Climatic Change

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 35–46 | Cite as

Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes of beef cattle producers in the Southern Great Plains

  • Amber CampbellEmail author
  • Terrie A. Becerra
  • Gerad Middendorf
  • Peter Tomlinson


The beef cattle industry is both impacted by climate change and has opportunities to mitigate its impacts. A 2016 survey was conducted of beef cattle industry professionals in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Respondent beliefs were assessed using two questions. When asked, “is climate changing?” 57% provided affirmative responses. The majority also believed human activity was at least partially responsible (8% mostly human caused, 54% human and natural causes, 27% natural causes). Those attributing climate change to human action expressed the most concern, with respondents expressing decreasing levels of concern in proportion to their belief in human contribution. Regulations were less concerning for those who attributed climate change to human activities than all other causal groups. Attitudes toward both adaptation and mitigation were significantly associated with causal beliefs and concern level about general and specific climate change impacts and age. However, a majority of producers expressed support for adaptation efforts regardless of their causal beliefs. Attitudes toward mitigation were less favorable overall with those who believed human activities were the primary cause of climate change placing a higher priority on mitigation efforts than those who attributed climate change at least partially to natural causes and those who did not acknowledge the reality of climate change. Given generally favorable attitudes toward adaptation, focusing on adaptation messaging may be a way to engage those who would otherwise be disinclined to participate in climate change programming and still achieve increased resilience to projected climate change impacts.


Funding information

This survey was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, under award numbers 2012-02355 and 2013-69002-23146.


  1. Arbuckle JG, Morton LW, Hobbs J (2013) Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa. Clim Chang 118(3–4):551–563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajgain R, Xiao X, Doughty RB, Zhang Y, Basara JB, Wagle P, … Steiner JL (2017) Climate variability and productivity of grassland under different management systems. Presented at the American Geophysical Fall Meeting, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Feb 2018
  3. Basara JB, Flanagan PX, Christian J, Christian K (2016) Increased in variability in climatological means and extremes in the Great Plains. Poster presented at the AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from Accessed 4 Jan 2017
  4. Barnes AP, Toma L (2011) A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Clim Chang 112(2):507–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becerra T, Middendorf G, Campbell A, Tomlinson P (2016) Climate change challenges for extension educators: technical capacity and cultural attitudes. J Ext 54(6) Retrieved from
  6. Booker K, Huntsinger L, Bartolome JW, Sayre NF, Stewart W (2013) What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States? Glob Environ Chang 23(1):240–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briske DD, Joyce LA, Polley HW et al (2015) Climate-change adaptation on rangelands: linking regional exposure with diverse adaptive capacity. Front Ecol Environ 13:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell Hibbs A, Kahl DW, PytlikZillig L, Champion B, Abdel-Monem TL, Steffensmeier TR et al (2014) Agricultural producer perceptions of climate change and climate education needs for the Central Great Plains. J Ext 52(3):3FEA2Google Scholar
  9. Christian J, Christian K, Basara JB (2015) Drought and pluvial dipole events within the Great Plains of the United States. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 150612105243000.
  10. Combs S (2012) The impact of the 2011 drought and beyond. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Retrieved from Accessed 8 Jun 2018
  11. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 4th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  12. Fannin B (2012) Updated 2011 Texas agricultural drought losses total $7.62 billion. AgriLife Today. Retrieved from Accessed 8 Jun 2018
  13. Flanagan PX, Basara JB, Xiao X (2017) Long-term analysis of the asynchronicity between temperature and precipitation maxima in the United States Great Plains. Int J Climatol.
  14. Gramig BM, Barnard JM, Prokopy LS (2013) Farmer beliefs about climate change and carbon sequestration incentives. Clim Res 56(2):157–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haden VR, Niles MT, Lubell M, Perlman J, Jackson LE (2012) Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS One 7(12):e52882. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hahn GL (1997) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77(suppl_2):10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyland JJ, Jones DL, Parkhill KA, Barnes AP, Williams AP (2016) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agric Hum Values 33(2):323–339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyce LA, Briske DD, Brown JR, Polley HW, McCarl BA, Bailey DW (2013) Climate change and North American Rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies. Rangel Ecol Manag 66(5), 512–528.
  19. Liebig MA, Gross JR, Kronberg SL, Phillips RL, Hanson JD (2010) Grazing management contributions to net global warming potential: a long-term evaluation in the Northern Great Plains. J Environ Qual 39(3):799–809. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecol Appl 19(4), 1003–1021.
  21. Maibach EW, Leiserozitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK, Akerlof K (2011) Global Warming’s six Americas screening tools: survey instruments ; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. New Haven, Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from Accessed 3 Nov 2016
  22. Melillo J, Richmond T, Yohe GW (2014) 2014: climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment (p. 841). U.S. Global Change Research Program. Retrieved from Accessed 4 Nov 2016
  23. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2014) 2012 census of agriculture. Accessed 21 May 2018
  24. O’Brien K, Pelling MK, Patwardhan A, Hallegatte S, Maskrey A, Oki T et al (2012) Toward a sustainable and resilient future. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL et al (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (a special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 437–486Google Scholar
  25. Ojima DS, Steiner J, McNeely S et al (2015) Great Plains regional technical input report. Island Press, Washington, DC 193 pGoogle Scholar
  26. Oklahoma Water Resources Center (2011) Oklahoma agricultural losses from drought more than $1.6 billion. [Press release.] Retrieved from Accessed 8 Jun 2018
  27. Polley HW, Briske DD, Morgan JA et al (2013) Climate change and North American rangelands: trends, projections, and implications. Rangel Ecol Manag 66:493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rejesus RM (2012) Farmer perceptions and beliefs about climate change: a North Carolina perspective. NC State Economist. Retrieved from Accessed 2 Nov 2016
  29. Shafer M, Ojima D, Antle JM, Kluck D, McPherson RA, Petersen S, Scanlon B, Sherman K (2014) Chapter 19: Great Plains. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond T(TC), Yohe GW (eds) . U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 441–461.
  30. Shideler D, Doye D, Peel D, Sahs R (2012) The economic impact of the 2011 drought. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report CR-1046. Oklahoma State University, StillwaterGoogle Scholar
  31. Silanikove N (2000) Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livest Prod Sci 67:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanley PL, Rowntree JE, Beede DK, DeLonge MS, Hamm MW (2018) Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems. Agric Syst 162:249–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steiner JL, Briske DD, Brown DP, Rottler CM (2018) Vulnerability of Southern Plains agriculture to climate change. Clim Chang 146(1–2):201–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torell LA, Murugan S, Ramirez OA (2010) Economics of flexible versus conservative stocking strategies to manage climate variability and risk. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (2018) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2016 (Reports and Assessments No. EPA 430-R-18-003). Retrieved from Accessed 1 Jun 2018
  37. Zhang L, Wylie BK, Ji L, Gilmanov TG, Tieszen LL, Howard DM (2011) Upscaling carbon fluxes over the Great Plains grasslands: sinks and sources. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 116(G3).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and the EnvironmentKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Political Science, Legal Studies, and SociologyEast Central UniversityAdaUSA
  3. 3.Sociology, Anthropology, and Social WorkKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.AgronomyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations