Micro-solutions to global problems: understanding social processes to eradicate energy poverty and build climate-resilient livelihoods
This research explores the agent dynamics, learning processes, and enabling conditions for the implementation of microscale win-win solutions that contribute to energy poverty eradication and climate resilience in a selection of low-income rural and peri-urban communities in India, Indonesia, and South Africa. We define these micro-solutions as energy-related interventions and resilience services or products—used at community, household, small production unit, or business level—that yield both economic and climatic gains. Our analysis identifies five elements critical for the robust design of these interventions: (i) The ability to collaborate and share different kinds of expertise with a range of networks operating at multiple levels of activity; (ii) The application of place-based systems-learning perspectives that enable project participants to integrate different types of solutions to meet different needs at the same time; (iii) The ability to yield tangible short-term benefits as part of long-term strategic visions and commitment; (iv) The use of novel technologies and financial instruments in ways that foreground the needs of poor populations; and (v) The inclusion and empowerment of economically marginalised groups through institutional and technological innovations and responsible business models. We conclude that the most critical aspect of successful micro win-win solutions is support for communities’ own endogenous transformative capacities as this helps ensure that solutions are shared and continuously adapted to changing conditions over time.
We would like to thank all participants to the workshops held in India, Indonesia and South Africa. This paper benefited from the thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
This research is part of the EU-funded H2020 project GREEN-WIN—Green Growth and Win-Win Strategies for Sustainable Climate Action (Grant Agreement No 642018; www.green-win-project.eu).
- GNESD (2013) Energy poverty in development countries’ urban poor communities. Assessments and recommendations. Country report 2013. Case Study South Africa. UCT South Africa & Riso Centre, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- Granoff I, Eis J, MacFarland W, Hoy C, Watson C, de Battista G et al (2015) Zero poverty, zero emissions: eradicating extreme poverty in the climate crisis. ODI, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gupta AK (2016) Grassroots innovation: minds on the margin are not marginal minds. Random House India, GurgaonGoogle Scholar
- Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, Fay M, Kane T, Narloch U et al (2016) Shock waves: managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- IEA (International Energy Agency) (2017) WEO-2017 special report: energy access outlook. https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2017-special-report-energy-access-outlook
- IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jaeger CC, Hasselmann K, Leipold G, Mangalagiu D, Tàbara JD (2012) Reframing the problem of climate change: from zero sum game to win-win solutions. Earthscan. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lade SJ, Haider LJ, Engström G, Schlüter M (2017) Resilience offers escape from trapped thinking on poverty alleviation. Sci Adv 3(e1603043):1–11Google Scholar
- Olsson L, Opondo M, Tschakert P et al. (2014) Livelihoods and poverty. In: IPCC, climate change 2014: impacts adaptation and vulnerability. CUP, Cambridge, pp 793–832Google Scholar
- Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups 2ed. Mass. Harvard UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Pieterse E (2008) City futures: confronting the crisis of urban development. UCT press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
- Shackleton S, Ziervogel G, Sallu S, Gill T, Tschakert P (2015) Why is socially-just climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa so challenging? A review of barriers identified from empirical cases. Climate Change 6:321–344Google Scholar
- Tosun J, Schoenefeld JJ (2017) Collective climate action and networked climate governance Climate Change 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.440
- UN (United Nations) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
- UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, a synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf
- UNEP (2015a). Human development report 2015. UNEP. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Human+development+report+2015
- UNEP (2015b) Eradicating poverty through an inclusive green economy: UNEP post-2015. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/eradicating-poverty-through-inclusive-green-economy-unep-post-2015-note-6
- UNIDO EIFA, ADA IIASA (2017) Sustainable energy for the implementation of the SDGs and the Paris Agreement. Vienna International Centre, ViennaGoogle Scholar