Climate change beliefs in an agricultural context: what is the role of values held by farming and non-farming groups?
Climate change in many agricultural contexts will increase tensions between farming and non-farming populations over adaptations in land use and water conservation strategies. How adequately these future tensions may be mitigated will be partially determined by each groups' beliefs about climate change. A voluminous literature shows that climate change beliefs are crucial for understanding engagement with climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, and that values motivate climate change beliefs, but the role of values remains unclear, and comparisons of farming and non-farming populations are scant. We develop a model of climate change beliefs that integrates four main motivating factors - values, political ideology, knowledge, and worldview - and we explicitly compare members of farming and non-farming populations in an agricultural watershed in the Central Great Plains, USA. Our findings highlight the role of held values in motivating climate change beliefs and point to areas of potential consensus and tension within and among members of these two groups. The results provide an empirical basis for developing future climate change engagement strategies in contexts of growing divides and conflicts among farming and non-farming groups.
- Collomb J-D (2014) The ideology of climate change denial in the United States. Eur J Am Stud, 9(1). Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/ejas/10305
- Converse PE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter D (ed) Ideology and discontent. Free Press, New York, pp 206–261Google Scholar
- Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1983) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Erikson RS, Tedin KL (2003) American public opinion, 6th edn. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Feldman S (2003) Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In: DO Sears L, Huddy RJ (eds) Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp 477–508Google Scholar
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2014. In: Pachauri, R.K. Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Kohut, Andrew, Carroll Doherty, Michael Dimock, and Scott Ketter, "Beyond Red vs. Blue: Political Typology." May 4, 2011, Pew Center for People and the Press, Washington, D.C. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/legacy-pdf/Beyond-Red-vs-Blue-The-Political-Typology.pdf
- McGuire JM, Morton LW, Cast AD (2012) Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agric Hum ValuesGoogle Scholar
- Melillo, J.M., et al., 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, 841 pp. https://doi.org/10.7930/J0Z31WJ2.
- NRC (National Research Council) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
- NRC (National Research Council) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. In: National Academies Press. D.C, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- NRC (National Research Council) (2010) Advancing the science of climate change: America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
- Palm R, Lewis GB, Feng B (2017) What causes people to change their opinion about climate change? Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(4):883–896Google Scholar
- Stern PC et al (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–98Google Scholar