Climatic Change

, Volume 150, Issue 3–4, pp 259–272 | Cite as

Climate change beliefs in an agricultural context: what is the role of values held by farming and non-farming groups?

  • Matthew R. SandersonEmail author
  • Jason S. Bergtold
  • Jessica L. Heier Stamm
  • Marcellus M. Caldas
  • Steven M. Ramsey
  • Joseph Aistrup


Climate change in many agricultural contexts will increase tensions between farming and non-farming populations over adaptations in land use and water conservation strategies. How adequately these future tensions may be mitigated will be partially determined by each groups' beliefs about climate change. A voluminous literature shows that climate change beliefs are crucial for understanding engagement with climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, and that values motivate climate change beliefs, but the role of values remains unclear, and comparisons of farming and non-farming populations are scant. We develop a model of climate change beliefs that integrates four main motivating factors - values, political ideology, knowledge, and worldview - and we explicitly compare members of farming and non-farming populations in an agricultural watershed in the Central Great Plains, USA. Our findings highlight the role of held values in motivating climate change beliefs and point to areas of potential consensus and tension within and among members of these two groups. The results provide an empirical basis for developing future climate change engagement strategies in contexts of growing divides and conflicts among farming and non-farming groups.

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2283_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 2294 kb)


  1. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL (2008) Is polarization really a myth? J Polit 70:542–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger, W.N., J. Barnett, F.S. Chapin III, H. Ellemor. 2011. This must be the place: underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making. Glob Environ Pol 11, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuckle MB (2017) The interaction of religion, political ideology, and concern about climate change in the United States. Soc Nat Resour 30(2):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbuckle JG et al (2013a) Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Clim Chang 117:943–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arbuckle JG et al (2013b) Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: evidence from Iowa. Clim Chang 118:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbuckle JG, Hobbs J, Loy A, Morton LW, Prokopy LS, Tyndall J (2014) Understanding Corn Belt farmer perspective climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation. J Soil Water Conserv 69(6):505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arbuckle JG, Tyndall JC, Morton LW, Hobbs J (2017) Climate change typologies and audience segmentation among Corn Belt farmers. J Soil Water Conserv 72(3):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollen K (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldas MM et al (2015) Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:8157–8159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collomb J-D (2014) The ideology of climate change denial in the United States. Eur J Am Stud, 9(1). Retrieved from
  12. Converse PE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter D (ed) Ideology and discontent. Free Press, New York, pp 206–261Google Scholar
  13. Corner A et al (2012) Uncertainty, skepticism, and attitudes toward climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Clim Chang 114:463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corner A et al (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. WIRES Clim Change 5:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson D (2016) Gaps in agricultural climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang 6:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dietz T (2015) Environmental values. In: Brosch T, Sander D (eds) Oxford Handbook of Values. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz T et al (2007) Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol 72:185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz T et al (2009) How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: an experiment. Land Econ 85:329–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1983) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Erikson RS, Tedin KL (2003) American public opinion, 6th edn. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldman S (2003) Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In: DO Sears L, Huddy RJ (eds) Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp 477–508Google Scholar
  22. Henry AD, Dietz T (2012) Understanding environmental cognition. Organ Environ 25:238–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hitlin S (2003) Values as the core of personal identity: drawing links between the two theories of self. Soc Psychol Q 66(2):118–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman AJ (2011) The growing climate divide. Nat Clim Chang 1:195–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyland JJ, Jones DL, Parkhill KA, Barnes AP, Willams AP (2016) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agric Hum Values 33:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2014. In: Pachauri, R.K. Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Jost JT, Federico CM, Napier JL (2009) Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu Rev Psychol 60:307–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahan DM et al (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14:147–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahan DM et al (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiem AS, Austin EK (2013) Drought and the future of rural communities: opportunities and challenges for climate change adaptation in regional Victoria, Australia. Glob Environ Chang 23:1307–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohut, Andrew, Carroll Doherty, Michael Dimock, and Scott Ketter, "Beyond Red vs. Blue: Political Typology." May 4, 2011, Pew Center for People and the Press, Washington, D.C.
  32. Layman GC, Carsey TM (2002) Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. Am J Polit Sci 46:786–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCright AM (2011) Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concerns about climate change. Clim Chang 104:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Marquart-Pyatt ST (2015) Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environ Polit 25(2):338–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCright AM et al (2016) Ideology, capitalism, and climate: explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci 21:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGuire JM, Morton LW, Cast AD (2012) Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agric Hum ValuesGoogle Scholar
  38. McGuire JM, Morton LW, Arbuckle JG, Cast AD (2015) Farmer identities and responses to the socio-biophysical environment. J Rural Stud 39:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melillo, J.M., et al., 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, 841 pp.
  40. Morton LW, McGuire JM, Cast AD (2017) A good farmer pays attention to the weather. Climate Risk Management 15:18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Myers TA et al (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. NRC (National Research Council) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  43. NRC (National Research Council) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. In: National Academies Press. D.C, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  44. NRC (National Research Council) (2010) Advancing the science of climate change: America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Yarnal B, Wiefek N (2002) Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Soc Sci Q 83:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Connor R et al (2012) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Clim Chang 114:479–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palm R, Lewis GB, Feng B (2017) What causes people to change their opinion about climate change? Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(4):883–896Google Scholar
  48. Pimentel D et al (1997) Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. BioScience 47:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pradhananga AK, Davenport MA, Fulton DC, Maruyama GM, Current D (2017) An integrated moral obligation model for landowner conservation norms. Soc Nat Resour 30(2):212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prokopy LS et al (2015) Farmers and climate change: a cross-national comparison of beliefs and risk perceptions in high-income countries. Environ Manag 56:492–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwartz SH, Boehnke K (2004) Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 38:230–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shcherbak I et al (2014) Global metaanalysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N2o) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:9199–9204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spence A et al (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32:957–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stern PC (2016) Impacts on climate change views. Nat Clim Chang 6:341–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stern PC, Dietz T (2015) IPCC: social scientists are ready. Nature 521:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stern PC et al (1995) Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25:1611–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stern PC et al (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–98Google Scholar
  59. Stern PC et al (2016) Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nat Clim Chang 6:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Moore SE, Carrier SJ (2014) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Chang 126:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stuart D, Schewe RL (2016) Constrained choice and climate change mitigation in US agriculture: structural barriers to a climate change ethic. J Agric Environ Ethics 29:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stuart D, Schewe RL, McDermott M (2012) Responding to climate change: barriers to reflexive modernization in US agriculture. Organ Environ 25(3):308–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tranter B, Booth K (2015) Skepticism in a changing climate: a cross-national study. Glob Environ Chang 33:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vedwan N (2006) Culture, climate and the environment: local knowledge and perception of climate change among apple growers in northwestern India. J Ecol Anthropol 10:4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ziegler A (2017) Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: an empirical cross country analysis. Energy Econ 63:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  5. 5.Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural BusinessNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  6. 6.Department of Political Science, College of Liberal Arts and SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations