Rangeland vulnerability to state transition under global climate change
The rapid pace of global climate change necessitates tools for prioritizing limited climate-adaptation resources in the face of imperfect knowledge regarding plant community responses to changing climate. In addition, global climate change often leads to novel shifts in plant communities which are difficult to anticipate with detailed models based on current system dynamics, which are often greatly altered under novel climates. In order to identify nonforested plant communities that are highly susceptible to state transitions under global climate change, we examined differences between the historical climate envelopes and end-of-century projections. We developed a vulnerability index based on the realized climate envelope for a given plant community relative to future climate exposure under two different climate-forcing models. To provide an approach to prioritizing climate-change adaptation resources at smaller scales, we used scenario analysis to determine the probability of falling outside of the historical climate envelope for each vegetation type present in a given management unit. The large-scale index consistently identified several areas as highly vulnerable to ecosystem state transition under future global climate change. South and north central Texas, the northwestern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain regions, eastern Kansas, and large portions of central and western Texas appear most vulnerable under both climate models. Scenarios identified thresholds of potential state shift for every vegetation type in the small-scale management areas investigated. Our study identifies a simple method for determining the relative vulnerability of nonforested plant communities to state shifts, providing a robust approach for prioritizing limited climate-adaptation resources at multiple scales.
KeywordsRangelands Scenario analysis Alternative states
We thank Maribeth Milner for creating the maps.
This research was funded by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Natural Resources Stewardship (EL-21) program, grant award W912HZ-12-1-0003.
- Bestelmeyer BT (2006) Restoration Ecology 14(3):325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00140.x, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.lib-ezproxy.tamu.edu:2048/doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00140.x/abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bestelmeyer BT, Herrick JE, Brown JR, Trujillo DA, Havstad KM (2004) Environmental Management 34(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4, http://link.springer.com.lib-ezproxy.tamu.edu:2048/article/10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE (2006) Rangel Ecol Manag 59(3):225. http://www.jstor.org.lib-ezproxy.tamu.edu:2048/stable/3899924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JM, Anthelme F (2008) J Ecol 96(1):18Google Scholar
- Comer P, Faber-Langendoen D, Evans R, Gawler S, Josse C, Kittel G, Menard S, Pyne M, Reid M, Schulz K (2003) Natureserve, Arlington VAGoogle Scholar
- Füssel HM (2010) Review and quantitative analysis of indices of climate change exposure, adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and impacts (Washington DC: World BankGoogle Scholar
- IPCC A (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis reportGoogle Scholar
- Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J (2007) In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (FAR) (Cambridge University Press), pp 589–662Google Scholar
- Stein BA, Scott C, Benton N (2008) BioScience. 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1641/B580409, bibtex[eprint=/oup/backfile/content_public/journal/bioscience/58/4/10.1641_b580409/4/58-4-339.pdf]
- Vincent CH, Hanson LA, Argueta CN (2017) Federal land ownership: overview and data. Congressional research, service report R42346Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Nemani R, Dieffenbach F, Stolte K, Holcomb G, Robinson M, Reese CC, Reese M, Duhaime R, Tierney G et al (2010) 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). (IEEE), pp 2095–2098Google Scholar
- Wuebbles D, Fahey D, Hibbard K, Dokken B, Stewart B, Maycock T (2017) In: Washington, DC, p 470Google Scholar