Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Planning for climigration: a framework for effective action

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenon of ‘climigration’ is an emerging and increasing challenge to human settlements. Climigration refers to community relocation undertaken in response to climate change impacts. This paper adds to early but critical scholarly discussions by providing a land-use planning framework for organising and responding to the governance, policy, institutional and cultural implications of climigration. This paper argues that land-use planning will be increasingly required to manage climigration events over the coming decades and will rely on input and guidance from other disciplines to do so effectively. Climigration is conceptualised as an end-point of climate change adaptation in this paper. Empirical content derives from a multidisciplinary systematic quantitative literature review of international case studies of community relocations. Planning factors with critical, moderate or negligible influences on relocation success are synthesised. These are linked to the roles and functions of land-use planning systems to provide a framework for approaching climigration. The paper provides three interlinked conclusions. The first is that spatial planning systems have potential and capacity to respond to climigration as an extreme form of climate change adaptation. The second is that anticipatory policy frameworks offer the greatest advantages for successful climigration planning. The third conclusion is that maladaptation is a potential but avoidable threat connected to climigration planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel N, Gorddard R, Harman B, Leitch A, Langridge J, Ryan A, Heyenga S (2011) Sea level rise, coastal development and planned retreat: analytical framework, governance principles and an Australian case study. Environ Sci Policy 14(1):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Barnett J, Brown K, Marshall N, O’Brien K (2013) Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri S, Asgary A, Eftekhari A, Levy J (2006) Post-disaster resettlement, development and change: a case study of the 1990 Manjil earthquake in Iran. Disasters 30(4):451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronen R (2011) Climate-induced community relocations: creating an adaptive governance framework based in human rights doctrine. NYU Review of Law and Social Chang 35:356–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronen R, Chapin FS (2013) Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(23):9320–9325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong S (2011) Policy solutions in the U.S. Clim Chang 106:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola DP (2011) Introduction to international disaster management (2nd edition). Elsevier, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Daveport C, Robertson C (2016) Resettling the first American climate refugees. The New York Times. May 3, 2016

  • David E, Mayer J (1984) Comparing costs of alternative flood hazard mitigation plans: the case of Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin. J Am Plan Assoc 50(1):22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and APA (American Planning Association) (Eds.) (2005) Policies for guiding planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/pdf/rebuild/ltrc/fema_apa_ch3.pdf (accessed 20 Apr 2017)

  • Friedmann J (2008) The uses of planning theory: a bibliographic essay. J Plan Educ Res 28(2):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson B (2008) Waking from the dream: an Australian perspective on urban resilience. Urban Stud 45(13):2653–2668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitart D, Pickering C, Byrne J (2012) Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban For Urban Green 11(4):364–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH, Clark W, Keating T, Cash D, Moser S, Miller C, Powers C (2000) Report of the Workshop on Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science. 9–10 December 1999. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamin EM, Gurran N (2009) Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the U.S. and Australia. Habitat Int 33(3):238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. MacMillan Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2002) Handbook for preparing a resettlement action plan. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Imura M, Shaw R (2009) Challenges and potentials of post-disaster relocation. Asian J Environ Disaster Manag 1(2):199–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2011) International migration law: glossary on migration. IOM, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC

  • Klein J, Mantysalo R, Juhola S (2015) Legitimacy of urban climate change adaptation: a case in Helsinki. Reg Environ Chang 16(6):815–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckie S (ed) (2014a) Land solutions for climate displacement. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckie S (2014b) Conclusions: possible land solution tools to resolve climate displacement. In: Leckie S (ed) Land solutions for climate displacement. Routledge, New York, pp 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy JM (2017) Contemporary urban planning, 11th edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony M (2013) Boundary spaces: science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009. Geoforum 49:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado JK, Shearer C, Bronen R, Peterson K, Lazrus H (2013) The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the US: displacement, relocation, and human rights. Clim Chang 120:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino E (2012) The long history of environmental migration: assessing vulnerability construction and obstacles to successful relocation in Shishmaref, Alaska. Glob Environ Chang 22(2):374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews T (2011) Operationalising climate adaptation through institutional change: conceptual and empirical insights. Proceedings of World Planning Schools Congress, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews T (2013) Institutional perspectives on operationalising climate adaptation through planning. Plan Theory Pract 14(2):198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Goddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 14(3):251–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson B (2010) Ideology, environment and forced relocation: Kiruna—a town on the move. Eur Urban Reg Stud 17(4):433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven R, Bardsley D (2013) Planned retreat as a management response to coastal risk: a case study from the Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. Reg Environ Chang 13:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A (1991) Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. Disasters 15(1):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry R, Lindell M (1997) Principles for managing community relocation as a hazard mitigation measure. J Continuing Crisis Manag 5(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew M (2001) Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. Br Med J 322:98–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering C, Byrne J (2014) The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early career researchers. Higher Education Research Development Journal 33(3):534–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C (2012) A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Green 11:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht CD, Byrne JA (2014) Informal urban greenspace: a typology and trilingual systematic review of its role for urban residents and trends in the literature. Urban For Urban Green 13(4):597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley R, Utz S (2012) Making it count: a review of the value and techniques for public consultation. J Plan Lit 27(1):22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriver T, Kennedy D (2005) Contested environmental hazards and community conflict over relocation. Rural Sociol 70(4):491–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipe N, Vella K (2014) Relocating a flood-affected community: good planning or good politics? J Am Plan Assoc 80(4):400–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2012) Expert views of climate change adaptation in the Maldives. Clim Chang 114:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stal M (2011) Flooding and relocation: the Zambezi River Valley in Mozambique. Int Migr 49(1):125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthews, T., Potts, R. Planning for climigration: a framework for effective action. Climatic Change 148, 607–621 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2205-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2205-3

Navigation