Assessing climate change impacts on California hydropower generation and ancillary services provision
- 2.3k Downloads
Climate change is expected to significantly reshape hydropower generation in California. However, the impact on the ability of hydropower to provide reserve capacity that can provide on-demand, back-up electricity generation to stabilize the grid in the case of a contingency has not been explored. This study examined the impact of climate change-driven hydrologic shifts on hydropower contributions to generation and ancillary services. We used projections from four climate models under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 to evaluate the impact of climate change conditions, comparing the future period 2046–2055 to the baseline 2000–2009, and observed a net increase of inflow into large hydropower units in northern California. However, as extreme events yield greater spillage, increased overall inflow did not necessarily yield increased generation. Additionally, higher winter generation and summer reservoir constraints resulted in decreases in the spinning reserve potential for both RCP scenarios. We also examined a regionally downscaled “long drought” scenario under RCP8.5 to assess the impact of an extended dry period on generation and spinning reserve bidding. The long drought scenario, developed as part of the California 4th Climate Assessment, involves rainfall congruent with 20-year historical dry spells in California under increased temperatures. In addition to decreased generation, the long drought scenario yielded a 41% reduction in spinning reserve bidding tied to a decline in reservoir levels. The decreased spinning reserve bidding from hydropower may require increased reliance on other electricity resources that can provide the same dynamic support to maintain grid stability under climate change.
We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed in Table S4) for producing and making their model output available. For CMIP, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provided coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
The California Map used in this article was created using ArcGIS® software by Esri. ArcGIS® and ArcMap™ is the intellectual property of Esri and is used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri® software, please visit www.esri.com.
The authors acknowledge the California Energy Commission for providing funding for this work under the Long-Term Climate Scenarios project, Agreement #: EPC-14-074.
- Brekke, Levi, Andy Wood, and Tom Pruitt. 2014. “Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 hydrology projections release of hydrology projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs.” https://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/techmemo/BCSD5HydrologyMemo.pdf Google Scholar
- Climate Change Technical Advisory Group. 2015. “Perspectives and guidance for climate change analysis.” California Department of Water Resources. https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/climatechange/docs/2015/Perspectives_Guidance_Climate_Change_Analysis.pdf
- California Energy Commission. 2017. “California hydroelectric statistics & data.” http://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/renewables_data/hydro/ Google Scholar
- CAISO. 2006. “Spinning reserve and non-spinning reserve.” https://www.caiso.com/Documents/SpinningReserveandNonSpinningReserve.pdf#_blank Google Scholar
- CAISO. 2008. “Market issues and performance: 2007 annual report.” https://caiso.com/Documents/2007AnnualReportonMarketIssuesandPerformance.pdf Google Scholar
- CAISO. 2017. 2016 annual report on market issues and performance. http://www.caiso.com/Documents/2016AnnualReportonMarketIssuesandPerformance.pdf Google Scholar
- CAISO. (n.d.)“OASIS.” http://oasis.caiso.com/mrioasis/logon.do
- Electric Power Research Institute. 2013. “Quantifying the value of hydropower in the electric grid: final report.” https://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/epri_value_hydropower_electric_grid.pdf Google Scholar
- FERC. 2001. “Addressing the 2000–2001 western energy crisis.” https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/wec/enron/data-sets.asp Google Scholar
- Haddeland I, Skaugen T, Lettenmaier DP (2006) Anthropogenic impacts on continental surface water fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 33(8)Google Scholar
- IPCC 2013. Climate change 2013 - the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia.] ed. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Kravitz, Raquel. 2017. “Projected climate scenarios selected to represent a range of possible futures in California.” http://docketpublic.energy.ca.gov/PublicDocuments/16-IEPR-04/TN215798_20170207T111409_Projected_Climate_Scenarios_Selected_to_Represent_a_Range_of_Po.pdf Google Scholar
- Loose, Verne W. 2011. “Quantifying the value of hydropower in the electric grid: role of hydropower in existing markets.” Sandia LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
- Null, S.E., and J.H. Viers. 2012. “Water and energy sector vulnerability to climate warming in the Sierra Nevada: water year classification in non-stationary climates.” California Energy Commission (CEC-500-2012-015)Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. (n.d.) “New melones unit project.” https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=365
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014. “California drought leads to less hydropower, increased natural gas generation - today in energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=18271 Google Scholar
- US Geological Survey California Water Science Center. 2011. “Water data: annual data reports.” https://ca.water.usgs.gov/data/waterdata/schematics2007.html Google Scholar
- van Beek LPH, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP (2011) Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability. Water Resour Res 47(7)Google Scholar