Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states
Recent scholarship has thoroughly documented climate change attitudes within the majority of the English-speaking countries of the USA, the UK, Canada, and Australia. In these nations, political identity is widely recognized as a uniquely powerful predictor of climate change attitudes and, at least in the USA, several studies have found that education moderates the effect of political identity. The cross-national dynamics of climate change attitudes and political identity are not well-characterized, particularly in nations with a history of state socialism. In this manuscript, we consider the role of political and free market ideological polarization around climate change within Anglophone, Western European, and post-Communist states. Further, we investigate education as a moderator of political and ideological factors cross-nationally. We suggest that, in comparison to Western European and post-Communist states, the role of political and ideological polarization in Anglophone states is exceptional in shaping climate change attitudes. Using data for 20 countries in the 2010 ISSP Environmental Module, we find that the effect of party affiliation and free market ideology on the perception of climate change’s danger and importance is strongest in Anglophone states, more modest in Western European countries, and limited within post-Communist states. Further, education moderates most intensely in Anglophone states. Our results suggest that there is something exceptional occurring within Anglophone states with regard to political polarization and climate change attitudes.
This project was partly financially supported by the Leibniz Association (SAW-2017-PIK-4). We are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions of the editor and the anonymous reviewers.
- Carter N (2014) The politics of climate change in the UK. Clim Chang 5:423–433Google Scholar
- Gendall P (2012) International social survey programme study monitoring 2010 environment III. International Social Survey ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
- Greene S (2004) Social identity theory and party identification*. Soc Sci Q 85:136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hadler M, Wohlkönig P (2012) Environmental behaviours in the Czech Republic, Austria and Germany between 1993 and 2010: macro-level trends and individual-level determinants compared. Sociol Cas 48:467–492Google Scholar
- Hamilton C (2007) Scorcher: the dirty politics of climate change. Black Inc., Melbourne AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Hoggan J, Littlemore R (2009) Climate cover-up: the crusade to deny global warming. Greystone Books LtdGoogle Scholar
- ISSP Demographic Methods Group (2009) ISSP background variables guidelines. International Social Survey ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
- Kahan DM (2015) The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: what politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. Emerg Trends Soc Behav Sci Interdiscip Searchable Linkable Resour:1–16Google Scholar
- Lewis GB, Palm R, Feng B (2018) Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environ Polit 0:1–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1512261
- Selin H, VanDeveer SD (2012) Federalism, multilevel governance, and climate change policies across the Atlantic. In: Steinberg PF, VanDeveer SD (eds) Comparative environmental politics: theory, practice, and prospects. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 341–368Google Scholar
- Tvinnereim E (2015) A polarized climate? Party sorting over climate change and the environment among candidates and voters in Europe. Uni Research Rokkan Centre Working PaperGoogle Scholar
- Way L (2011) An energy superpower or a super sales pitch? Building the case through an examination of Canadian newspapers coverage of oil sands. Can Polit Sci Rev 5:74–98Google Scholar