Climatic Change

, Volume 147, Issue 1–2, pp 11–21 | Cite as

Nitrogen pollution: a key building block for addressing climate change

  • David R. KanterEmail author


The current national commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement fall short of what is needed to stay below a 2 °C increase in global average temperature. One approach that has been proposed to close this ambition gap is the building blocks strategy, which aims to encourage initiatives focused on non-climate actions that can deliver a climate benefit. A key option under this framework is reducing global nitrogen pollution. Nitrogen pollution—driven largely by the inefficient use of synthetic fertilizer and manure—is one of the most important environmental issues of the twenty-first century, not least because of its climate impacts. Ambitiously mitigating nitrogen pollution could avoid greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 5–10% of the remaining allowable emissions consistent with the 2 °C target. However, the climate benefits would be a minor component of the overall environmental benefits of reducing nitrogen pollution, which would come mainly from avoided water and air pollution. The fact that these benefits would accrue mostly at local scales is especially important for countries like the United States, marked by a shift toward “economic nationalism.” In these countries, the most politically viable climate actions will likely be ones that produce local benefits as great, if not greater, than those achieved internationally. This is also likely to be true in countries like China, where local nitrogen-related issues such as air and water pollution remain major national priorities. Nevertheless, there are several challenges that could stand in the way of improved nitrogen management being a successful building block: integrated nitrogen management solutions that reduce the risk of pollution swapping need to be developed, the policy challenges related to changing and monitoring farmer behavior need to be addressed, and nitrogen’s role as an essential agricultural input needs to be respected. A better understanding of these challenges could also help policy-makers develop viable climate mitigation strategies across the entire agricultural sector.



I gratefully acknowledge the valuable comments provided by Michael Oppenheimer, Jessica Green, and Jonathan Hickman on earlier drafts of this paper, as well as comments from the participants in the SSRCdemocracy Working Group on Climate Change’s Workshop at Princeton University in November 2016. I would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and detailed comments.


  1. Abalos D, Jeffery S, Sanz-Cobena A, Guardia G, Vallejo A (2014) Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abalos D, Jeffery S, Drury CF, Wagner-Riddle C (2016) Improving fertilizer management in the U.S. and Canada for N2O mitigation: understanding potential positive and negative side-effects on corn yields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 221:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aillery M, Gollehon N, Johansson R, Kaplan J, Key N, Ribaudo M (2005) Managing manure to improve air and water quality. USDA Economic Research Service Economic Research Report 9Google Scholar
  4. Aunan K, Fang J, Vennemo H, Oye K, Seip HM (2004) Co-benefits of climate policy—lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China. Energy Policy 32:567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco G, Gerlagh R, Suh S, Barrett J, de Coninck HC, Diaz Morejon CF, Mathur R, Nakicenovic N, Ofosu Ahenkora A, Pan J, Pathak H, Rice J, Richels R, Smith SJ, Stern DI, Toth FL, Zhou P (2014) Drivers, trends and mitigation. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Brink C, van Grinsven H (2011) Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment. In: Sutton MA, Howard CM, Erisman JW, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P et al (eds) European nitrogen assessment. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Business Standard (2015) Govt allows 100% production of neem-coated urea. January 7, 2015Google Scholar
  8. Buzby JC, Wells HF, Bentley J (2013) ERS’s Food Loss Data Help Inform the Food Waste Discussion. Amber Waves, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Published June 3, 2013Google Scholar
  9. Climate Action Tracker (CAT) (2016). Effect of current pledges and policies on global temperature. Available at Accessed 8 May 2017
  10. Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA, Winiwarter W (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels Atmos. Chem Phys 8:389–395Google Scholar
  11. Davidson EA, Kanter D (2014) Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions. Environ Res Lett 9(10)Google Scholar
  12. Dodds WK, Bouska WW, Eitzmann JL, Pilger TP, Pitts KL, Riley AJ, Schloesser JT, Thornbrugh DJ (2009) Eutrophication of U.S. freshwaters: analysis of potential economic damages. Environ Sci Technol 43(1):12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Kanagawa, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. Erisman JW, Bleeker A, van Jaarsveld JA (1998) Evaluation of ammonia emission abatement on the basis of measurements and model calculations. Environ Pollut 102:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway JN, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W (2008) How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat Geosci 1:636–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erisman JW, Galloway JN, Seitzinger S, Bleeker A, Butterbach-Bahl K (2011) Reactive nitrogen in the environment and its effect on climate change. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(5):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) FAOSTAT. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. Galloway JN, Aber JD, Erisman JW, Seitzinger SP, Howarth RW, Cowling EB et al (2003) The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Government of India (2015) Neem Coated Urea. Budget Session. Lok Sahba, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu BJ, Ge Y, Ren Y, Xu B, Luo WD, Jiang H, Gu BH, Chang J (2012) Atmospheric reactive nitrogen in China: sources, recent trends, and damage costs. Environmental Science & Technology 46:9420–9427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harlan SL, Ruddell DM (2011) Climate change and health in cities: impacts of heat and air pollution and potential co-benefits from mitigation and adaptation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hefting MM, Bobbink R, de Caluwe H (2003) Nitrous oxide emission and denitrification in chronically nitrate-loaded riparian buffer zones. J Environ Qual 32(4):1194–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanter D, Mauzerall DL, Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW, Grabiel PM et al (2013) A post-Kyoto partner: considering the stratospheric ozone regime as a tool to manage nitrous oxide. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4451–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kanter DR, Zhang X, Mauzerall DL (2015) Reducing nitrogen pollution while decreasing farmers’ costs and increasing fertilizer industry profits. J Environ Qual 44:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanter DR, Wentz JA, Galloway JN, Moomaw WR, Winiwarter W (2017) Managing a forgotten greenhouse gas under existing U.S. law: an interdisciplinary analysis. Environ Sci Pol 67:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li C, Frolking S, Butterbach-Bahl K (2005) Carbon sequestration in arable soils is likely to increase nitrous oxide emissions, offsetting reductions in climate radiative forcing. Clim Chang 72:321–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A Shen J, Cui Z, Vitousek P, Erisman JW, Goudling K, Christie P, Fangmeier A, Zhang F (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. 494:459–462Google Scholar
  29. Melillo JM et al (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326:1397–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narayanan, N. (2013). Massive nitrogen pollution accompanies China’s growth. Scientific American. Published on February 27, 2013Google Scholar
  31. Nemet GF, Holloway T, Meier P (2010) Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ Res Lett 5Google Scholar
  32. Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW (2009) Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326:123–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Friedlingstein P, Gillett NP, van Vuuren DP, Riahi K, Allen M, Knutti R (2016) Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat Clim Chang 6:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schuur EAG, Bockheim J, Canadell JG, Euskirchen E, Field CB, Goryachkin SV, Hagemann S, Kuhry P, Lafleur PM, Lee H, Mazhitova G, Nelson FE, Rinke A, Romanovsky VE, Shiklomanov N, Tarnocai C, Venevsky S, Vogel JG, Zimov SA (2008) Vulnerability of permafrost to climate change: implications for the global carbon cycle. Bioscience 58(8):701–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinha E, Michalak AM, Balaji V (2017) Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes. Science 357:405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Haberl H, Harper R, House J, Jafari M, Masera O, Mbow C, Ravindranath NH, Rice CW, Robledo Abad C, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, Tubiello F (2014) Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Soussana, J.F., Saint-Macary, H., Chotte, J-L. (2015). Carbon sequestration in soils: the 4 per mil concept. Presentation to the “Agriculture and agricultural soils facing climate change and food security challenges: public policies and practices” workshop. September 16th, 2015. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  38. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart RB, Oppenheimer M, Rudyk B (2017) Building blocks: a strategy for near-tern action within the new global climate framework. Clim Chang.
  40. Stubbs M (2010) Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP): Status and Issues. Congressional Research Service. Washington D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Sutton MAB, Howard CM, Bekunda M, Grizzetti B, de Vries W, van Grinsven HJM, Abrol YP, Adhya TK, Billen G, Davidson EA, Datta A, Diaz R, Erisman JW, Liu XJ, Oenema O, Palm C, Raghuram N, Reis S, Scholz RW, Sims T, Westhoek H, Zhang FS (2013) Our nutrient world: the challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (Edinburgh) on behalf of the Global Partnership on Nutrient Management and the International Nitrogen InitiativeGoogle Scholar
  42. Sutton MA, Kanter DR, Howard C, Whalley P, Brownlie W (2016). Policy homes for nitrogen. INMS Project. GEF Full Size Project Document, Appendix 20Google Scholar
  43. Trenkel ME (2010) Slow- and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: an option for enhancing nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. International Fertilizer Industry Association, ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. UNEP (2013) Drawing down N2O to protect climate and the ozone layer: a UNEP synthesis report. United Nations Environment Programme Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  45. USDA (2015a) NRCS Conservation Programs: Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP).
  46. USDA (2015b) NRCS Conservation Programs: Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP).
  47. USDA (2016) USDA Building Blocks for Climate Smart Agriculture and Forestry. USDA. Washington D.C. USAGoogle Scholar
  48. USEPA (2008) Nitrogen backgrounder: challenges to nitrogen management. Washington D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  49. USEPA (2016) Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis—Under Exective Order 12866. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  50. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109(1–2):5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Velthof GL, Lesschen JP, Webb J, Pietrzak S, Miatkowski Z, Pinto M et al (2014) The impact of the nitrates directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008. Sci Total Environ 468:1225–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wellesley L, Happer C, Froggatt A (2015) Changing climate, changing diets. Chatham House Report. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Zaehle S, Ciais P, Friend AD, Prier V (2011) Carbon benefits of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen offset by nitrous oxide emissions. Nat Geosci 4:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y (2015) Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51–59Google Scholar
  55. Zhu ZL, Chen DL (2002) Nitrogen fertilizer use in China—contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 63(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations