Explaining participation in Earth Hour: the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior
Earth Hour is a globally celebrated environmental campaign that is aimed at converting bystanders into active participants in the combat against climate change. Although it has become a global movement, to date, few studies have investigated the motivations behind people’s participation in Earth Hour. The present study fills this gap by examining Earth Hour participation through the integration of the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior (TPB). We argue that environmental self-identity and humanity identity motivate people to participate in Earth Hour via the pathways identified in the TPB. We tested our model by conducting a survey in Hong Kong (N = 239). Results from a series of mediation analysis revealed that Earth Hour–specific attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm were positively associated with behavioral intention, which in turn predicted actual participation. Further, we found that environmental self-identity and humanity identity were positively associated with attitude and moral norm, which in turn predicted behavioral intention. These results demonstrate the viability of integrating the identity perspective and the TPB to understand people’s performance of specific pro-environmental behavior, including participation in collective action that aims to convert unconcerned individuals into active participants in environmental endeavors (i.e., conversionary collective action), such as Earth Hour. This integrated model can tell researchers and environmental practitioners not only which behavior-specific factors determine people’s behavior but also how these behavior-specific factors arise in the first place.
We acknowledge with thanks the informational support by the World Wide Fund for Nature Hong Kong throughout this research project.
- Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 28:1429–1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Der-Karabetian A, Alfaro M (2015) Psychological predictors of sustainable behavior in college samples from the United States, Brazil and the Netherlands. Am Int J Soc Sci 4:29–39Google Scholar
- Earth Hour (2016). Earth Hour 2016 report. Retrieved from https://www.earthhour.org/EarthHourReports
- Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Gifford R (2014) Environmental psychology matters. Annu Rev Psychol 65:541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McFarland S, Webb M, Brown D (2012) All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. J Pers Soc Psychol 103:830–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028724
- Sparks P, Shepherd R (1992) Self-identity and theory of planned behavior: assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism”. Soc Psychol Q 55:388–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786955
- Stets JE, Burke PJ (2003) A sociological approach to self and identity. In: Leary MR, Tangney JP (eds) Handbook of self and identity. Guilford Press, New York, pp 128–152Google Scholar
- Stuart A, Thomas EF, Donaghue N, Russell A (2013) “We may be pirates, but we are not protesters”: identity in the sea shepherd conservation society. Polit Psychol:753–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12016
- Tajfel H (1981) Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar