Advertisement

Micro-solutions to global problems: understanding social processes to eradicate energy poverty and build climate-resilient livelihoods

  • J David TàbaraEmail author
  • Takeshi Takama
  • Manisha Mishra
  • Lauren Hermanus
  • Sean Khaya Andrew
  • Pacia Diaz
  • Gina Ziervogel
  • Louis Lemkow
Article

Abstract

This research explores the agent dynamics, learning processes, and enabling conditions for the implementation of microscale win-win solutions that contribute to energy poverty eradication and climate resilience in a selection of low-income rural and peri-urban communities in India, Indonesia, and South Africa. We define these micro-solutions as energy-related interventions and resilience services or products—used at community, household, small production unit, or business level—that yield both economic and climatic gains. Our analysis identifies five elements critical for the robust design of these interventions: (i) The ability to collaborate and share different kinds of expertise with a range of networks operating at multiple levels of activity; (ii) The application of place-based systems-learning perspectives that enable project participants to integrate different types of solutions to meet different needs at the same time; (iii) The ability to yield tangible short-term benefits as part of long-term strategic visions and commitment; (iv) The use of novel technologies and financial instruments in ways that foreground the needs of poor populations; and (v) The inclusion and empowerment of economically marginalised groups through institutional and technological innovations and responsible business models. We conclude that the most critical aspect of successful micro win-win solutions is support for communities’ own endogenous transformative capacities as this helps ensure that solutions are shared and continuously adapted to changing conditions over time.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants to the workshops held in India, Indonesia and South Africa. This paper benefited from the thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Funding information

This research is part of the EU-funded H2020 project GREEN-WIN—Green Growth and Win-Win Strategies for Sustainable Climate Action (Grant Agreement No 642018; www.green-win-project.eu).

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2448_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 34725 kb)

References

  1. Agoramoorthy G, Hsu MJ (2016) Small dams revive dry rivers and mitigate local climate change in India’s drylands. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 8:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlborg H, Sjöstedt M (2015) Small-scale hydropower in Africa: socio-technical designs for renewable energy in Tanzanian villages. Energy Res Soc Sci 5:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anenberg SC, Balakrishnan K, Jetter J, Masera O, Mehta S, Moss J et al (2013) Cleaner cooking solutions to achieve health, climate, and economic cobenefits. Environ Sci Technol 47:3944–3952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhide A, Rodriguez Monroy C (2011) Energy poverty: a special focus on energy poverty in India and renewable energy technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(2):1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown D, McGranahan G (2016) The urban informal economy, local inclusion and achieving a global green transformation. Habitat Int 53:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra A, McNamara KE, Dargusch P (2017) Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings. Clim Pol 18(4):526–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GNESD (2013) Energy poverty in development countries’ urban poor communities. Assessments and recommendations. Country report 2013. Case Study South Africa. UCT South Africa & Riso Centre, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  8. Granoff I, Eis J, MacFarland W, Hoy C, Watson C, de Battista G et al (2015) Zero poverty, zero emissions: eradicating extreme poverty in the climate crisis. ODI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta AK (2016) Grassroots innovation: minds on the margin are not marginal minds. Random House India, GurgaonGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta J, Pouw N (2017) Towards a trans-disciplinary conceptualization of inclusive development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 24:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guruswamy L (2011) Energy poverty. Annu Rev Env Resour 36(1):139–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haider LJ, Boonstra WJ, Peterson GD, Schlüter M (2017) Traps and sustainable development in rural areas: a review. World Dev 101:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halff A, Sovacool BK, Rozhon J (2014) Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, Fay M, Kane T, Narloch U et al (2016) Shock waves: managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2017) WEO-2017 special report: energy access outlook. https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2017-special-report-energy-access-outlook
  16. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaeger CC, Hasselmann K, Leipold G, Mangalagiu D, Tàbara JD (2012) Reframing the problem of climate change: from zero sum game to win-win solutions. Earthscan. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Khandker SR, Barnes DF, Samad HA (2010) Energy poverty in rural and urban India: are the energy poor also income poor. World Bank, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lade SJ, Haider LJ, Engström G, Schlüter M (2017) Resilience offers escape from trapped thinking on poverty alleviation. Sci Adv 3(e1603043):1–11Google Scholar
  20. Leichenko R, Silva JA (2014) Climate change and poverty: vulnerability, impacts, and alleviation strategies. Climate Change 5:539–556.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.287 Google Scholar
  21. Marshall F, Dolley J, Priya R (2018) Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: enhancing propoor transformative agency in periurban contexts. Ecol Soc 23(3):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muttarak R, Lutz W (2014) Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? Ecol Soc 19(1):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsson L, Opondo M, Tschakert P et al. (2014) Livelihoods and poverty. In: IPCC, climate change 2014: impacts adaptation and vulnerability. CUP, Cambridge, pp 793–832Google Scholar
  24. Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups 2ed. Mass. Harvard UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Pachauri S, Spreng D (2011) Measuring and monitoring energy poverty. Energy Policy 39:7497–7504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereira LM, Karpouzoglou T, Frantzeskaki N, Olsson P (2018) Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 23(4):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pieterse E (2008) City futures: confronting the crisis of urban development. UCT press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  28. Pradhan A, Chan C, Roul PK, Halbrendt J, Sipes B (2018) Potential of conservation agriculture for climate change adaptation and food security under rainfed uplands of India: a transdisciplinary approach. Agric Syst 163:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rasul G, Sharma B (2016) The nexus approach to water-energy-food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Clim Pol 16:682–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shackleton S, Ziervogel G, Sallu S, Gill T, Tschakert P (2015) Why is socially-just climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa so challenging? A review of barriers identified from empirical cases. Climate Change 6:321–344Google Scholar
  31. Sovacool BK (2012) The political economy of energy poverty: a review of key challenges. Energy Sustain Dev 16(3):272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spagnoletti B, O’Callaghan T (2013) Let there be light: a multi-actor approach to alleviating energy poverty in Asia. Energy Policy 63:738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Speranza CI, Wiesmann U, Rist S (2014) An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics. Glob Environ Chang 28:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tàbara JD, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecol Soc 12(2):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tàbara JD, Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Pedde S, Lamperti F, Kok K, Christensen JH Jäger J, Berry P (2018) Positive tipping points for a rapidly warming world. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 31:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takama T, Setyani P, Aldrian E (2015) Climate change vulnerability to rice paddy production in Bali, Indonesia. In: Lael Filho W (ed) Handbook of climate change adaptation. Springer, Berlin, pp 1731–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tosun J, Schoenefeld JJ (2017) Collective climate action and networked climate governance Climate Change 8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.440
  38. UN (United Nations) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  39. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, a synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf
  40. UNEP (2015b) Eradicating poverty through an inclusive green economy: UNEP post-2015. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/eradicating-poverty-through-inclusive-green-economy-unep-post-2015-note-6
  41. UNIDO EIFA, ADA IIASA (2017) Sustainable energy for the implementation of the SDGs and the Paris Agreement. Vienna International Centre, ViennaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Insitute of Environmental Science and TechnologyAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.su-re.co (Sustainability and Resilience.co)BaliIndonesia
  3. 3.Stockholm Environment InstituteOxfordUK
  4. 4.Udayana UniversityBaliIndonesia
  5. 5.Development AlternativesNew DelhiIndia
  6. 6.African Climate and Development Initiative and the Department of Environmental and Geographical ScienceUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  7. 7.University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations