Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Citizens show strong support for climate policy, but are they also willing to pay?

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To what extent citizens are willing not only to support ambitious climate policy but also willing to pay for such policy remains subject to debate. Our analysis addresses three issues in this regard: whether, as is widely assumed but not empirically established, willingness to support (WTS) is higher than willingness to pay (WTP); whether the determinants of the two are similar; and what accounts for within-subject similarity between WTS and WTP. We address these issues based on data from an original nationally representative survey (N = 2500) on forest conservation in Brazil, arguably the key climate policy issue in the country. The findings reveal that WTP is much lower than WTS. The determinants differ to some extent as well, regarding the effects of age, gender, and trust in government. The analysis also provides insights into factors influencing how much WTS and WTP line up within individuals, with respect to age, education, political ideology, salience of the deforestation issue, and trust in government. Our findings provide a more nuanced picture of how strong public support for climate change policy is and a starting point for more targeted climate policy communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldy JE, Kotchen MJ, Leiserowitz A (2012) Willingness to pay and political support for a US national clean energy standard. Nat Clim Chang 2(8):596–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel M, Scheve K (2013) Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(34):13763–13768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, McGrath L (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 6(7):680–683

  • Binstock RH, Quadagno J (2001) Aging and politics. In: Binstock RH, George LK (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 333–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin SR (2003) Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the US versus the world? Int J Sociol Soc Policy 23(10):106–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breffle WS, Eiswerth ME, Muralidharan D, Thornton J (2015) Understanding how income influences willingness to pay for joint programs: a more equitable value measure for the less wealthy. Ecol Econ 109:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer RL, Brander, Van Beukering P (2008) “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Clim Chang 90(3):299–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruderer E, Diekmann HA, Meyer R (2014) Subjective discount rates in the general population and their predictive power for energy saving behavior. Energ Policy 65:524–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürer MJ, Wüstenhagen R (2009) Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist’s best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors. Energ Policy 37(12):4997–5006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron TA (2005) Individual option prices for climate change mitigation. J Public Econ 89(2):283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson F, Martinsson P (2001) Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. J Environ Econ Manag 41:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond PA, Hausman JA (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J Econ Perspect 8(4):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich J, Goeschl T (2014) Willingness to pay for voluntary climate action and its determinants: field-experimental evidence. Environ Resour Econ 57(3):405–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann A, Preisendörfer P (2003) Green and greenback the behavioral rffects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Ration Soc 15(4):441–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I (2012) Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J Econ Psychol 33(1):264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drews S, Van den Bergh JC (2016) What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim Pol 16(7):855–876

  • Fairbrother M (2016) Trust and public support for environmental protection in diverse national contexts. Sociol Sci 3:359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gampfer R, Bernauer T, Kachi A (2014) Obtaining public support for north-south climate funding: evidence from conjoint experiments in donor countries. Glob Environ Chang 29:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebara MF, Fatorelli L, May P, Zhang S (2014) REDD+ policy networks in Brazil: constraints and opportunities for successful policy making. Ecol Soc 19(3):329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2013) The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: financial investment governance and public discourse. Environ Innov Soc Trans 6:67–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerres A (2008) The grey vote: determinants of older voters’ party choice in Britain and West Germany. Elect Stud 27(2):285–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15(3):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann WM (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect 8(4):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harring N, Jagers S (2013) Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability 5(1):210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R (1995) Public support for environmental protection: objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Pol Sci Polit 28(01):57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard M, Nyboer J, Bataille C, Sadownik B (2003) Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics. Energy J 24:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen JB, Hanley N (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation? Environ Resour Econ 43(2):137–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachi A, Bernauer T, Gampfer R (2015) Climate policy in hard times: are the pessimists, right? Ecol Econ 114:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane S, Shogren J (2000) Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy. Clim Chang 45(1):75–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen J, Boyle K, Leiserowitz A (2013) Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States Energy. Policy 55:617–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick JA, MacInnis B (2013) Does the American public support legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Daedalus 142(1):26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhjem H, Tuan T (2012) Valuation of species and nature conservation in Asia and Oceania: a meta-analysis. Environ Econ Policy Stud 14(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollum D, Krey V, Riahi K, Kolp P, Grubler A, Makowski M, Nakicenovic N (2013) Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges. Clim Chang 119(2):479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright A (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ 32(1):66–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet EC, Cooper KE, Garrett RK (2015) The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. ANNALS Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 658(1):36–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Am Econ Rev 105(4):1339–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2015) Pew global attitudes project. Available at http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change-Report-FINAL-November-5-2015.pdf. Accessed September 2017

  • Randall A, Stoll JR (1980) Consumer’s surplus in commodity space. Am Econ Rev 70(3):449–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan AM, Spash CL (2011) Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. J Econ Psychol 32(5):674–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Chang 22(2):505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seip K, Strand J (1992) Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: a contingent valuation study with real payment. Environ Resour Econ 2(1):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BD, Johnson NH (2009) Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol Econ 68(7):2137–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern NH, Peters S, Bakhshi V, Bowen A, Cameron C, Catovsky S, Crane D, Cruickshank S, Dietz S, Edmonson N, Garbett SL (2006) Stern review: the economics of climate change (Vol 30). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler C, Visschers VH, Siegrist M (2012) Addressing climate change: determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. J Environ Psychol 32(3):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK (2003) The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: how interest experience knowledge income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay. Ecol Econ 46(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor DG, House JC, Joy S (2005) A Madisonian approach to climate policy. Science 309(5742):1820–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JR, Carson RT, DeShazo JR, Schwabe KA, Ahmad I, Chong SK, Chang YT, Potts MD (2014) Tropical countries may be willing to pay more to protect their forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(28):10113–10118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J, Edwards T, Luckins K (2013) Post carbon pathways: towards a just and resilient post carbon future. Environ Innov Soc Trans 8:76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research for this article was funded by the ERC Advanced Grant “Sources of Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance” (Grant: 295456) and supported by ETH Zurich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Government Department, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO43SQ, UK

    Zorzeta Bakaki

  2. Center for Comparative and International Studies and Institute of Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Thomas Bernauer

Authors
  1. Zorzeta Bakaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Bernauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zorzeta Bakaki.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1497 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakaki, Z., Bernauer, T. Citizens show strong support for climate policy, but are they also willing to pay?. Climatic Change 145, 15–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2078-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2078-x

Search

Navigation