Climatic Change

, Volume 153, Issue 1–2, pp 303–304 | Cite as

Correction to: The usability of climate information in sub-national planning in India, Kenya and Uganda: the role of social learning and intermediary organisations

  • Susannah FisherEmail author
  • David Dodman
  • Marissa Van Epp
  • Ben Garside

Correction to: Climatic Change (2018) 151:219–245

The article was published without the Reference section. Please find the appropriate references here:



  1. Allen A et al (2015) The co-production of water justice in Latin American cities. In: Allen A et al (eds) Just urban futures: environmental justice and resilience in the urban global south. Palgrave McMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler J et al (2015) Priming adaptation pathways through adaptive co-management: design and evaluation for developing countries. Climate Risk Manage 12:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cliffe N et al (2016) Developing the capacity of farmers to understand and apply seasonal climate forecasts through collaborative learning processes. J Agric Educ Ext.
  4. Collins K, Ison R (2009) Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Env Pol Gov 19:358–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cundill G (2010) Monitoring social learning processes in adaptive comanagement: three case studies from South Africa. Ecol Soc 15(3):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cundill G, Rodela R (2012) A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. J Environ Manag 113:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dilling L, Lemos M (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environ Change 21.2(2011):680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ensor J, Harvey B (2015) Social learning and climate change adaptation: evidence for international development practice. WIRES Clim Change 6(5):509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher S et al (2015) Evaluating climate change adaptation: learning from methods in international development. N Dir Eval 147:p13–p35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flagg J, Kirchhoff C (2018) Context matters: context-related drivers of and barriers to climate information use. Clim Risk Manag 20:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golding N et al (2017) Improving user engagement and uptake of climate services in China. Clim Serv 5:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham A, Mitchell C (2016) The role of boundary organizations in climate change adaptation from the perspective of municipal practitioners. Clim Chang 139:381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey B, Ensor J, Garside B, Woodend J, Naess LO, Carlile L (2013) Social learning in practice: a review of lessons, impacts and tools for climate change. CCAFS Working Paper no. 38. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  14. ISET (2010) The shared learning dialogue: building stakeholder capacity and engagement for resilience action. Climate Resilience in Concept and Practice Working Paper Series. Boulder, Colorado. Last accessed 12.12.2017
  15. Jones L et al (2016) The changing role of NGOs in supporting climate services. ODI/BRACED Briefing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones L et al (2017) Constraining and enabling factors to using long-term climate information in decision-making. Clim Pol 17(5):p551–p572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirchhoff C, Esselman R, Brown D (2015) Boundary organizations to boundary chains: prospects for advancing climate science application. Clim Risk Manag 9:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lebel L, Grothmann T, Siebenhüner B (2010) The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management. Int Environ Agreements 10:333–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemos M et al (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang, OctoberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lourenco T et al (2016) The rise of demand-driven climate services. Nat Clim Chang 6:13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meadow AM et al (2015) Moving toward the deliberate coproduction of climate science knowledge. Weather Clim Soc 7(2):179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitlin D (2008) With and beyond the state – co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environ Urban 20(2):339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Plummer R (2013) Can adaptive co-management help to address the challenges of climate change adaptation? Ecol Soc 18(4):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rai N, Fisher S (2016) The political economy of low carbon resilient development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Ranger N, Garbett-Shiels S-L (2012) Accounting for a changing and uncertain climate. In: Planning and policymaking today: lessons for developing countries. Clim Dev 4(4):288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer LC (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4):r1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reeder T, Ranger N (2011) How do you adapt in an uncertain world? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 project. In: World Resources Report Uncertainty Series. World Resources Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodela R (2011) Social learning and natural resource management: the emergence of three research perspectives. Ecol Soc 16:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh C et al (2016) Developing a holistic approach to the analysis of farmer decision-making: implications for adaptation policy and practice in developing countries. Land Use Policy 59:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh C et al (2017) The utility of weather and climate information for adaptation decision-making: current uses and future prospects in Africa and India. Clim Dev.
  31. Van Epp M, Garside B (2014) Monitoring and evaluating social learning: a framework for cross-initiative application. CCAFS Working Paper no. 98. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Epp M, Garside B (2019) Towards an evidence base on the value of social learning-oriented approaches in the context of climate change and food security. Environ Policy Gov.
  33. Vaughan C, Dessai S (2014) Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White C et al (2017) Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions. Meteorol Appl.
  35. Wilby R, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wise et al (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Chang 28:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ziervogel G et al (2010) Using climate information for supporting climate change adaptation in water resource management in South Africa. Clim Chang 103:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations