Climatic Change

, Volume 156, Issue 1–2, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Potential male leatherback hatchlings exhibit higher fitness which might balance sea turtle sex ratios in the face of climate change

  • Marga L. RivasEmail author
  • Nicole Esteban
  • Adolfo Marco


Sea turtles are vertebrates with temperature-dependent sex determination. Rising temperatures due to climate change cause female-biased sex ratios. We have assessed the influence of nest depth and shading conditions on nest temperatures and hatchling fitness of the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea). We relocated 48 leatherback clutches into a hatchery in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Of these, 24 clutches were placed under shade conditions and 24 were placed under unshaded (sun) conditions at three depths (50, 75, 90 cm). Fitness (as measured by greater carapace length, carapace width and hatchling weight) and locomotion performance (faster crawling and shorter righting responses) were better in leatherback hatchlings from the cooler, shaded nests than in those from the warmer, unshaded nests. In 2013, in clutches at a depth of 50 cm, hatching success was higher for the shaded clutches (79.68% ± 15.32%) than for the unshaded clutches (38.39% ± 34.35), while in clutches at deeper depths unshaded clutches had higher hatching success (35.58% ± 24.01%) than shaded clutches (60.62% ± 12.21%). Our results show that shaded conditions produced hatchlings with a higher fitness and a higher likelihood of being male. Therefore, our results can be used to provide conservation policies with a tool to decrease the current female-skewed sex ratio production caused by rising temperatures at most nesting rookeries around the world.


Climate change Conservation Endangered species Global warming Incubation period Marine turtles Reproductive output 



We thank John Denham and Director Carlos Fernandez for the management of PNR and their involvement in conservation projects. We also thank all coordinators, assistants and volunteers who worked at PNR over the years for their full dedication to the experiments. We thank Dr. Manuel Spinola for support in the analysis of data. The work was also supported by an international mobility grants for prestigious researchers by AIUP and by CEIMAR International Campus of Excellence of the Sea. Research permits were obtained from the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) of Costa Rica (R-SINAC-ACLAC-PIME- 009-2013).

Author contributions

MLR and AM conceived and designed the experiments. MLR performed the experiments and analyzed the data. MLR wrote the manuscript and AM and NE revised the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2462_MOESM1_ESM.docx (85 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 85 kb)


  1. Bell BA, Spotila JR, Paladino FV, Reina RD (2004) Low reproductive success of leatherbackturtles, Dermochelys coriacea, is due to high embryonic mortality. Biol Conserv 115:131–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth DT, Evans A (2011) Warm water and cool nests are best. How global warming might influence hatchling green turtle swimming performance. PLoS One 6(8):e23162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth DT, Feeney R, Shibata Y (2013) Nest and maternal origin can influence morphology and locomotor performance of hatchling green turtles (Chelonia mydas) incubated in field nests. Mar Biol 160:127–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgess EA, Booth DT, Lanyon JM (2006) Swimming performance of hatchling green turtles is affected by incubation temperature. Coral Reefs 25:341–349. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chevalier J, Godfrey MH, Girondot M (1999) Significant difference of temperature-dependent sex determination between French Guiana (Atlantic) and playa Grande (Costa-Rica, Pacific) leatherbacks (Dermochelys coriacea). Ann Sci Nat Zool Biol Anim 20:147–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu CT, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2008) Estimating the sex ratio of loggerhead turtle hatchling at Mon Repos rookery (Australia) from nest temperatures. Aust J Zool 56(1):57–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crim JL, Spotila LD, Spotila JR, O’Connor M, Reina R, Williams CJ, Paladino FV (2002) The leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea exhibits both polyandry and polygyny. Mol Ecol 11:2097–2106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delmas V, Baudry E, Girondot M, Prevot-Julliard AC (2007) The righting response as a fitness index in freshwater turtles. Biol J Linn Soc 91:99–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutton DL, Dutton PH, Chaloupka M, Boulon RH (2005) Increase of a Caribbean leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea nesting population linked to long-term nest protection. Biol Conserv 126:186–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernandez-Chacón A, Bertolero A, Amengual A, Tavecchia G, Homar V, Oro D (2011) Spatial heterogeneity in the effects of climate change on the population dynamics of a Mediterranean tortoise. Glob Chang Biol 17:3075–3088. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher LR, Godfrey MH, Owens DW (2014) Incubation temperature effects on hatchling performance in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). PLoS One 9:e114880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuentes MMPB, Maynard JA, Guinea M, Bell IP, Werdell PJ, Hamann M (2009) Proxy indicators of sand temperature help project impacts of global warming on sea turtles in northern Australia. Endanger Species Res 9:33–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrett K, Wallace BP, Garner J, Paladino FV (2010) Variations in leatherback turtle nest environments: consequences for hatching success. Endanger Species Res 11:147–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girondot M, Godfrey MH, Ponge L, Rivalan P (2007) Modeling approaches to quantify leatherback nesting trends in French Guiana and Suriname. Chelonian Conserv Biol 6:37–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Girondot M, Monsinjon J, Guillon J-M (2018) Delimitation of the embryonic thermosensitive period for sex determination using an embryo growth model reveals a potential bias for sex ratio prediction in turtles. J Therm Biol 73:32–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glen F, Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Hays GC (2003) Incubation environment affects the phenotype of naturally incubated green turtle hatchlings. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83(5):1183–1186Google Scholar
  17. Godfrey MH, Barreto R, Mrosovsky N (1996) Estimating past and present sex ratios of sea turtles in Suriname. Can J Zool 74:267–277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grayson KL, Mitchell NJ, Monks JM, Keall SN, Wilson JN et al (2014) Sex ratio Bias and extinction risk in an isolated population of tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). PLoS One 9:e94214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ (2007) Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on marine turtle population. Glob Chang Biol 13:923–932. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ (2009) Climate change and marine turtles. Endanger Species Res 7:137–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hays GC, Fossette S, Katselidis KA, Schofield G, Gravenor MB (2010) Breeding periodicity for male seaturtles, operational sex ratios, and implications in the face of climate change. Conserv Biol 24:1636–1643. . 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01531.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hays GC, Mazaris AD, Schofield G (2014) Different male vs. female breeding periodicity helps mitigate offspring sex ratio skews in sea turtles. Front Mar Sci 1:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hays GC, Mazaris AD, Schofield G, Laloë JO (2017) Population viability at extreme sex-ratio skews produced by temperature-dependent sex determination. Proc Biol Sci 284(1848). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hewavisenthi S, Parmenter CJ (2001) Influence of incubation environment on the development of the Flatback turtle (Natator depressus). Copeia 2001:668–682.
  25. Hill JE, Paladino FV, Spotila JR, Tomillo PS (2015) Shading and watering as a tool to mitigate the impacts of climate change in sea turtle nests. PLoS One 10:e0129528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houghton JDR, Myers AE, Lloyd C, King RS, Isaacs C, Hays GC (2007) Protracted rainfall decreases temperature within leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) clutches in Grenada, West Indies: ecological implications for a species displaying temperature dependent sex determination. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 345:71–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard R, Bell I, Pike DA (2014) Thermal tolerances of sea turtle embryos: current understanding and future directions. Endanger Species Res 26:75–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hulin V, Delmas V, Girondot M, Godfrey M, Guillon JM (2009) Temperature-dependent sex determination and global change: are some species at greater risk? Oecologia 160:493–506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate Change 2013. The physical science basis (Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al., eds). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Ischer T, Ireland K, Booth DT (2009) Locomotion performance of green turtle hatchlings from the Heron Island rookery. Great Barrier Reef Mar Biol 156:1399–1409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janzen FJ (1994) Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7487–7490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janzen FJ, Tucker JK, Paukstis GL (2000) Experimental analysis of an early life-history stage : selection on body size of hatchling turtles? Funct Ecol 81:2290–2304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jourdan J, Fuentes MMPB (2015) Effectiveness of strategies at reducing sand temperature to mitigate potential impacts from changes in environmental temperature on sea turtle reproductive output. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:121–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kraemer JE, Bell R (1980) Rain-induced mortality of eggs and hatchlings of Loggerhead Sea turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Georgia coast. Herpetologica 36:72–77
  35. Laloë J-O, Cozens J, Renom B, Taxonera A, Hays GC (2014) Effects of rising temperature on the viability of an important sea turtle rookery. Nat Clim Chang 4:513–518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laloë J-O, Esteban N, Berkel J, Hays GC (2016) Sand temperatures for nesting sea turtles in the Caribbean: implications for hatchling sex ratios in the face of climate change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 474:92–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laloë J-O, Cozens J, Renom B, Taxonera A, Hays GC (2017) Climate change and temperature-linked hatchling mortality at a globally important sea turtle nesting site. Glob Chang Biol 23:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsuzawa Y, Sato K, Sakamoto W, Bjorndal KA (2002) Seasonal fluctuations in sand temperature: effects on the incubation period and mortality of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) pre-emergent hat- chlings in Minabe. Mar Biol 140:639–646. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maulany RI, Booth DT, Baxter GS (2012) The effect of incubation temperature on hatchling quality in the olive ridley turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea, from alas Purwo National Park, East Java, Indonesia: implications for hatchery management. Mar Biol 159:2651–2661. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGehee MA (1990) Effects of moisture on eggs and hatchlings of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Herpetologica 46:251–258
  41. Mickelson LE, Downie JR (2010) Influence of incubation temperature on morphology and locomotion performance of leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) hatchlings. Can J Zool 88:359–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller JD (1999) Determining clutch size and hatching success. In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication, Washington DC, pp 124–129Google Scholar
  43. Mitchel NJ, Allendorf FW, Keall SN, Daugherty CH, Nelson NJ (2010) Demographic effects of temperature-dependent sex determination: will tuatara survive global warming? Glob Chang Biol 16:60–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neuwald JL, Valenzuela N (2011) The lesser known challenge of climate change: thermal variance and sex-reversal in vertebrates with temperature-dependent sex determination. PLoS One 6:e18117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ospina-Alvarez N, Piferrer F (2008) Temperature-dependent sex determination in fish revisited: prevalence, a single sex ratio response pattern, and possible effects of climate change. PLoS One 3:e2837. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patiño-Martínez J, Marco A, Quiñones L, Hawkes L (2012) A potential tool to mitigate the impacts of climate change to the Caribbean leatherback sea turtle. Glob Chang Biol 18:401–411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patino-Martinez J, Marco A, Quiñones L, Hawkes LA (2014) The potential future influence of sea level rise on leatherback turtle nests. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 461:116–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pieau C, Mrosovsky N (1991) Transitional range of temperature, pivotal temperatures and thermosensitive stages for sex determination in reptiles. Amphibia-Reptilia 12:169–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pike DA (2013a) Climate influences the global distribution of sea turtle nesting. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:555–566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pike DA (2013b) Forecasting range expansion into ecological traps: climate-mediated shifts in sea turtle nesting beaches and human development. Glob Chang Biol 19:3082–3092. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pike DA (2014) Forecasting the viability of sea turtle eggs in a warming world. Glob Chang Biol 20:7–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pike DA, Roznik EA, Bell I (2015) Nest inundation from sea-level rise threatens sea turtle population viability subject category: subject areas : author for correspondence. R Soc Open Sci 2:1–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
  54. Read T, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2012) Effect of nest temperature on hatchling phenotype of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from two South Pacific rookeries, Mon Repos and la Roche Percée. Aust J Zool 60:402–411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rivas ML, Marco A (2016) The effect of dune vegetation on leatherback hatchling's sea-finding ability. Mar Biol 163(1).
  56. Rivas ML, Santidrian P, Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Marco A (2016a) Potential effects of dune scarps caused by beach erosion on the nesting behaviour of leatherback turtles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 551:239–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rivas ML, Fernández C, Marco A (2016b) Nesting ecology and population trend of leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea at Pacuare nature reserve. Costa Rica Oryx 50:274–282. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rivas ML, Spínola M, Arrieta H, Faife-Cabrera M (2018) Effect of extreme climatic events resulting in prolonged precipitation on the reproductive output of sea turtles. Anim Conserv 21(5):387–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saba VS, Stock CA, Spotila JR, Paladino FV, Tomillo PS (2012) Projected response of an endangered marine turtle population to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:814–820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santidrián Tomillo P, Saba VS, Blanco GS, Stock CA, Paladino FV, Spotila JR (2012) Climate driven egg and hatchling mortality threatens survival of eastern Pacific leatherback turtles. PLoS One 7:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Santidrián Tomillo P, Genovart M, Paladino FV, Spotila JR, Oro D (2015a) Climate change overruns resilience conferred by temperature-dependent sex determination in sea turtles and threatens their survival. Glob Chang Biol 21:2980–2988. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Santidrián Tomillo P, Saba VS, Lombard CD et al (2015b) Global analysis of the effect of local climate on the hatchling output of leatherback turtles. Sci Rep 5:16789. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Santidrián Tomillo P, Fonseca L, Paladino FV, Spotila JR, Oro D (2017) Are thermal barriers “higher” in deep sea turtle nests? PLoS One 12:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Santidrián Tomillo P, Oro D, Paladino FV, Piedra R, Sieg AE, Spotila, JR (2014) High beach temperatures increased female-biased primary sex ratios but reduced output of female hatchlings in the leatherback turtle. Biol Conserv 176, 71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sim EL, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2015) Incubation temperature, morphology and performance in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtle hatchlings from Mon Repos, Queensland. Aust Biol Open 4:685–692. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Standora EA, Spotila JR (1985) Temperature dependent sex determination in sea turtles. Copeia 1985:711–722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stewart K, Sims M, Meylan A, Witherington B, Brost B, Crowder LB (2011) Leatherback nests increasing significantly in Florida, USA; trends assessed over 30 years using multilevel modeling. Ecol Appl 21:263–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steyermark AC, Spotila JR (2001) Body temperature and maternal identity affect snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) righting response. Copeia 4:1050–1057.
  69. Van de Merwe J, Ibrahim K, Whittier J (2005) Effects of hatchery shading and nest depth on the development and quality of Chelonia mydas hatchlings: implications for hatchery management in peninsular, Malaysia. Aust J Zool 53:205–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Houtan KS, Bass OL (2007) Stormy oceans are associated with declines in sea turtle hatching. Curr Biol 17:590–591. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber SB, Broderick AC, Groothuis TGG, Ellick J, Godley BJ, Blount JD (2012) Fine-scale thermal adaptation in a green turtle nesting population. Proc Biol Sci 279:1077–1084. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang HR (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wernberg T, Smale DA, Tuya F (2013) An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nat Clim Chang 3:78–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood A, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2014) Sun exposure, nest temperature and loggerhead turtle hatchlings: implications for beach shading management strategies at sea turtle rookeries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 451:105–114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Woolgar L, Trocini S, Mitchell N (2013) Key parameters describing temperature-dependent sex determination in the southernmost population of loggerhead sea turtles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 449:77–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wyneken J, Lolavar A (2015) Loggerhead sea turtle environmental sex determination: implications of moisture and temperature for climate change based predictions for species survival. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 324B:295–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yntema C, Mrosovsky N (1980) Sexual differentiation in hatchling loggerheads (Caretta caretta) incubated at different controlled temperatures. Herpetologica 36:33–36

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Scientific CollectionsUniversity of AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMarta Abreu de Las Villas UniversitySanta ClaraCuba
  3. 3.Bioscience DepartmentSwansea UniversityWalesUK
  4. 4.Department of Conservation of BiodiversityEstación Biológica de Doñana, CSICSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations