Advertisement

Metastatic dissemination patterns of different primary tumors to the spine and other bones

  • Julia S. Onken
  • Lucius S. Fekonja
  • Romy Wehowsky
  • Vanessa Hubertus
  • Peter VajkoczyEmail author
Research Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Metastatic spine disease (MSD) is a severe event in cancer patients. Experimental data indicate that bone metastasis is mostly mediated by blood flow-dependent, passive arrest of circulating tumor cells to the bone metastatic niche (BMN). Here, we have set out to test these experimental observations in a clinical, human setting to improve our understanding of MSD. 507 patients, treated on spinal metastases in our institution from 2005 to  2015 were retrospectively evaluated. We identified 259 patients with accessible staging reports of the skeleton before and at initial diagnosis of MSD. Data analysis comprised localizations of bone metastases, underlying malignancy and time to development of MSD. Dissemination pattern of bone metastasis was correlated with red bone marrow (RBM) content of the respective bone as a measure of blood flow. Spinal metastases occurred most frequently in lung cancer (21%), prostate cancer (19%), and breast cancer (12%). At the diagnosis of MSD, majority of patients have multiple extra-spinal bone metastases (2/3). The distribution of metastases to extra-spinal bones and to the spine is mostly proportional to the RBM content of the involved bone. Corresponding to the high RBM content, thoracic spine, pelvic bones and ribs represent a predilection site for bone metastasis. We confirm a distinct preference of cancer types to metastasize to bones. When it comes to bone metastases all primaries show uniform distribution pattern, which supports the hypothesis of a predominantly blood flow-dependent distribution of tumor cells and passive arrest to the BMN rather than a spine-specific homing mechanism.

Keywords

Spinal metastasis Dissemination Red bone marrow Blood-flow dependent dissemination 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10585_2019_9987_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (260 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 260 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Coleman RE (2001) Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 27(3):165–176Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saad F et al (2007) Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer 110(8):1860–1867Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sathiakumar N et al (2011) Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among men with prostate cancer: a population-based analysis of US Medicare beneficiaries, 1999–2006. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14(2):177–183Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D'Oronzo S et al (2019) Metastatic bone disease: Pathogenesis and therapeutic options: Up-date on bone metastasis management. J Bone Oncol 15:004–004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mundy GR (2002) Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2(8):584 –593Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azevedo AS et al (2015) Metastasis of circulating tumor cells: favorable soil or suitable biomechanics, or both? Cell Adhes Migr 9(5):345–356Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massague J (2009) Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer 9(4):274–284Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alix-Panabieres C, Riethdorf S, Pantel K (2008) Circulating tumor cells and bone marrow micrometastasis. Clin Cancer Res 14(16):5013–5021Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byrne NM, Summers MA, McDonald MM (2019) Tumor cell dormancy and reactivation in bone: skeletal biology and therapeutic opportunities. JBMR Plus 3(3):e10125Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC (2002) Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer 2(8):563–572Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sowder ME, Johnson RW (2019) Bone as a preferential site for metastasis. JBMR Plus 3(3):e10126Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suva LJ et al (2011) Bone metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7(4):208–218Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Croucher PI, McDonald MM, Martin TJ (2016) Bone metastasis: the importance of the neighbourhood. Nat Rev Cancer 16(6):373–386Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang CY et al (2013) Comparison of distribution characteristics of metastatic bone lesions between breast and prostate carcinomas. Oncol Lett 5(1):391–397Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang N et al (2014) Prostate cancer cells preferentially home to osteoblast-rich areas in the early stages of bone metastasis: evidence from in vivo models. J Bone Miner Res 29(12):2688–2696Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, He W, Zhang S (2019) Seeking for correlative genes and signaling pathways with bone metastasis from breast cancer by integrated analysis. Front Oncol 9:138Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balic M et al (2006) Most early disseminated cancer cells detected in bone marrow of breast cancer patients have a putative breast cancer stem cell phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 12(19):5615–5621Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burnett RM et al (2015) Organ-specific adaptive signaling pathway activation in metastatic breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 6(14):12682–12696Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cetin K et al (2015) Survival in patients with breast cancer with bone metastasis: a Danish population-based cohort study on the prognostic impact of initial stage of disease at breast cancer diagnosis and length of the bone metastasis-free interval. BMJ Open 5(4):e007702Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin H et al (2011) Disseminated and circulating tumor cells: role in effective cancer management. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 77(1):1–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuh WT et al (1996) Anatomic distribution of metastases in the vertebral body and modes of hematogenous spread. Spine 21(19):2243–2250Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Broggini T et al (2016) Passive entrapment of tumor cells determines metastatic dissemination to spinal bone and other osseous tissues. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162540Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallizia E et al (2017) The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) in the assessment of response to radiotherapy for bone metastases. Clin Transl Oncol 19(11):1382–1387Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hussain I et al (2018) Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery. Spine J 18(2):261–267Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caracappa PF, Chao TC, Xu XG (2009) A study of predicted bone marrow distribution on calculated marrow dose from external radiation exposures using two sets of image data for the same individual. Health Phys 96(6):661–674Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cristy M (1981) Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. Phys Med Biol 26(3):389–400Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maccauro G et al (2011) Physiopathology of spine metastasis. Int J Surg Oncol 2011:107969Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Batson OV (1995) The function of the vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. 1940. Clin Orthop Relat Res 312:4–9Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Onuigbo WI (1975) Batson's theory of vertebral venous metastasis: a review. Oncology 32(3–4):145 – 50Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu M et al (2019) Bone metastasis pattern of cancer patients with bone metastasis but no visceral metastasis. J Bone Oncol 15:100219Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bauernhofer T et al (2005) Association of disease progression and poor overall survival with detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep 13(2):179–184Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ulmar B et al (2007) Prognosis scores of Tokuhashi and Tomita for patients with spinal metastases of renal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2):998–1004Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Naumov GN et al (2002) Persistence of solitary mammary carcinoma cells in a secondary site: a possible contributor to dormancy. Cancer Res 62(7):2162–2168Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Naumov GN et al (2003) Ineffectiveness of doxorubicin treatment on solitary dormant mammary carcinoma cells or late-developing metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82(3):199–206Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Haider M-T et al (2014) Modifying the osteoblastic niche with zoledronic acid in vivo-potential implications for breast cancer bone metastasis. Bone 66(100):240–250Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia S. Onken
    • 1
  • Lucius S. Fekonja
    • 1
  • Romy Wehowsky
    • 1
  • Vanessa Hubertus
    • 1
  • Peter Vajkoczy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversitätsmedizin ChariteBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Neurochirurgische KlinikUniversitätsmedizin ChariteBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations