The visual framing of climate change impacts and adaptation in the IPCC assessment reports
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is a key source on climate change information. How the IPCC presents and frames this climate information influences how policymakers and various stakeholders worldwide perceive climate change and make decisions accordingly. Visuals are powerful components in this communication. Here, we assess how the visuals (N = 702) in the IPCC Working Group II Assessment Reports frame climate impacts and adaptation. We find that visuals are largely framed as distant in time and space and predominantly portray the threats of climate change rather than possible goals to be achieved. Furthermore, conceptually, they are largely narrow, science-oriented instead of showing a broader multi-impact or multi-strategy evaluation of the impacts on society and necessary adaptations. They primarily depicted what the impacts and adaptations were, with minimal attention to who was impacted or needed to take adaption actions or adopt responsibility. Very few of the visuals in WG II (N = 48, 6.5%) focus on adaptation and those that did often do not show a clear theme, spatial or temporal scale. Our findings suggest that IPCC visuals (still) focus primarily on showing that climate change is real and a problem, with little solution-oriented communication. We recommend that the IPCC pays explicit attention to its visual framing and that approaches are developed to better visualise adaptation.
We thank Catherine van Gessel for conducting a pilot study, and Rasmus Slaattelid and other FIGO/UC4A partners for feedback throughout the study.
Supplementary information is available in the online version of the paper. Correspondence and requests for material can be addressed to AW.
AW and SL conceived the study, developed the analytical protocol and coding scheme and collected, coded and analysed the data. All authors contributed to writing the paper.
The discussions and research visits that led to this paper were supported through two projects funded by the Research Council of Norway (RCN)’s SAMKUL program: FIGO: ‘Go Figure: Visualising climate change’ (246903/F10) and UC4A: ‘Understanding cultural conditions for climate change adaptation’ (246891/F10).
Compliance with ethical standards
Competing financial interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Berkhout F, van den Hurk B et al (2014) Framing climate uncertainty: socio-economic and climate scenarios in vulnerability and adaptation assessments. Reg Environ Chang 14:879–893Google Scholar
- Fünfgeld H, McEvoy D (2011) Framing climate change adaptation in policy and practice. Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Hansen A, Machin D (2013) Researching Visual Environmental Communication. Environ Commun 7(2):151-168Google Scholar
- Hulme M (2009) Mediating the messages about climate change: reporting the IPCC fourth assessment in the UK print media. In: Boyce T, Lewis J (eds) Climate change and the media Peter Lang, pp 117–128Google Scholar
- IAC (2010) Climate change assessments: review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC. InterAcademy Council, Amsterdam 2010 Aug 30Google Scholar
- IPCC (1990) Climate change. Australian Government Publishing Service, Camberra, Australia, The IPCC impacts assessmentGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (1991) Climate change: the IPCC response strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (1995) Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptation and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical aspects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – part a: global and sectoral aspects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – part B: regional aspects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2016) IPCC communications strategy: adopted by the panel at the thirty-fifth session (Geneva, 6-9 June 2012), amended at the forty-fourth session (Bangkok, 17-20 October 2016). https://www.ipcc.ch/meeting_documentation/pdf/Communication/IPCC_Communications_Strategy.pdf accessed 12 November 2018
- IPCC (2017) Chapter outline of the working group II contribution to the IPCC sixth assessment report. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/AR6_WGII_outlines_P46.pdf
- IPCC (n.d.-a) Preparing reports. https://www.ipcc.ch/about/preparingreports/ Accessed 12 May 2019
- IPCC. (n.d.-b) Working groups. https://www.ipcc.ch/working-groups/. Accessed 12 May 2019
- Lynn J, Araya M, et al (2016) IPCC expert meeting on communication: meeting report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Mastrandrea MD, Field CB, et al (2010) Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertaintiesGoogle Scholar
- Moser SC, Dilling L (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174Google Scholar
- Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:12–23Google Scholar
- Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Powell TE, Boomgaarden HG, De Swert K, De Vreese CH (2015) A Clearer Picture: The Contribution of Visuals and Text to Framing Effects. J Commun 65(6):997-1017Google Scholar
- Saldaña J (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Schäfer M, O’Neill S (2017) Frame analysis in climate change communication. In: Nisbet M et al (eds) Oxford encyclopedia of climate change communication. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Schneider B (2016) Burning worlds of cartography: a critical approach to climate cosmograms of the Anthropocene. Geo: Geogr Environ 3(2):e00027Google Scholar
- Schneider B, Nocke T (2014) Image politics of climate change. Transcript-Verlag, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
- Schön DA, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
- Van Beek LMG, Metze-Burghouts TAP, Wardekker JA (2019) Visualisaties met invloed: Een analyse van de condities in het maakproces en de doorwerking van PBL-visualisaties. Universiteit Utrecht & Wageningen UniversiteitGoogle Scholar
- Wardekker JA (2004) Risk communication on climate change. Dissertation, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Wozniak A, Wessler H, Lück J (2017) Who prevails in the visual framing contest about the United Nations climate change conferences? Journal Stud 18(11):1433–1452Google Scholar