Climatic Change

, Volume 151, Issue 3–4, pp 605–618 | Cite as

Cap-and-trade versus carbon taxes: which market mechanism gets the most attention?

  • Lea-Rachel KosnikEmail author


In the debate between carbon taxes and cap-and-trade as a policy response to curbing greenhouse gas emissions, which market-based policy tool tends to garner the most (favorable) media attention? Furthermore, what is the public coverage like of topics such as trade, energy prices, and economic growth and green jobs? Understanding the media’s response to market-based policy mechanisms is important for understanding their ultimate acceptance, or rejection, beyond the academic sphere. One interesting result from this research is that cap-and-trade wins hands down over carbon taxes—it received more, and more positive, media attention in the US in the 22-year time period under study.



  1. Aldy J, Stavins R (2012) Using the market to address climate change: insights from theory and experience. Daedalus 141(2):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlt D, Hoppe I, Wolling J (2011) Climate change and media usage: effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. Int Commun Gaz 73(1–2):45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellas A, Kosnik L (2018) Which leading journal leads? Idea diffusion in economic research journals. Empir Econ In PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Climate Change 114:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carl J, Fedor D (2016) Tracking global carbon revenues: a survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world. Energy Policy 96:50–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho A (2010) Media(ted) discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Clim Change 1:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeWall CN, Pond RS, Campbell WK, Twenge JM (2011) Tuning in to psychological change: linguistic markers of psychological traits and emotions over time in popular U.S. song lyrics. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 5(3):200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogarty B, Kimball D, Kosnik L (2018) The media, voter fraud, and the U.S. 2012 Elections. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  9. Gavin NT (2009) Addressing climate change: a media perspective. Environ Polit 18(5):765–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica 78(1):35–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Economist (2017) Get off my cloud: trying to stay above politics, economists risk being not just wrong, but irrelevant. De Economist 69Google Scholar
  12. Goulder LH, Schein AR (2013) Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Clim Change Econ 4(3):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ (2011) Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Clim Change Econ 2(3):257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosnik L (2018) JEL codes—what do they mean and are they used consistently? J Econ Surv 32(1):249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosnik L (2016) In tandem or out of sync? Academic economics research and public policy measures. Contemp Econ Policy 34(1):190–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosnik L (2015) What have economists been doing for the last 50 years? A text analysis of published academic research from 1960–2010. Economics 9:1–38Google Scholar
  17. Kosnik L (2014) Determinants of contract completeness: an environmental regulatory application. Int Rev Law Econ 37:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laver M, Benoit K, Garry J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee KCL, Newell JP, Wolch J, Schneider N, Joassart-Marcelli P (2014) ‘Story-networks’ of livestock and climate change: actors, their artifacts, and the shaping of urban print media. Soc Nat Resour 27:948–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCombs M (2005) A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journal Stud 6(4):543–557Google Scholar
  21. Michel JB, Shen YK, Presser Aiden A, Veres A, Gray MK, The Google Books Team, Pickett JP, Hoiberg D, Clancy D, Norvig P, Orwant J, Pinker S, Nowak MA, Lieberman Aiden E (2011) Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mrogers E, Wdearing J (2016) Agenda-setting research: where has it been, where is it going? Ann Int Commun Assoc 11(1):555–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olausson U (2009) Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Underst Sci 18:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peters HP (2008) Legitimizing climate policy: the ‘risk construct’ of global climate change in the German mass media. Int J Sustain Commun 3:14–36Google Scholar
  25. Sampei Y, Aoyagi-Usui M (2009) Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Glob Environ Chang 19:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schafer M, Schlichting I (2014) Media representations of climate change: a meta-analysis of the research field. Environ Commun 8(2):142–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephen T (2000) Concept analysis of gender, feminist, and women’s studies research in the communication literature. Commun Monogr 67(2):193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tetlock PC (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market. J Financ 62(3):1139–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations