Climatic Change

, Volume 134, Issue 4, pp 521–531 | Cite as

Common human identity and the path to global climate justice

  • Gerhard ReeseEmail author


With the 2015 summit on global climate change in Paris, political action will (or will not) be taken to tackle the threats of the global climate crisis. Both social scientists as well as conservationists have come to the conclusion that human activity is one of the main reasons for climate change and nature degradation, and the main target of justice related mitigation and adaptation responses. This article puts human (in)activity into focus, and introduces a social identity perspective on environmental justice. Specifically, it shows how conservation scientists can draw from the idea of a common human identity (CHI). It delineates how the representation of a “common human ingroup” could inform beliefs about environmental justice, which in turn should motivate individuals and groups to act in favor of the natural environment. The review highlights that social identification with all humans may represent a potential path to global environmental justice, and combines recent insights from social identity research with conservation behavior.


Human identity Conservation Climate justice Environmental policy Social identity 


  1. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batalha L, Reynolds K (2012) ASPIRing to mitigate climate change: superordinate identity in global climate negotiations. Polit Psychol 743-760Google Scholar
  3. Becker JC, Enders-Comberg A, Wagner U, Christ O, Butz DA (2012) Beware of national symbols: how flags can threaten intergroup relations. Soc Psychol 43:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer MB (1991) The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 17:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchan NR, Brewer MB, Grimalda G, Wilson RK, Fatas E, Foddy M (2011) Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychol Sci 22:821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke MB, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema JA, Lobell DB (2009) Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(49):20670–20674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Lewis BP, Luce C, Neuberg SL (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman JS (1987) Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In: Alexander JC, Giesen B, Münch R, Smelser NJ (eds) The micro-macro link. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 153–176Google Scholar
  9. Clayton S, Koehn A, Grover E (2013) Making sense of the senseless: identity, justice, and the framing of environmental crises. Soc Justice Res 26:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain environmental attitudes and beliefs: how to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40:330–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Groot JIM, Steg L (2009) Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental Behavior? Conserv Lett 2:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggins RA, Haslam SA, Reynolds KJ (2002) Social identity and negotiation: subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 28:887–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franzen A, Vogl D (2013) Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1001–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser N (2009) Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritsche I, Cohrs JC, Kessler T, Bauer J (2012) Global warming is breeding social conflict: the subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. J Environ Psychol 32(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2005) Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: from aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. J Soc Issues 61:615–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2014) Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houlette MA, Gaertner SL, Johnson KM, Banker BS, Riek BM, Dovidio JF (2004) Developing a more inclusive social identity: an elementary school intervention. J Soc Issues 60:35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huo YJ, Smith HJ, Tyler TR, Lind A (1996) Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: is separatism the problem; is assimilation the Answer? Psychol Sci 7:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Available from
  22. Ituarte-Lima C, McDermott CL, Mulyani M (2014) Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD+: the case of Indonesia. Environ Sci Pol 44:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kals E, Russell Y (2001) Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining proenvironmental decision making. Soc Justice Res 14:367–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher SD (2005) Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 31:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR (2014) Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. J Nat Conserv 22:212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McFarland S, Webb M, Brown D (2012) All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity. J Pers Soc Psychol 103(5):830–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Opotow S (1990) Moral exclusion and injustice: an introduction. J Soc Issues 46:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Opotow S, Gerson J, Woodside S (2005) From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: theory for teaching peace. Theory Pract 44(4):303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reese G (2012) When authoritarians protect the earth – authoritarian submission and pro-environmental beliefs: a pilot study in Germany. Ecopsychology 4:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reese G and Jacob L (2015) Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: a two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environ Sci Pol 51:88–94Google Scholar
  31. Reese G, Kohlmann F (2015) Feeling global, acting ethically: global identification and fairtrade consumption. J Soc Psychol 155:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reese G, Berthold A, Steffens MC (2012) We are the world – and they are not: prototypicality for the world community, legitimacy, and responses to global inequality. Polit Psychol 33:683–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reese G, Proch J, Cohrs JC (2014) Individual differences in responses to global inequality. Analyses Soc Issues and Public Policy 14:217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reese G, Proch J, Finn C (2015) Identification with all humanity: the role of self-definition and self-investment. Eur J Soc Psychol 45:426–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reser, J.P., Morrissey, S.A., & Ellul, M. (2011). The threat of climate change: Psychological response, adaptation, and impacts. In Climate Change and Human Well-Being (pp. 19–42). Springer New York.Google Scholar
  36. Reysen S, Katzarska-Miller I (2013) A model of global citizenship: antecedents and outcomes. Int J Psychol 48:858–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riek BM, Mania EW, Gaertner SL, McDonald SA, Lamoreaux MJ (2010) Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Process and Intergroup Relat 13:404–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenmann A, Reese G, Cameron JE (2015) Social identities in a globalized world: challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological ScienceGoogle Scholar
  39. Santarius, T. (2009). Emissionshandel und globale gerechtigkeit [emissions trading and global justice]. In: S. Böhler, D. Bongardt, & S. Frech (Eds.): Jahrhundertproblem Klimawandel. Forschungsstand, Perspektiven, Lösungswege [climatic change as unprecedented problem: research, perspectives, solutions]. Schwalbach, S. 121–138.Google Scholar
  40. Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schubert R, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) Climate change as a security risk. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Shilling FM, London JK, Liévanos RS (2009) Marginalization by collaboration: environmental justice as a third party in and beyond CALFED. Environ Sci Pol 12:694–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sikor T, Martin A, Fisher J, He J (2014) Toward an empirical analysis of justice in ecosystem governance. Conserv Lett 7:524–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smeekes A, Verkuyten M (2013) Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(6):984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stern PC (2011) Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Swim J, Clayton S, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, Reser J, … Weber E (2009) Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change, American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. Syme GJ, Kals E, Nancarrow BE, Montada L (2000) Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: a cross-cultural model. Risk Anal 20(6):905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks Cole, Monterey, CA, pp. 33–47Google Scholar
  49. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker G (2012) Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Washburn J (1999) The negotiation of the Rome statute for the international criminal court and international law making in the 21 century. Pace Int Law Rev 11:361–377Google Scholar
  52. Watson JEM (2014) Human responses to climate change will seriously impact biodiversity conservation: it's time we start planning for them. Conserv Lett 7:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenzel M (2000) Justice and identity: the significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wenzel M (2004) A social categorization approach to distributive justice. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds) European review of social psychology, vol 15. Psychology Press, Hove, UK, pp. 219–257Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social PsychologyFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations