Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 621–637 | Cite as

Barriers and drivers to adaptation to climate change—a field study of ten French local authorities

  • Guillaume SimonetEmail author
  • Alexia Leseur
Article

Abstract

Local authorities are intensifying efforts to design climate policy that includes effective climate change adaptation. However, the translation of policy into effective actions that transform territories faces barriers, and is proving to be a true challenge. Through the findings of 2 years of field research (ABSTRACT-colurba project), based on the study of ten French local authorities, this paper discusses the main barriers that decision-makers are confronted with, and the drivers by which they may succeed or which could trigger more efficient actions at the local level. Once again, this study confirms that barriers are mainly reported at the resource, governance, and awareness levels. Thus, the reduction of subsidies from national government, the priority given to economic criteria and the lack of awareness of climate issues are among the main barriers. Potential and successful drivers are mainly reported at the organisational level. Indeed, the necessity to reorganise the way local public institutions are working to implement climate policy is highlighted as an important lever to overcome certain obstacles. We conclude that research on barriers and drivers to climate change adaptation is essential to better understand why efforts are so slow to take into consideration the obvious acceleration of the manifestations of climate change. But we also recommend focusing on the human factors involved into the decision-making processes, at the collective (organisational) as well as the individual (perception) level, to better relate the findings to stakeholders and to find ways to integrate them into action-research projects in order to accelerate an urgent transformation of urban systems into sustainable systems.

Notes

References

  1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Barnett J (2009) Commentary: four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Environ Plan A 41:2800–2805Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. In: Papers of the social dimensions of climate change workshop. The World Bank, Washington DC, March 5–6, 2008Google Scholar
  4. Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation - a question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 28(2):276–289Google Scholar
  5. Balaban O, Senol Balaban M (2015) Adaptation to climate change: barriers in the Turkish local context in the Turkish Local Context. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 8:7–22Google Scholar
  6. Barnett J, Waters E, Pendergast S, Puleston A (2013) Barriers to adaptation to sea level rise. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazerman MH (2006) Climate change as a predictable surprise. Clim Chang 77:179–193Google Scholar
  8. Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3(1):91–106Google Scholar
  9. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Chang 21(1):25–33Google Scholar
  10. Biesbroek GR (2014a) Challenging barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation. Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesbroek GR, Termeer CJA, Klostermann JEM, Kabat P (2014b) Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19(7):1011-1032Google Scholar
  12. Brewer GD (2007) Inventing the future: scenarios, imagination, maestry and control. Sustain Sci 2:159–177Google Scholar
  13. Burch S (2010a) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 20:287–197Google Scholar
  14. Burch S (2010b) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38(12):7575–7585Google Scholar
  15. Ng K, Campos I, Penha-Lopes G (eds) (2016) BASE adaptation inspiration book: 23 European cases of climate change adaptation to inspire European decision-makers, practitioners and citizens. Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, p 145Google Scholar
  16. Clarke D, Murphy C, Lorenzoni I (2016) Barriers to transformative adaptation: responses to flood risk in Ireland. Journal of Extreme Events 3(02):1650010Google Scholar
  17. Crabbé P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in Eastern Ontario. Clim Chang 78(1):103–133Google Scholar
  18. Dannevig H, Rauken T, Hovelsrud G (2012) Implementing adaptation to climate change at the local level. Local Environment 17 (6-7):597–611Google Scholar
  19. Dovers SR, Hezri AA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(2):212–231Google Scholar
  20. Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2011) Les barrières à la mise en oeuvre des politiques d’adaptation au changement climatique: le cas de la Suisse. Swiss Political Science Review 17(2):188–219Google Scholar
  21. Dupuis J, Biesbroek R (2013) Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1476–1487Google Scholar
  22. Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffmann E, Klein RJ, Oberlack C, Pechan A, Rotter M, Termeer CJ (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change 4(10):867–872Google Scholar
  23. Ekstrom JA, Moser SC et al (2011) Barriers to climate change adaptation: a diagnostic framework—final project report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  24. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106(2):327–336Google Scholar
  25. Füssel HM (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275Google Scholar
  26. Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A (2011) Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(6):801–827Google Scholar
  27. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory, strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15(3):199–213Google Scholar
  29. Huang C, Vaneckova P, Wang X, Fitzgerald G, Guo Y, Tong S (2011) Constraints and barriers to public health adaptation to climate change: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 40(2):183–190Google Scholar
  30. Hulme PE (2005) Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of a global threat? J Appl Ecol 42:784–794Google Scholar
  31. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds), Cambridge (UK), New York, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Ivey JL, Smithers J, De Loë RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community capacity for adaptation to climate induced water shortages: linking institutional complexity and local actors. Environ Manag 33(1):36–47Google Scholar
  34. Jantarasami LC, Lawler JJ, Thomas CW (2010) Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in U.S. national parks and forests. Ecol Soc 15(4):33Google Scholar
  35. Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory Culture Society 27(2–3):233–253Google Scholar
  36. Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Chang 21(4):1262–1274Google Scholar
  37. Jones RN, Patwardhan A, Cohen SJ, Dessai S, Lammel A, Lempert RJ, Mirza MMQ, von Storch H (2014) Foundations for decision making. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–228Google Scholar
  38. Juhola S (2010) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation. In: Keskitalo ECH (ed) Developing adaptation policy and practice in Europe: multilevel governance of climate change. Springer, London, pp 149–188Google Scholar
  39. Lammel AM (2015) Climate change: from perception to action. Ecologie PolitiqueGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawrence J, Sullivan F, Lash A, Ide G, Cameron C, McGlinchey L (2015) Adapting to changing climate risk by local government in New Zealand: institutional practice barriers and enablers. Local Environ 20(3):298–320Google Scholar
  41. Lehmann P, Brenck M, Gebhardt O, Schaller S, Süßbauer E (2013) Barriers and opportunities for urban adaptation planning: analytical framework and evidence from cities in Latin America and Germany. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20(1):75–97Google Scholar
  42. Leseur A, Depoues V, Bordier C, Rosensweig C, Pacteau C, Abbadie L, Ali Ibrahim S (2015) Scientific brief on the implications of local and regional jurisdictions for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: how can they enhance engagement of their constituents? State of science and focus on economic and financial tools. Scientific brief for the LPAA, Cop 21, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Lesnikowski A, Ford J, Biesbroek R, Berrang-Ford L, jody Heymann S (2016) National-level progress on adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 6(3):261Google Scholar
  44. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang 17(3–4):445–459Google Scholar
  45. Matasci C, Kruse S, Barawid N and Thalmann P (2014) Exploring barriers to climate change adaptation in the Swiss tourism sector. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 19:1239-1254Google Scholar
  46. Measham T, Preston B, Smith T, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 16:889-909Google Scholar
  47. Mimura N, Nurse L, McLean R, Agard J, Briguglio L, Lefale P, Payet R, Sem G (2007) Small islands. Clim Chang 16:687–716.Google Scholar
  48. Moser SC (2010) Now more than ever: the need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Appl Geogr 30(4):464–474Google Scholar
  49. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031Google Scholar
  50. Naess LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway: adaptation to climate change: perspectives across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):125–138Google Scholar
  51. Norgaard KM (2006) “We don’t really want to know”: environmental justice and socially organised denial of global warming in Norway. Organisation and Environment 19:347Google Scholar
  52. Oberlack C (2017) Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 22(5):805–838Google Scholar
  53. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Chang 9:81–93Google Scholar
  54. O'Toole LJ (1986) Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: an assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy 6(2):181–210Google Scholar
  55. Pielke R, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D (2007) Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445:597–598Google Scholar
  56. Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 16(4):407–438Google Scholar
  57. Rayner T, Jordan A (2013) The European Union: the polycentric climate policy leader? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4(2):75–90Google Scholar
  58. Reckien D, Flacke J, Olazabal M and Heidrich O (2015) The influence of drivers and barriers on urban adaptation and mitigation plans—an empirical analysis of European cities. PLoS One 10(8): e0135597Google Scholar
  59. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S (2010) Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature 467(7318):909–911Google Scholar
  60. Simonet G (2011) Enjeux et dynamiques de la mise en œuvre de stratégies d’adaptation aux changements climatiques en milieu urbain, les cas de Montréal et Paris. Université du Québec à Montréal, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  61. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development 9–28Google Scholar
  62. Simonet G, Leseur A (2015) Analyse des Barrières et leviers à la mise en place de STRatégies d’Adaptation aux Changements climaTiques, le cas des collectivités urbaines, Rapport final ABSTRACT-colurba, I4CE, ADEME et AFD, 140 pGoogle Scholar
  63. Simonet G (2015) Une brève histoire de l’adaptation : l’évolution conceptuelle au fil des rapports du GIEC (1990-2014). Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 23:52–64Google Scholar
  64. Simonet G, Fatorić S (2016) Does “adaptation to climate change” mean resignation or opportunity? Reg Environ Chang 16(3):789–799Google Scholar
  65. Simonet G, Salles D (2014) Eau et changement climatique en Garonne moyenne : l’adaptation en négociation. Sud-Ouest Européen 37:53–62Google Scholar
  66. Smith JB, Vogel JM, Iii JEC (2009) An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment. Clim Chang 95(1–2):53–61Google Scholar
  67. Stedman RC (2004) Risk and climate change: perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Anal 24(5):1395–1406Google Scholar
  68. Swart R, Biesbroeck R, Binnerup S et al (2009) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Partnership for European Environmental Research, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  69. Tompkins EL, Adger NW, Boyd E, Nicholson-Cole S, Weatherhead K, Arnell N (2010) Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):627–635Google Scholar
  70. Tribbia J, Moser SC (2008) More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environmental Science & Policy 2008 11(4):315–328Google Scholar
  71. Wilbanks T, Sathaye J (2007) Integrating mitigation and adaptation as responses to climate change: a synthesis. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12:957–962Google Scholar
  72. Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65:180–185Google Scholar
  73. Yohe GE, Malone A, Brenkert M, Schlesinger H, Xing MX, Lee D (2006) A synthetic assessment of the global distribution of vulnerability to climate change from the IPCC perspective that reflects exposure and adaptive capacity. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, PalisadesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires (LISST-UMR 5193)Université de Toulouse Jean JaurèsToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Institute for Climate Economics (I4CE)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations