Advertisement

Propagation of future climate conditions into hydrologic response from coastal southern California watersheds

  • Dongmei FengEmail author
  • Edward Beighley
  • Roozbeh Raoufi
  • John Melack
  • Yuanhao Zhao
  • Sam Iacobellis
  • Daniel Cayan
Article

Abstract

As a biodiverse region under a Mediterranean climate with a mix of highly developed and natural watersheds, coastal Santa Barbara County (SB), located in southern California, is susceptible to the hydrologic impacts of climate change. This study investigates the potential changes in hydro-meteorological variables in this region as well as their societal and ecological implications for projected climate conditions during the twenty-first century. Daily streamflow ensembles from 135 coastal watersheds for the period 2021–2100 are developed using the Hillslope River Routing (HRR) model forced with downscaled precipitation and temperature projections derived from 10 climate models in the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project, Phase 5, and two emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP, 4.5 and 8.5). Analysis of the projected ensemble precipitation and streamflow series relative to historical conditions (1961–2000) shows (i) minimal change in annual precipitation (median change within ±3%); (ii) an altered seasonal rainfall distribution with a decrease in rainfall at the beginning of the rainy season (Oct–Dec), an increase during the Jan–Mar period, and a decrease at the end of the season (Apr–Jun); (iii) increases in the magnitude and frequency of large storms (> 36 mm/day) which combined with a shorter rainy season, lead to increases in annual peak flows; and (iv) the propagation of the altered precipitation characteristics resulting in nonlinear changes in the magnitude and variability of annual maximum discharges (i.e., mean, standard deviation, skew) impacting estimated return period discharges (e.g., estimated 100-year flood discharges for the period 2061–2100 under 8.5 increase by up to 185%). While these results are specific to southern coastal California, the nature of nonlinear hydrologic response to altered precipitation characteristics underscores the value of regional studies investigating potential impacts of climate projections on streamflow dynamics.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. David Pierce for the climate model downscaling datasets, support for which was provided by the California Energy Commission (CEC-500-10-041) and the US Geological Survey through the Southwest Climate Science Center and from NOAA through the California Nevada Climate Applications Project (CNAP) Regional Integrated Science Applications (RISA) program.

Author contribution

D.F., E.B., J.M. and D.C. designed the framework of this study. D.F. and E.B. wrote the paper with support from J.M. R.R. developed PET data, Y.Z. contributed to the HRR model setup, S.I. performed the precipitation and temperature downscaling. D.F. performed the model calibration, future simulations, and results analyses.

Funding information

This research was supported by the Santa Barbara Area Coastal Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment (SBA CEVA) with funding from the NOAA Climate Program Office Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications (COCA) and Sea Grant Community Climate Adaptation Initiative (CCAI), NASA’s Terrestrial Hydrology (NNX12AQ36G, NNX14AD82G) and SWOT (NNX16AQ39G) Programs, and the National Science Foundation’s Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program (Santa Barbara Coastal LTER—OCE9982105, OCE-0620276, and OCE-123277).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2371_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 4921 kb)

References

  1. Aguilera R, Melack JM (2018) Relationships among nutrient and sediment fluxes, hydrological variability, fire and land cover in coastal California catchments. Biogeosciences, Journal of Geophysical ResearchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438(7066):303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Das T, Bala G, Wood AW, Nozawa T, Mirin AA (2008) Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319(5866):1080–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beighley R, Moglen G (2002) Trend assessment in rainfall-runoff behavior in urbanizing watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 7(1):27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:1(27) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beighley RE, Moglen GE (2003) Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanizing watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal. Water Resour Res 39(4):1093.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beighley RE, Melack JM, Dunne T (2003) Impacts of California’s climatic regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 39(6):1419–1433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04428.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beighley RE, Dunne T, Melack JM (2005) Understanding and modeling basin hydrology: interpreting the hydrogeological signature. Hydrol Process 19(7):1333–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beighley RE, Dunne T, Melack JM (2008) Impacts of climate variability and land use alterations on frequency distributions of terrestrial runoff loading to coastal waters in Southern California. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44(1):62–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00138.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beighley RE, Eggert KG, Dunne T, He Y, Gummadi V, Verdin KL (2009) Simulating hydrologic and hydraulic processes throughout the Amazon River Basin. Hydrol Process 23(8):1221–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bende-Michl U, Verburg K, Cresswell HP (2013) High-frequency nutrient monitoring to infer seasonal patterns in catchment source availability, mobilisation and delivery. Environ Monit Assess 185(11):9191–9219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonfils C, Santer BD, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bala G, Das T, Barnett TP, Cayan DR, Doutriaux C, Wood AW (2008) Detection and attribution of temperature changes in the mountainous western United States. J Clim 21(23):6404–6424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown C (2010) The end of reliability. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(2):143–145.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brzezinski MA, Reed DC, Harrer S, Rassweiler A, Melack JM, Goodridge BM, Dugan JE (2013) Multiple sources and forms of nitrogen sustain year-round kelp growth: on the Inner Continental Shelf of the Santa Barbara Channel. Oceanography 26(3):114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burke WD, Ficklin DL (2017) Future projections of streamflow magnitude and timing differ across coastal watersheds of the western United States. Int J Climatol 37(13):4493–4508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byrnes JE, Reed DC, Cardinale BJ, Cavanaugh KC, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (2011) Climate-driven increases in storm frequency simplify kelp forest food webs. Glob Chang Biol 17(8):2513–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02409.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cayan D, Tyree M, Kunkel KE, Castro C, Gershunov A, Barsugli J, Ray AJ, Overpeck J, Anderson M, Russell J et al (2013) Future climate: Projected average. In: Garfin G, Jardine A, Merideth R, Black M, LeRoy S (eds) In assessment of climate change in the southwest United States: A report prepared for the national climate assessment. A report by the Southwest Climate Alliance, Washington, DC, pp 101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das T, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Hidalgo HG (2011a) Potential increase in floods in California’s Sierra Nevada under future climate projections. Clim Chang 109:71–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0298-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das T, Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Vano JA, Lettenmaier DP (2011b) The importance of warm season warming to western U.S. streamflow changes. Geophys Res Lett 38(23):L23403.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisner S, Flörke M, Chamorro A, Daggupati P, Donnelly C, Huang J, Hundecha Y, Koch H, Kalugin A, Krylenko I, Mishra V (2017) An ensemble analysis of climate change impacts on streamflow seasonality across 11 large river basins. Clim Chang 141(3):401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feng D, Beighley E, Hughes R, Kimbro D (2016) Spatial and temporal variations in eastern U.S. hydrology: responses to global climate variability. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 52(5):1089–1108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gelfan A, Gustafsson D, Motovilov Y, Arheimer B, Kalugin A, Krylenko I, Lavrenov A (2017) Climate change impact on the water regime of two great Arctic rivers: modeling and uncertainty issues. Clim Chang 141(3):499–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodridge BM, Melack JM (2012) Land use control of stream nitrate concentrations in mountainous coastal California watersheds. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 117(G2):G02005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hidalgo HG, Das T, Dettinger M, Cayan D, Pierce D, Barnett T, Bala G, Mirin A, Wood A, Bonfils C (2009) Detection and attribution of streamflow timing changes to climate change in the western United States. J Clim 22(13):3838–3855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoerling MP, Dettinger M, Wolter K, Lukas J, Eischeid J, Nemani R, Liebmann B and Kunkel KE (2013). “Present weather and climate: Evolving conditions.” In assessment of climate change in the southwest united states: A report prepared for the national climate assessment. A report by the Southwest Climate Alliance. G. Garfin, A. Jardine, R. Merideth, M. Black and S. LeRoy. Washington, DC: 74–100Google Scholar
  25. Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 national land cover database for the conterminous United States-representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81(5):345–354Google Scholar
  26. Homyak PM, Sickman JO, Miller AE, Melack JM, Meixner T, Schimel JP (2014) Assessing nitrogen-saturation in a seasonally dry chaparral watershed: limitations of traditional indicators of N-saturation. Ecosystems 17:1286–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hossain F, Arnold J, Beighley E, Brown C, Burian S, Chen J, Mitra A, Niyogi D, Pielke R Sr, Tidwell V et al (2015) What do experienced water managers think of water resources of our nation and its management infrastructure? PLoS One 10(11):e0142073.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson T, Butcher J, Deb D, Faizullabhoy M, Hummel P, Kittle J, McGinnis S, Mearns LO, Nover D, Parker A et al (2015) Modeling streamflow and water quality sensitivity to climate change and urban development in 20 U.S. watersheds. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 51(5):1321–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenneth S, Gary Y, James N, Brent B (2010) Characterizing changes in drought risk for the United States from climate change. Environ Res Lett 5(4):044012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kunkel KE, Stevens LE, Stevens SE, Sun L, Janssen E, Wuebbles D, Redmond KT and Dobson JG (2013). Regional climate trends and scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment: part 5. Climate of the Southwest U.S. NOAA Technical Report. Washington, D.C., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 87Google Scholar
  31. Lewis DB, Grimm NB (2007) Hierarchical regulation of nitrogen export from urban catchments: interactions of storms and landscapes. Ecol Appl 17(8):2347–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livneh B, Rosenberg EA, Lin C, Nijssen B, Mishra V, Andreadis KM, Maurer EP, Lettenmaier DP (2013) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: update and extensions. J Clim 26:9384–9392.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00508.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Livneh B, Bohn TJ, Pierce DW, Munoz-Arriola F, Nijssen B, Vose R, Cayan DR, Brekke L (2015) A spatially comprehensive, hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the U.S., and Southern Canada 1950–2013. ScieData 2:150042.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.42 Google Scholar
  34. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573–574.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mishra V and Lettenmaier DP (2011). Climatic trends in major US urban areas, 1950–2009. Geophys Res Lett 38(16)Google Scholar
  36. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mote PW, Li S, Lettenmaier DP, Xiao M, Engel R (2018) Dramatic declines in snowpack in the western US npj. Clim Atmos Sci 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s4292-018-0012-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Myers MR, Cayan DR, Iacobellis SF, Melack JM, Beighley RE, Barnard PL, Dugan JE and Page HM (2017). Santa Barbara area coastal ecosystem vulnerability assessmentGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Neill JAI (2010) Climate change’s impact on the design of water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure. Hydrol Days 2010:79–88Google Scholar
  40. Olsson J, Berggren K, Olofsson M, Viklander M (2009) Applying climate model precipitation scenarios for urban hydrological assessment: a case study in Kalmar City, Sweden. Atmos Res 92(3):364–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orlowsky B, Seneviratne SI (2012) Global changes in extreme events: regional and seasonal dimension. Clim Chang 110(3):669–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Hidalgo HG, Das T, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Bala G, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Mirin A et al (2008) Attribution of declining Western U.S. snowpack to human effects. J Clim 21(23):6425–6444.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2405.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Thrasher BL (2014) Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). J Hydrometeorol 15(6):2558–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC (2015) Improved bias correction techniques for hydrological simulations of climate change. J Hydrometeorol 16(6):2421–2442.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-14-0236.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pierce DW, Kalansky JF and Cayan DR (2018). Climate, drought, and sea level rise scenarios for the fourth California climate assessment. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, California Energy Commission. Publication number: CNRA-CEC-2018-006Google Scholar
  46. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100(2):81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raoufi R, Beighley E (2017) Estimating daily global evapotranspiration using penman–monteith equation and remotely sensed land surface temperature. Remote Sens 9(11):1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ray RL, Beighley RE, Yoon Y (2016) Integrating runoff generation and flow routing in Susquehanna River basin to characterize key hydrologic processes contributing to maximum annual flood events. J Hydrol Eng 21(9):04016026.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenberg EA, Keys PW, Booth DB, Hartley D, Burkey J, Steinemann AC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Precipitation extremes and the impacts of climate change on stormwater infrastructure in Washington state. Clim Chang 102(1):319–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9847-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider C, Laizé CLR, Acreman MC, Flörke M (2013) How will climate change modify river flow regimes in Europe? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swain DL, Langenbrunner B, Neelin JD, Hall A (2018) Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California. Nat Clim Chang 8(5):427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tamaddun K, Kalra A, Ahmad S (2016) Identification of streamflow changes across the continental United States using variable record lengths. Hydrology 3(2):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 93:485–498.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thakali R, Kalra A, Ahmad S (2016) Understanding the effects of climate change on urban stormwater infrastructures in the Las Vegas valley. Hydrology 3(4):34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas C. Peterson, Richard R. Heim, Robert Hirsch, Dale P. Kaiser, Harold Brooks, Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Randall M. Dole, Jason P. Giovannettone, Kristen Guirguis, Thomas R. Karl, Richard W. Katz, Kenneth Kunkel, Dennis Lettenmaier, Gregory J. McCabe, Christopher J. Paciorek, Karen R. Ryberg, Siegfried Schubert, Viviane B. S. Silva, Brooke C. Stewart, Aldo V. Vecchia, Gabriele Villarini, Russell S. Vose, John Walsh, Michael Wehner, David Wolock, Klaus Wolter, Connie A. Woodhouse, Donald Wuebbles, (2013) Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Floods, and Droughts in the United States: State of Knowledge. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94(6):821–834Google Scholar
  56. Vano JA, Udall B, Cayan DR, Overpeck JT, Brekke LD, Das T, Hartmann HC, Hidalgo HG, Hoerling M, McCabe GJ et al (2014) Understanding uncertainties in future Colorado river streamflow. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(1):59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-12-00228.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vicky E, Waliser DE, Bin G, Lavers DA, Martin RF (2018) Global analysis of climate change projection effects on atmospheric rivers. Geophys Res Lett 45(9):4299–4308.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GL076968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warner MD, Mass CF, Salathé EPS Jr (2015) Changes in winter atmospheric rivers along the north american west coast in CMIP5 climate models. J Hydrometeorol 16(1):118–128.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-14-0080.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Warrick JA, Melack JM, Goodridge BM (2015) Sediment yields from small, steep coastal watersheds of California. J Hydrol: Regional Studies 4:516–534Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine and Environmental ScienceNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Bren School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations