Climatic Change

, Volume 126, Issue 1–2, pp 229–243 | Cite as

The effect of health benefits on climate change mitigation policies

  • Masako Ikefuji
  • Jan R. Magnus
  • Hiroaki SakamotoEmail author


This paper studies the interplay between climate, health, and the economy in a stylized world with eleven heterogeneous regions, with special emphasis on USA, Europe, China, India, and Africa. We introduce health impacts into a simple economic integrated assessment model where both the local cooling effect of SO 2 and the global warming effect of CO 2 are endogenous, and investigate how these factors affect the equilibrium path. Regions do not respond in the same way to climate change. In particular, emission abatement rates and health costs depend on the economic and geographical characteristics of each region. Two policy scenarios are considered, Nash and Optimal, for which we present both global and regional results. Results for Africa and China are highlighted.


Climate change Air pollution Local dimming Health Economic growth 



We are grateful to conference participants at the Monte Verità Conference on Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics (SURED), Ascona, Switzerland, June 2010, and the Fourth World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists (WCERE), Montréal, Canada, June-July 2010; to seminar participants at Wageningen University, Oxford University, the LSE, and Hiroshima University; and to an associate editor and five referees for helpful and constructive comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Nos. 22530177 (Ikefuji) and 18078001 (Sakamoto). E-mail addresses: (Ikefuji), (Magnus), (Sakamoto).

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1204_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (467 kb)
(PDF 467 KB)


  1. Bahn O, Leach A (2008) The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: An overlapping generations approach. CMS 5:233–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollen J, van der Zwaan B, Brink C, Eerens H (2009a) Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis. Resour Energy Econ 31:161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollen J, Brink C, Eerens H, Manders A (2009b) Co-benefits of Climate Policy, PBL Report No. 500116005, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  4. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) (2002) Country-level GDP and Downscaled Projections Based on the A1, A2, B1, and B2 Marker Scenarios, pp 1990–2100. Columbia University, New York. Google Scholar
  5. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) (2005) Gridded Population of the World, version 3. Columbia University, NY. Google Scholar
  6. Cifuentes L, Borja-Aburto VH, Gouveia N, Thurston G, Davis DL (2001) Climate change: Hidden health benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation. Science 293(5533):1257–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ebi KL (2008a) Using health models to prepare for and cope with climate change. Clim Chang 88:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebi KL (2008b) Healthy people 2100: modeling population health impacts of climate change. Clim Chang 88:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2004) Air Pollution and Climate Change Policies in Europe: Exploring Linkages and the Added Value of an Integrated Approach, Technical Report No. 5, EEA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  10. Ikefuji M, Magnus JR, Sakamoto H (2014) The effect of health benefits on climate change mitigation policies: background document.
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) IPCC Special Report: Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kovats RS, Ebi KL, Menne B (2003) Methods for Assessing Human Health Vulnerability and Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change, WHO, Health Canada/UNEPGoogle Scholar
  14. Magnus JR, Melenberg B, Muris C (2011) Global warming and local dimming: The statistical evidence (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 106:452–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manne A, Richels R (1995) The greenhouse debate: Economic efficiency, burden sharing and hedging strategies. Energy J 16:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McMichael AJ, Campbell-Lendrum D, Kovats S, Edwards S, Wilkinson P, Wilson T, Nicholls R, Hales S, Tanser F, Sueur D L, Schlesinger M, Andronova N (2004) Global climate change. In: Ezzati M., Lopez A., Rodgers A., Murray C. (eds) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Due to Selected Major Risk Factors. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 1543–1649Google Scholar
  17. Nordhaus WD (2008) A Question of Balance: Weighting the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  18. Nordhaus WD (2010) Economic aspects of global warming in a post Copenhagen environment. In: Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, vol 107Google Scholar
  19. Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am Econ Rev 86:741–765Google Scholar
  20. Sankovski A (1998) Greenhouse Gas Emission Scenario Database, version 5.0, EPA 98 Emission Scenario, National Institute of Environmental Studies, Japan.
  21. Schlesinger ME, Malyshev S, Rozanov EV, Yang F, Andronova NG, de Varies B, Grübler A, Jiang K, Masui T, Morita T, Penner J, Pepper W, Sankovski A, Zhang Y (2000) Geographical distributions of temperature change for scenarios of greenhouse gas and sulfur dioxide emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 65:167–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spadaro JV, Rabl A (1999) Estimates of real damage from air pollution: Site dependence and simple impact indices for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Swart R, Amann M, Raes F, Tuinstra W (2004) A good climate for clean air: Linkages between climate change and air pollution. Clim Chang 66:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations (2010) World Urbanization Prospects, the 2009 Revision, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, NY.
  25. Vautard R, Yiou P, van Oldenborgh GJ (2009) Decline of fog, mist and haze in Europe over the past 30 years. Nat Geosci 2:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang K, Dickinson RE, Liang S (2009) Clear sky visibility has decreased over land globally from 1973 to 2007. Science 323:1468–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wild M, Trüssel B, Ohmura A, Long CN, König-Langlo G, Dutton EG, Tsvetkov A (2009) Global dimming and brightening: An update beyond 2000. J Geophys Res 114:D00D13. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011382 Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) The World Health Report 2003. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. World Health Organization, Geneva. data available at Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masako Ikefuji
    • 1
  • Jan R. Magnus
    • 2
  • Hiroaki Sakamoto
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Business EconomicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkEsbjergDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Econometrics & Operations ResearchVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  3. 3.School of Social SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations