Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Challenges of climate change in tropical basins: vulnerability of eco-agrosystems and human populations

  • Pierre GirardEmail author
  • Jean-Philippe Boulanger
  • Craig Hutton
Article

Abstract

Climate change impacts are already happening through the world, and it is now clear that there is the need for an adaptive response from global institutions down to the local level. Reducing vulnerability to cope with climate variability might be more challenging in tropical countries than in North America or Europe. The ten papers of this special issue were presented during the Adaptclim conference that was held by the Sinergia Project, the CLARIS LPB project, and the GeoData Institute in Asunción, Paraguay, in 2010. All papers, except one regarding the Brahmaputra Basin in South Asia, present studies from South America. These studies are first contextualized geographically and then are related one to another by a simplified vulnerability concept linking climate stress to sensitivity and adaptive capacity of natural and human systems. One half of the papers focus on actual or future climate change and the present-day causes of the vulnerability of natural and agrosystems. Droughts are and will be the main source of stress for agriculture in South America. Increasing fragmentation of forest of the center of this continent is aggravating their vulnerability to dry spells. Another half of the studies of this special issue deal with the adaptive capacity human populations to system perturbations produced or enhanced by climate change. The studies point out inclusion of traditional knowledge and involvement of local actors in their own vulnerability assessment to increase adaptive capacity. These elements of climate justice, giving voice to those less responsible for carbon emissions but bearing their most severe consequences, allow the particular needs of a community to be considered and can direct adaptation policy toward preserving or rebuilding their specific capabilities under threat from climate change. The special issue also made clear that a basin analysis of the climate change problem could provide information, results, and methods more readily of use for the local population and decision makers.

Keywords

Adaptive Capacity Human Development Index Traditional Ecological Knowledge Institutional Response Climate Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the Pantanal Research Center (CPP), the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCT&I), and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq), as well as Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, WWF-Brazil, and TNC for supporting the Sinergia project and the Adpatclim conference. Special thanks are addressed to Institut de Recherche pour le Développement for supporting Dr. Jean-Philippe Boulanger’s investigations from 2007 to March 2013. We also wish to thank the BRAHMATWINN project lead by Prof. Wolfgang Flugel of FSU, Germany for the Brahmaputra Basin component of the project.

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assad ED, Pinto HS (2008) Aquecimento global e cenários futuros da agricultura brasileira. EMBRAPA/UNICAMP, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlas de Desenvolvimento humano do Brasil (2014) Atlas de Desenvolvimento humano do Brasil. http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/en/. Accesses 11 April 2014
  5. Beddington J, Asaduzzaman M, Clark M, Fernández A, Guillou M, Jahn M, Erda L, Mamo T, Van Bo N, Nobre CA, Scholes R, Sharma R, Wakhungu J (2012) Achieving food security in the face of climate change: final report from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulanger J-P, Schlindwein S, Gentile E (2011) Metamorphosis of the CLARIS LPB European project: from a mechanistic to a systemic approach. CLIVAR Exchanges. Spec Issue LPB 57:7–10Google Scholar
  7. Bravo JM, Collischonn W, Paz AR, Allasia D, Domecq F (2013) Impact of projected climate change on hydrologic regime of the Upper Paraguay River basin. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0816-2 Google Scholar
  8. Brydon-Miller M, Greenwood D, Maguire P (2003) Why action-research. Action Res 1:9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton I (1997) Vulnerability and adaptive response in the context of climate and climate change. Clim Chang 36:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Schipper EL (2002) From impact assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Clim Pol 2:145–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CEPED (2012). Centro Universitário de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Desastres, CEPED. Atlas brasileiro de desastres naturais 1991 a 2010: volume Brasil. Florianópolis: CEPED UFSC. Volume Brasil. ISBN 978-85-64695-08-5Google Scholar
  12. Confalonieri UEC, Lima ACL, Brito I, Quintão AF (2013) Social, environmental and health vulnerability to climate change in the Brazilian Northeastern Region. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0811-7 Google Scholar
  13. Costello A, Abbas M et al (2009) Managing the health eff ects of climate change. Lancet 373:1693–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Da Silva CJ, Albernaz-Silveira, R, Nogueira, PS (2014) Perception on climate change of the traditional community Cuiabá Mirim, Pantanal Wetland, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Clim Chang. doi:  10.1007/s10584-014-1150-z
  15. Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber G, Malilay J, McGeehin M (2008) Climate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health 98:435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75:301–29. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geological Survey of India (2009) Geology and mineral resources of Assam. Geological Survey, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Godfray C, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines A, Kovats RS, Campbell-Lendrum D, Corvalan C (2006) Climate change and human health: impacts, vulnerability, and mitigation. Lancet 367:2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heltberg R, Siegel PB, Jorgensen SL (2009) Addressing human vulnerability to climate change: toward a ‘no-regrets’ approach. Glob Environ Chang 19:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IBGE (2012) Contas Regionais do Brasil 2010. IBGE. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  22. Institute of Applied Manpower Research (2011) India Human Development Report 2011. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Ioris AA, Irigaray CT, Girard P (2014) Institutional responses to climate change: opportunities and barriers for adaptation in the Pantanal and the Upper Paraguay River Basin. Clim Chang. doi:  10.1007/s10584-014-1134-z
  24. IPCC (2012) Summary for Policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds.) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–19Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Annex I: Atlas of Global and Regional Climate Projections. In: van Oldenborgh GJ, Collins M, Arblaster J, Christensen JH, Marotzke J, Power SB, Rummukainen M, Zhou T, Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2014) Chapter 27: Central and South America [Magrin, G. and Marengo, J] In: Climate change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contributions of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCCGoogle Scholar
  27. Jain SK, Kumar V, Saharia M (2012) Analysis of rainfall and temperature trends in northeast India. Int J Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.3483 Google Scholar
  28. Johnson FA, Hutton CW (2012) Dependence on agriculture and ecosystem services for livelihood in Northeast India and Bhutan: vulnerability to climate change in the Tropical River Basins of the Upper Brahmaputra. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0573-7 Google Scholar
  29. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Chang 47:325–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindoso DP, Rocha JD, Debortoli N, Parente II, Eiró F, Bursztyn M, Rodrigues-Filho S (2014) Integrated assessment of smallholder farming’s vulnerability to drought in the Brazilian Semi-arid: a case study in Ceará. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1116-1 Google Scholar
  31. Mayaux P, Holmgren P, Achard F, Eva H, Stibig H-J, Branthomme A (2005) Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1454):373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mooney H, Larigauderie A, Cesario M, Elmquist T, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Lavorel S, Mace GM, Palmer M, Scholes R, Yahara T (2009) Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NASA (2014) Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center. Gridded population of the world. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v3. Accessed 11 April 2014.
  34. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolden A, Nygaard L (2004) What’s in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO Working Paper 2004:04. 16pGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Pol 7:73–88. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinto-Ledezma JN, Mamani MLR (2013) Temporal patterns of deforestation and fragmentation in lowland Bolivia: implications for climate change. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0817-1 Google Scholar
  37. Revi A (2008) Climate change risk: an adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities. Environ Urban Int Ins Environ Dev (IIED). doi: 10.1177/0956247808089157 Google Scholar
  38. Ribot J (1995) The causal structure of vulnerability: its application to climate impact analysis. GeoJournal 35:119–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ribot J (2010) Vulnerability does not fall from the sky: toward multiscale, pro-poor climate policy. In: Mearns R, Norton A (eds) Social dimensions of climate change: equity and vulnerability in a warming world. The World Bank, Washington D.C., pp 47–74. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7887-8 Google Scholar
  40. Ribot J, Magalhães AR, Panagides SS (1996) Climate change, climate variability, and social vulnerability in the semi-arid tropics. University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salati E, Salati E, Campanhol T, Villa Nova N (2007) Tendências de Variações Climáticas para o Brasil no Século XX e Balanços Hídricos para Cenários Climáticos para o Século XXI. FBDS, Rio de Janeiro, ESALQ, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  42. The Economist (2014) Comparing Indian states and territories with countries. An Indian summary. Which countries match the GDP and population of India’s states and territories? http://www.economist.com/content/indian-summary. Accessed 11 April 2014.
  43. Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner BLII, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda G, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Luers A, Martello ML, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003) Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8080–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner WR, Bradley BA, Estes LD, Hole DG, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS (2010) Climate change: helping nature survive the human response. Conserv Lett 3:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. UNDP (2013) Human development report 2013. United Nations Development Program, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Vasconcelos ACF, Schlindwein SL, Lana MA, Fantini AC, Bonatti M, D’Agostini LR, Martins SR (2014) Land use dynamics in Brazilian La Plata Basin and anthropogenic climate change. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1081-8 Google Scholar
  48. World Bank (2014a) Data. http://data.worldbank.org . Accessed 14 April 2014
  49. World Bank (2014b) Climate change knowledge portal. http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm. Accessed 14 April 2014

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Girard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Philippe Boulanger
    • 2
  • Craig Hutton
    • 3
  1. 1.Federal University of Mato Grosso-Brazil and Pantanal Research Center (CPP)Campo GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.ECOCLIMASOL, Climate Risk Management SolutionsParisFrance
  3. 3.GeoData Institute, Geography and Environment Academic UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations