicating its considerable economic benefits. This conforms to the economic benefits that real estate developers pursue. (2) For the same reconstruction project, different reconstruction modes will involve different cost-effectiveness. (3) The implicit benefits attached to the urban three-old reconstruction, such as social benefits and environmental benefits, influence the reconstruction benefits to some extent. (4) Smart system could be use in the construction project and achieve a successful result. The research conclusions and suggestions will provide support to government, developers, and related departments in making decisions about urban renewal projects.

Keywords

‘Three-old’ reconstruction Cost-effectiveness analysis Return of investment Smart system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

DW and JKL conceptualized the project, proposed the method, analyzed and interpreted the data. XTW acquired the data. DW and YJC wrote the main manuscript text which all authors have reviewed. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Study supervision was performed by DW and JKL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou, Z.: Towards collaborative approach? Investigating the regeneration of urban village in Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int. 44, 297–305 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hiller, M.M., Woda, C., Bougrov, N.G., Degteva, M.O., Ivanov, O., Ulanovsky, A., Romanov, S.: External dose reconstruction for the former village of Metlino (Techa River, Russia) based on environmental surveys, luminescence measurements, and radiation transport modelling. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 56(2), 139–159 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-017-0688-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guangzhou Urban Renewal Bureau (GURB). [VA Online]. http://www.gzuro.gov.cn (2017)
  4. 4.
    Liu, J.K., Li, J.F., Zhu. J.: Research on the index system of comprehensive benefits of the reconstruction of old factory buildings, old villages, and old towns. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, Luleå, Sweden, pp. 42–50 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mesimaki, M., Hauru, K., Kotze, D.J., Lehvavirta, S.: Neo-spaces for urban livability? Urbanites’ versatile mental images of green roofs in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Land Use Policy 61(2), 587–600 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin, Y.L., Zhang, X.L., Geertman, S.: Toward smart governance and social sustainability for Chinese migrant communities. J. Clean. Prod. 107, 389–399 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y.Q., Wu, F.L., Liu, Y., Li, Z.G.: Changing neighbourhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: a case study of Guangzhou, Finland. Urban Geogr. 38(2), 266–290 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, Y.L., de Meulder, B., Wang, S.F.: The interplay of state, market and society in the socio-spatial transformation of “villages in the city” in Guangzhou. Environ. Urban. 24(1), 325–343 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247811434362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, Y.L., Hao, P., Geertman, S.: A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ’villages in the city’. Urban Stud. 52(10), 1774–1790 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014540345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yusuf, A., Syed, P., Georgakis, Nwagboso, C.: Fuzzy Logic based built environment impact assessment for urban regeneration simulation. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Visualization (IEEE), vol. 39, pp. 90–95 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, Y., van Oort, F., Geertman, S., Lin, Y.L.: Institutional determinants of brownfield formation in Chinese cities and urban villages. Habitat Int. 44, 72–78 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao, J.L., Chen, W., Yuan, F.: Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. theoretical considerations. Land Use Policy 68, 604–613 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sendra, S., Granell, E., Lloret, J., Rodrigues, J.J.: Smart collaborative system using the sensors of mobile devices for monitoring disabled and elderly people. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Ottawa, Canada, June 10–15, pp. 6479–6483 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, Y., De Meulder, B.: A conceptual framework for the strategic urban project approach for the sustainable redevelopment of “villages in the city” in Guangzhou. Habitat Int. 36(3), 380–387 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, L.H., Lin, J., Li, X., Wu, F.: Redevelopment of urban village in China—a step towards an effective urban policy? A case study of liede village in Guangzhou. Habitat Int. 43, 299–308 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferilli, G., Sacco, P.L., Blessi, G.T.: Beyond the rhetoric of participation: new challenges and prospects for inclusive urban regeneration. City Cult. Soc. 7, 95–100 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sendra, S., Granell, E., Lloret, J., Rodrigues, J.J.: Smart collaborative mobile system for taking care of disabled and elderly people. Mobile Netw. Appl. 19(3), 287–302 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0445-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ketabdar, H., Lyra, M.: System and methodology for using mobile phones in live remote monitoring of physical activities, In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, New South Wales, Australia, June 7–9, 2010, pp. 350-356 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, Y.D., Chung, W.Y.: Wireless sensor network based wearable smart shirt for ubiquitous health and activity monitoring. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 140(2), 390–395 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Wang
    • 1
  • Jingkuang Liu
    • 1
  • Xuetong Wang
    • 1
  • Yujing Chen
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of InsuranceGuangdong University of FinanceGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of ManagementGuangdong University of TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations