Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 171–187 | Cite as

The missing middle of climate services: layering multiway, two-way, and one-way modes of communicating seasonal climate forecasts

  • Chris KnudsonEmail author
  • Zack Guido
Article

Abstract

The production and distribution of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) have been principal global climate service activities for decades. During this time, the climate service community has increasingly moved away from using only one-way communication modes, like radio or bulletins, to also include multiway communication modes in the form of interactive models of science communication, like participatory workshops. The combination of such workshops with the more traditional unidirectional forms of communication helps climate service providers overcome many of the limitations that inhere in each form. However, important gaps remain even with the combination of one-way and multiway modes of communication. In this article, we draw on 17 workshops we convened in six locations that engaged with 406 small-scale coffee farmers in the Jamaican Blue Mountains and 106 farmer interviews. These workshops aimed to improve farmer access to, and understanding of, weather and climate information. We argue that an intermediate form of communication between providers and users that takes place between workshops would help providers better tailor the one-way and multiway communication modes by evaluating in real time the users’ understanding and use of the forecasts and by monitoring the dynamic context in which the users make decisions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the approximately 400 farmers who attended the workshops and a sizable number who were subsequently interviewed. Their generosity of time and participation were essential to the project. We would also like to thank those who designed and carried out the workshops: Gusland McCook and Noel Richards from JACRA, Glenroy Brown and Ronald Moody from MSJ, Elizabeth Johnson from IICA, Donovan Campbell and Jhannel Tomlinson (who also conducted the farmer interviews) from UWI, and Teddy Allen, Malgosia Madajewicz, and Ashley Curtis from IRI.

Funding information

This research was funded by NOAA (grant NA13OAR4310184) with contributions from USAID under the International Research and Applications Project.

References

  1. Aker JC (2011) Dial “A” for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agric Econ 42:631–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer ER (2003) Identifying underserved end-user groups in the provision of climate information. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnston AG, Li S, Mason SJ et al (2010) Verification of the first 11 years of IRI’s seasonal climate forecasts. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels W-L, Furman CA, Diehl DC et al (2013) Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US. Reg Environ Chang 13:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birthwright A-T (2016) Liquid gold or poverty in a cup? The vulnerability of Blue Mountain and High Mountain coffee farmers in Jamaica to the effects of climate change. In: Thomas-Hope E (ed) Climate change and food security: Africa and the Caribbean. Routledge, pp 70–83Google Scholar
  6. Brasseur GP, Gallardo L (2016) Climate services: lessons learned and future prospects. Earths Future 4:79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EF000338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun A, Jiggins J, Röling N, et al (2006) A global survey and review of farmer field school experiences. Rep Prep ILRI Endelea Wagening NethrelandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr E, Goble R, Rosko HM, et al (2018) Identifying climate information services users and their needs in sub-Saharan Africa: a learning agendaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:465–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark WC, Tomich TP, Van Noordwijk M et al (2016) Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:4615–4622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dayamba DS, Ky-Dembele C, Bayala J et al (2018) Assessment of the use of Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) approach by farmers to manage climate risk in Mali and Senegal. Clim Serv 12:27–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2018.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Chang 21:680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eakin HC, Lemos MC, Nelson DR (2014) Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 27:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ensor J, Harvey B (2015) Social learning and climate change adaptation: evidence for international development practice. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerlak AK, Guido Z, Knudson C (2017) Mid-term review of the global framework for climate services. World Meteorological OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerlak AK, Guido Z, Vaughan C et al (2018) Building a framework for process-oriented evaluation of regional climate outlook forums. Weather Clim Soc 10:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glantz M (1977) The value of a long-range weather forecast for the West African Sahel. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 58:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guido Z, Finan T, Rhiney K et al (2018) The stresses and dynamics of smallholder coffee systems in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains: a case for the potential role of climate services. Clim Chang 147:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guido Z, Hill D, Crimmins M, Ferguson D (2013) Informing decisions with a climate synthesis product: implications for regional climate services. Weather Clim Soc 5:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hackenbruch J, Kunz-Plapp T, Müller S, Schipper JW (2017) Tailoring climate parameters to information needs for local adaptation to climate change. Climate 5:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen J (2015) Training workshop on communicating weather and climate information with farmers, Same, Tanzania, September 2013. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen JW, Mason SJ, Sun L, Tall A (2011) Review of seasonal climate forecasting for agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Exp Agric 47:205–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harjanne A (2017) Servitizing climate science—institutional analysis of climate services discourse and its implications. Glob Environ Chang 46:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartmann HC, Pagano TC, Sorooshian S, Bales R (2002) Confidence builders: evaluating seasonal climate forecasts from user perspectives. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:683–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ICO (2015) Historical data on the global coffee tradeGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs K, Garfin G, Lenart M (2005) More than just talk: connecting science and decisionmaking. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47:6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kettle NP, Dow K, Tuler S et al (2014) Integrating scientific and local knowledge to inform risk-based management approaches for climate adaptation. Clim Risk Manag 4:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S (2013) Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klemm T, McPherson RA (2017) The development of seasonal climate forecasting for agricultural producers. Agric For Meteorol 232:384–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemos MC, Dilling L (2007) Equity in forecasting climate: can science save the world’s poor? Sci Public Policy 34:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X190964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2:789–794Google Scholar
  32. Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ (2005) The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Chang 15:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Pol 10:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z et al (2015) Moving toward the deliberate coproduction of climate science knowledge. Weather Clim Soc 7:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mwanga S, Kisanga J, Dinh D (2017) Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) Intermediary Training, Dodoma, Tanzania. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  36. Ogallo L, Bessemoulin P, Ceron J-P et al (2008) Adapting to climate variability and change: the climate outlook forum process. Bull World Meteorol Organ 57:93–102Google Scholar
  37. Patt A, Gwata C (2002) Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Glob Environ Chang 12:185–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00013-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patt A, Suarez P, Gwata C (2005) Effects of seasonal climate forecasts and participatory workshops among subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12623–12628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson ND, Broad K, Orlove B et al (2010) Participatory processes and climate forecast use: socio-cultural context, discussion, and consensus. Clim Dev 2:14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rahman T, Buizer J, Guido Z (2016) The economic impact of seasonal drought forecast information Service in Jamaica, 2014-15. Rep USAID Univ ArizGoogle Scholar
  41. Roncoli C (2006) Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers’ responses to climate predictions. Clim Res 33:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roncoli C, Ingram K, Kirshen P (2001) The costs and risks of coping with drought: livelihood impacts and farmers’ responses in Burkina Faso. Clim Res 19:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roncoli C, Jost C, Kirshen P et al (2009) From accessing to assessing forecasts: an end-to-end study of participatory climate forecast dissemination in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Clim Chang 92:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryghaug M, Solli J (2012) The appropriation of the climate change problem among road managers: fighting in the trenches of the real world. Clim Chang 114:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siregar PR, Crane TA (2011) Climate information and agricultural practice in adaptation to climate variability: the case of climate field schools in Indramayu, Indonesia. Cult Agric Food Environ 33:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sørensen KH, Aune M, Hatling M (2000) Against linearity: on the cultural appropriation of science and technology. In: Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam, pp 237–257Google Scholar
  47. Stern PC, Easterling WE (eds) (1999) Making climate forecasts matter. National AcademiesGoogle Scholar
  48. Tall A, Coulibaly JY, Diop M (2018) Do climate services make a difference? A review of evaluation methodologies and practices to assess the value of climate information services for farmers: implications for Africa. Clim ServGoogle Scholar
  49. Tall A, Hansen J, Jay A, et al (2014) Scaling up climate services for farmers: mission possible. Learning from good practice in Africa and South AsiaGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomlinson J, Rhiney K (2017) Assessing the role of farmer field schools in promoting pro-adaptive behaviour towards climate change among Jamaican farmers. J Environ Stud Sci:1–13Google Scholar
  51. Tuler SP, Dow K, Webler T, Whitehead J (2017) Learning through participatory modeling: reflections on what it means and how it is measured. In: Environmental modeling with stakeholders. Springer, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  52. Vaughan C, Dessai S (2014) Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vincent K, Daly M, Scannell C, Leathes B (2018) What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production? Clim Serv 12:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vogel C, O’Brien K (2006) Who can eat information? Examining the effectiveness of seasonal climate forecasts and regional climate-risk management strategies. Clim Res 33:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Winarto YT, Stigter K, Prahara H et al (2011) Collaborating on establishing an agro-meteorological learning situation among farmers in Java. In: Anthropological forum. Taylor & Francis, pp 175–197Google Scholar
  56. Zeid A, Egeland J, Chissano J (2011) Climate knowledge for action: a global framework for climate services and empowering the most vulnerable. World Meteorological OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  57. Ziervogel G, Downing TE (2004) Stakeholder networks: improving seasonal climate forecasts. Clim Chang 65:73–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of the EnvironmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations