Advertisement

Effects of climate change on sugarcane production in the state of Paraíba (Brazil): a panel data approach (1990–2015)

  • Wallysson Klebson de Medeiros Silva
  • Graziela Pinto de Freitas
  • Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior
  • Pablo Aurélio Lacerda de Almeida Pinto
  • Raphael AbrahãoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Climate change is one of the most relevant challenges faced by contemporary societies. The effects of climate variability emphasize the agricultural vulnerability of a location, especially through the dependence of agriculture on climatic factors. This work analyzed the impacts of climatic elements on sugarcane production for municipalities of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, from 1990 to 2015. We investigated how the behavior of climatic elements influenced each mesoregion. Through the production function, a regression with panel data was estimated using the pooled, fixed, and random effects models. To verify which model was most appropriate, the Chow, Hausman, Breusch-Pagan, and Wooldridge tests were performed. According to the tests, the most suitable model was the pooled model. The results showed the impacts of climatic parameters on sugarcane production in the municipalities of Paraíba state, Brazil. Rainfall was positively correlated with production, whereas the temperature negatively influenced production. A heterogeneous response of the impacts on the mesoregions was noted, with the municipalities belonging to the mesoregion of Mata Paraibana having a higher probability of producing sugarcane than other mesoregions.

Keywords

Agriculture Northeast Brazil Panel data Climate data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Projects 305419/2015-3 and 401687/2016-3) for their support.

References

  1. Alves LM, Marengo J (2010) Assessment of regional seasonal predictability using the PRECIS regional climate modeling system over South America. Theor Appl Climatol 100:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias D, Caballero J (2015) Paraiba State, Brazil: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Auffhammer M, Hsiang SM, Schlenker W, Sobel A (2013) Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BB (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron A, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr MKV, Knox JW (2011) The water relations and irrigation requirements of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum): a review. Exp Agric 47:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CRU (2018) University of east anglia climatic research unit. Climatic research unit, University of East Anglia. Data. UEA, Norwich. http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk. Accessed Aug 2018
  8. Cunha DA, Coelho AB, Féres JG (2015) Irrigation as an adaptive strategy to climate change: an economic perspective on Brazilian agriculture. Environ Dev Econ 20:57–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deschênes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97:354–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fageria NK, Morais OP, Santos AB (2010) Nitrogen use efficiency in upland rice genotypes. J Plant Nutr 33:1696–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2015) Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. Climate change and food systems: global assessments and implications for food security and trade. Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Francisco PRM, Santos D, Lima ERV, Moraes JMN, Trindade HCM (2017) Mapping of pedological potencial of soils for cultivation of ssugar cane in Paraíba state using geotechnolgies. J Hyperspectr Remote Sens 7:306–314Google Scholar
  13. Frisch R (1993) Editor’S note. Econometrica 1:1–4Google Scholar
  14. Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E, Clark R, Camp J, Willett K, Wiltshire A (2010) Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2973–2989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis. Person, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Gujarati D, Porter DC (2008) Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill RC, Griffiths WE, Judge GG (1997) Undergraduate econometrics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsiao C (2014) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IBGE (2016a) Brazilian institute of geography and statistics. Directorate of research, coordination of work and income, National Survey by household sample continuous. Synthesis of Paraíba (Síntese Paraíba). www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=pb. Accessed Aug 2018
  21. IBGE (2016b) Brazilian institute of geography and statistics. Municipal agricultural production (Produção Agrícola Municipal 2015). IBGE, Rio de Janeiro www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/temas.php?sigla=pb&tema=lavouratemporaria2015. Accessed Aug. 2018Google Scholar
  22. IPCC (2014) In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus WD, Shaw D (1994) The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. Am Econ Rev 84:753–771Google Scholar
  24. Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 16:239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkes M, Yao WW, Ma XY, Li J (2010) Simulation of point source wetting pattern of subsurface drip irrigation. Irrig Sci 29:331–339Google Scholar
  26. Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1998) Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinto HS, Assad ED (2008) Global warming and the new geography of the Brazilian agriculture production. Embrapa, São Paulo http://mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/CLIMA_E_AGRICULTURA_BRASIL_300908_FINAL.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018Google Scholar
  28. Sant’anna AC, Shanoyanb A, Bergtoldc JS, Caldas MM, Granco G (2016) Ethanol and sugarcane expansion in Brazil: what is fueling the ethanol industry? Int Food Agribus Man 19:163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silva VPR, Sousa FSS, Cavalcanti EP, Souza EP, Silva BB (2006) Teleconnections between sea-surface temperature anomalies and air temperature in Northeast Brazil. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 68:781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Srivastava AK, Rai MK (2012) Sugarcane production: impact of climate change and its mitigation. Biodiversitas 13:214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tintner G (1968) Methodology of mathematical economics and econometrics. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. UNICA (2015) Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association. Crop production (Produção por safra). http://www.unicadata.com.br/historico-de-producao-e-moagem.php?idMn=32&tipoHistorico=4. Accessed Aug. 2018
  33. Verbeek M (2000) A guide to modern econometrics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  34. Wonnacott TH, Wonnacott RJ (1990) Introductory statistics for business and economics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Wooldridge JM (2013) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western, Thomson, MasonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wallysson Klebson de Medeiros Silva
    • 1
  • Graziela Pinto de Freitas
    • 1
  • Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior
    • 1
  • Pablo Aurélio Lacerda de Almeida Pinto
    • 2
  • Raphael Abrahão
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center of Alternative and Renewable EnergyFederal University of Paraíba (UFPB)João PessoaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of Pernambuco (UPE)SalgueiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations