Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 511–532 | Cite as

Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability

  • Debra JavelineEmail author
  • Tracy Kijewski-Correa
  • Angela Chesler
Article

Abstract

Public attitudes toward climate change are the subject of considerable study. An essential and understudied question is whether these attitudes influence public behavior. We answer this question with respect to a particular behavior, action to protect coastal homes from the increasing risk of hurricanes and rising seas. Coastal homeowner behavior is critically important because homeowner risk reduction in most cases is not mandated by government regulations or insurance requirements and instead largely reflects individual voluntary decisions. Analyzing novel data from the 2017 Coastal Homeowner Survey of 662 respondents in one of the most frequently exposed US coastal communities, New Hanover County, North Carolina, we find that climate change knowledge and attitudes have no significant effect on the existing level of a home’s structural vulnerability nor on homeowner actions or stated intentions to reduce structural vulnerability in the future. We discuss the implications for efforts by governments, insurance companies, and other stakeholders advocating for coastal resiliency.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Notre Dame’s Environmental Change Initiative (ECI) and its Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN) for the pilot of the Coastal Homeowner Survey in North Carolina, and they gratefully acknowledge the helpful research assistance of Carolyn Yvellez and John Haley and insightful comments of David Konisky. The authors recognize the ongoing collaboration with the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS) and with their partnering survey research firm, SSRS. The first author recognizes the support of the Andrew W. Mellon New Directions Fellowship for training in ecology and environmental law.

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2513_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (4.5 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 4608 kb)
10584_2019_2513_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (5.9 mb)
ESM 2 (PDF 6090 kb)
10584_2019_2513_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (77 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 77 kb)
10584_2019_2513_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (355 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 354 kb)
10584_2019_2513_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (2.7 mb)
ESM 5 (PDF 2761 kb)
10584_2019_2513_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (9.9 mb)
ESM 6 (PDF 10132 kb)

References

  1. AAPOR (2015) Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. American Association for Public Opinion Research, Oakbrook TerraceGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander KS, Ryan A, Measham TG (2012) Managed retreat of coastal communities: understanding responses to projected sea level rise. J Environ Plan Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.604193
  3. Allison M (2017) Are coastal areas ready for rising seas? Zillow. https://www.zillow.com/research/coastal-areas-preparing-rising-seas-17023/. Accessed 17 May 2019
  4. Attari SZ, DeKay ML, Davidson CI, Bruine de Bruin W (2010) Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001509107
  5. Bain PG, Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1532
  6. Barnes R, Lytle B, Rogers S et al (2018) Hurricane Florence: field assessment team 1 (FAT-1) early access reconnaissance report (EARR). DesignSafe-CI https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2TT3G Accessed 4 August 2019
  7. Bichard E, Kazmierczak A (2012) Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0257-8
  8. Bolin JL, Hamilton LC (2018) The news you choose: news media preferences amplify views on climate change. Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1423909
  9. Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher A (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Underst Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
  10. Bradford RA, O’Sullivan J, van der Craats IM et al (2012) Risk perception—issues for flood management in Europe. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2299-2012
  11. Brenkert-Smith H, Meldrum JR, Champ PA (2015) Climate change beliefs and hazard mitigation behaviors: homeowners and wildfire risk. Environ Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2015.1080656
  12. Carmichael JT, Brulle RJ (2017) Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433
  13. Carmichael JT, Brulle RJ, Huxster J (2017) The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1
  14. Chatterjee C, Flugman E, Jiang F et al (2019) Insights from a stated preference experiment of Florida residents: role of information and incentives in hurricane risk mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000316
  15. Corner A, Whitmarsh L, Xenias D (2012) Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6
  16. Craig RK (2018) Coastal adaptation, government subsidized insurance, and perverse incentives to stay. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2203-5
  17. Dessai S, Sims C (2010) Public perception of drought and climate change in southeast England. Environ Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2010.0037
  18. Drummond C, Fischhoff B (2017) Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114
  19. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2017) Climate change: US public opinion. Annu Rev Polit Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857
  20. EPA (2016) What climate change means for North Carolina. EPA 430-F-16-035Google Scholar
  21. Feldman L, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2012) Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. Int J Press/Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
  22. Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change". Personal Soc Psychol Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
  23. FLASH (2018) Big research—understanding how to better motivate homeowners, 2018 National Disaster Resilience Conference: Commemorating Two Decades of Disaster Safety, Federal Alliance for Safe Homes, Clearwater Beach, FL, 7–9 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  24. Ge Y, Peacock WG, Lindell MK (2011) Florida households’ expected responses to hurricane hazard mitigation incentives. Risk Anal.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01606.x
  25. Gifford R, Comeau LA (2011) Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004
  26. Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc Natl Acad Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218453110
  27. Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
  28. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Lemcke-Stampone M et al (2015) Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138208
  29. Hart PS, Nisbet EC (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun Res.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
  30. Harvatt J, Petts J, Chilvers J (2011) Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. J Risk Res.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.503935
  31. Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RET (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap.  https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.13
  32. Howell RA (2011) Lights, camera . . . action? Altered attitudes and behaviour in response to the climate change film The Age of Stupid. Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.004
  33. Insurance Information Institute (2019) Facts + Statistics: US catastrophes. http://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/catastrophes-us. Accessed 5 August 2019
  34. IBHS (2018) Rating the states 2018: an assessment of residential building code and enforcement systems for life safety and property protection in hurricane-prone regions. Atlantic and Gulf coast states. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety, TampaGoogle Scholar
  35. IBHS (2019) Fortified home hurricane standards. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. https://fortifiedhome.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FORTIFIED-Home-Hurricane-Standards-2019.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2019
  36. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report, contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  37. Javeline D, Kijewski-Correa T (2019) Coastal homeowners in a changing climate. Clim Chang https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-018-2257-4
  38. Jasour ZY, Davidson RA, Trainor JE et al (2018) Homeowner decisions to retrofit to reduce hurricane-induced wind and flood damage. J Inf Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000452
  39. Kahan DM (2015) Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Adv Political Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
  40. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M et al (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
  41. Karlsson R (2012) Individual guilt or collective progressive action? Challenging the strategic potential of environmental citizenship theory. Environ Values.  https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13466893628102
  42. Kijewski-Correa TL, Kennedy AB, Taflanidis AA, Prevatt DO (2018) Field reconnaissance and overview of the impact of Hurricane Matthew on Haiti’s Tiburon Peninsula. Nat Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3410-0
  43. Koubi V, Spilker G, Schaffer L, Bernauer T (2016) Environmental stressors and migration: evidence from Vietnam. World Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.016
  44. Kreibich H (2011) Do perceptions of climate change influence precautionary measures? Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691111129011
  45. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C et al (2014) Americans’ actions to limit global warming. Yale University and George Mason University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  46. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C et al (2017) Climate change in the American mind. Yale University and George Mason University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
  48. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972621
  49. Lindell MK, Hwang SN (2008) Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x
  50. Lorenzen JA (2014) Convincing people to go green: managing strategic action by minimising political talk. Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.859778
  51. Lorenzoni I, Nicolson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK Public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
  52. Löw P (2018) Hurricanes cause record losses in 2017—the year in figures. Munich Re. https://www.munichre.com/topics-online/en/2018/01/2017-year-in-figures. Accessed 17 May 2019
  53. Maibach EW, Nisbet M, Baldwin P et al (2010) Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-299
  54. Maniates MF (2001) Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Glob Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395
  55. Marquart-Pyatt ST, Shwom RL, Dietz T et al (2011) Understanding public opinion on climate change: a call for research. Environment. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00139157.2011.588555#
  56. McCright AM, Riley E, Dunlap RE (2011a) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1488516
  57. McCright AM, Riley E, Dunlap RE (2011b) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
  58. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2013) Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
  59. McNamara DE, Keller A (2013) A coupled physical and economic model of the response of coastal real estate to climate risk. Nat Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1826
  60. Mildenberger M, Tingley D (2017) Beliefs about climate beliefs: the importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. Br J Polit Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321
  61. Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process, and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
  62. Moser SC, Dilling L (2004) Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environ 46(10): 32–46Google Scholar
  63. NIBS (2017) Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2017 interim report. National Institute of Building Sciences, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  64. Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment.  https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
  65. NOAA (2013) National coastal population report: population trends from 1970 to 2020. NOAA’s state of the coast. https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/training/population-report.html Accessed 11 September 2018
  66. Peacock WG (2003) Hurricane mitigation status and factors influencing mitigation status among Florida’s single-family homeowners. Nat Hazards Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(149)
  67. Peacock WG, Brody SD, Highfield W (2005) Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida’s single family homeowners. Landsc Urban Plan.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
  68. Peguero AA (2006) Latino disaster vulnerability: the dissemination of hurricane mitigation information among Florida’s homeowners. Hisp J Behav Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986305284012
  69. Petrovic N, Madrigano J, Zaval L (2014) Motivating mitigation: when health matters more than climate change. Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1192-2
  70. Pidgeon N (2012) Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Clim Pol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.702982
  71. Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080
  72. Rainey C (2014) Arguing for a negligible effect. Am J Polit Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12102
  73. Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D, Morgan MG (2010) Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.x
  74. Roser-Renouf C, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A, Rosenthal S (2016) Global warming, God, and the “end times”. Yale University and George Mason University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  75. Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  76. Sanders RM (2010) Separating fact from fiction: insurance claims and building envelope failure. J Archit Technol Hoffman Archit 27(2):1–8Google Scholar
  77. Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
  78. Shao W (2017) Weather, climate, politics, or God? Determinants of American public opinions toward global warming. Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1223190
  79. Shao W, Keim BD, Garand JC, Hamilton LC (2014) Weather, climate, and the economy: explaining risk perceptions of global warming, 2001–2010. Weather, Clim, and Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00029.1
  80. Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Eniron Plan A.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282
  81. Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Glob Environ Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003
  82. Smith AB, Matthews JL (2015) Quantifying uncertainty and variable sensitivity within the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster cost estimates. Nat Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x
  83. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
  84. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
  85. Stanford Report (2013) Stanford survey: Americans back preparation for extreme weather and sea-level rise. https://news.stanford.edu/pr/2013/pr-woods-adaptation-survey-032813.html. Accessed 5 August 2019
  86. Stanford University Climate Adaptation National Poll (2013) https://pprggw.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/climate-adaptation-results-topline.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2019
  87. Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162574
  88. Stott P (2016) How climate change affects extreme weather events. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7271
  89. Sweet WV, Dusek G, Obeysekera J, Marra JJ (2018) Patterns and projections of high tide flooding along the U.S. coastline using a common impact threshold. NOAA. NOS CO-OPS 086 https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/techrpt86_PaP_of_HTFlooding.pdf
  90. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  91. Tobler C, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2012) Addressing climate change: determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. J Environ Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001
  92. US Census Bureau (2016a) Historical census of housing tables. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html Accessed 29 January 2019
  93. US Census Bureau (2016b) State & county quick facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217. Accessed 11 September 2018
  94. van Burren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  95. Walsh KJE, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ et al (2016) Tropical cyclones and climate change. WIREs Clim Change.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.371
  96. Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
  97. Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235
  98. Whitmarsh L (2009) Behavioural responses to climate change: asymmetry of intentions and impacts. J Environ Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003
  99. Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S (2010) Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
  100. Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920600835528
  101. Zhou J (2016) Boomerangs versus javelins: how polarization constrains communication on climate change. Environ Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1166602

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Change InitiativeUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  3. 3.Kroc Institute for International Peace StudiesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences and Keough School of Global AffairsUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  5. 5.Real Estate InstituteUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations