Climatic Change

, Volume 149, Issue 3–4, pp 349–365 | Cite as

Place, proximity, and perceived harm: extreme weather events and views about climate change

  • Chad ZanoccoEmail author
  • Hilary Boudet
  • Roberta Nilson
  • Hannah Satein
  • Hannah Whitley
  • June Flora


Advances in event attribution have improved scientific confidence in linking climate change to extreme weather severity and frequency, but this confidence varies by event type. Yet, scholars and activists argue that extreme weather events may provide the best opportunity to raise awareness and prompt action on climate change. We focus on four cases of extreme weather with low attribution (tornado outbreaks in Laurel County, Kentucky, and Winston County, Mississippi; wildfires in Yavapai County, Arizona, and Lake County, California). We survey county residents to examine the role of event proximity, community- and event-specific characteristics, and reported harm in shaping climate change views post-event. Using multilevel regression analysis, we find that reported personal and community harm aligns with event proximity and larger community damages. For our respondents’ climate change views, however, political ideology dominates, suggesting the importance of motivated reasoning in individual interpretations of extreme weather events. At the same time, while event proximity is irrelevant, we find reported harm to be related to climate change views. Thus, while respondents appear to be making connections between extreme weather events and climate change among our four cases, these connections seem to be most likely to occur in communities where belief in climate change is already high, the event caused significant impacts and is more attributable to climate change, and elites frame the event in these terms—as in Lake County. Our findings are particularly relevant for policymakers and activists looking to such events as catalysts for climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts.



We would like to acknowledge the many individuals from Laurel, Winston, Yavapai, and Lake Counties who graciously offered their time and perspectives for interviews and surveys. We would also like to thank our project collaborators for their invaluable assistance, including Doug McAdam, Jenna Knobloch, Ika Widiyasari, Noel Downing, Courtney Flathers, and Stephanie Shepard.

Funding information

This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation Sociology Program grant no. 1357055, Community Reactions to Extreme Weather Events.

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2251_MOESM1_ESM.docx (227 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 227 kb)


  1. Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D et al (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Chang 23:81–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:14065823Google Scholar
  3. Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS One 7:e50182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohr J (2017) Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public. Clim Chang 142:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borick CP, Rabe BG (2017) Personal experience, extreme weather events, and perceptions of climate change.
  6. Broomell SB, Budescu DV, Por H-H (2015) Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Glob Environ Chang 32:67–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Chang 114:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JS, Mase AS, Knutson CL et al (2016) The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Clim Chang 135:211–226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cody EM, Stephens JC, Bagrow JP et al (2017) Transitions in climate and energy discourse between Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. J Environ Stud Sci 7:87–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corner A, Whitmarsh L, Xenias D (2012) Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Chang 114:463–478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demski C, Capstick S, Pidgeon N et al (2017) Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Clim Chang 140:149–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deryugina T (2013) How do people update? The effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming. Clim Chang 118:397–416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Extreme weather and climate change in the American mind April 2013. In: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  15. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Lemcke-Stampone M et al (2015) Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS One 10:e0138208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton LC, Wake CP, Hartter J et al (2016) Flood realities, perceptions and the depth of divisions on climate. Sociology 50:913–933. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howe PD, Boudet H, Leiserowitz A, Maibach EW (2014) Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events. Clim Chang 127:381–389. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe PD, Mildenberger M, Marlon JR, Leiserowitz A (2015) Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nat Clim Chang 5:596–603. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konisky DM, Hughes L, Kaylor CH (2016) Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Clim Chang 134:533–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lake County (2017) Lake County, CA GIS Portal. Accessed 15 Aug 2017
  21. Lang C (2014) Do weather fluctuations cause people to seek information about climate change? Clim Chang 125:291–303. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lujala P, Lein H, Rød JK (2015) Climate change, natural hazards, and risk perception: the role of proximity and personal experience. Local Environ 20:489–509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magill B (2015) Climate firestorm leaves mass destruction in California. In: Scientific American. Accessed 25 Mar 2018
  24. Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: an audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One 6:e17571. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marquart-Pyatt ST, McCright AM, Dietz T, Dunlap RE (2014) Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Glob Environ Chang 29:246–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McAdam D (2017) Social movement theory and the prospects for climate change activism in the United States. Ann Rev Polit Sci 20:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Marquart-Pyatt ST (2016) Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environ Polit 25:338–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald RI, Chai HY, Newell BR (2015) Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: an integrative review. J Environ Psychol 44:109–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C et al (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:343–347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Academies of Sciences E (2016) Attribution of extreme weather events in the context of climate changeGoogle Scholar
  31. NOAA (2017) NOAA’s National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center. Accessed 15 Aug 2017
  32. Ogunbode CA, Liu Y, Tausch N (2017) The moderating role of political affiliation in the link between flooding experience and preparedness to reduce energy use. Clim Chang:1–14.
  33. Ray A, Hughes L, Konisky DM, Kaylor C (2017) Extreme weather exposure and support for climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 46:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Renn O (2011) The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change: social amplification/attenuation of risk framework. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2:154–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reser JP, Bradley GL, Ellul MC (2014) Encountering climate change: ‘seeing’ is more than ‘believing. WIREs Clim Change 5:521–537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosseel Y (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. J Stat Softw 48:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shepard S, Boudet H, Zanocco CM et al (2018) Community climate change beliefs, awareness, and actions in the wake of the September 2013 flooding in Boulder County, Colorado. J Environ Stud Sci:1–14.
  38. Sisco MR, Bosetti V, Weber EU (2017) When do extreme weather events generate attention to climate change? Clim Chang 143:227–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32:957–972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117:440–463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. U.S. Census Bureau (2017) 2011–2015 American community survey 5-year estimatesGoogle Scholar
  42. U.S. Geological Survey (2014) 1997–2014 Edition of the National Atlas of the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  43. van der Linden S (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J Environ Psychol 41:112–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaske J (2008) Survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, Inc., State CollegeGoogle Scholar
  45. Winston County Journal (2014) Gov. Bryant holds press conferences on storms that hit county. Accessed 15 Aug 2017
  46. Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office (2013) The destruction of Yarnell hill fire. Accessed 15 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Water Resources Graduate ProgramOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and EducationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  5. 5.Solutions Science Lab, Division of General PediatricsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations