Quality of social interaction in foster dyads at child age 2 and 3 years
The main aim of this study was to investigate the quality of social interaction between 60 foster parents and their foster children compared to a group of 55 non-foster families at 2 (T1) and again at 3 (T2) years of age. Video observations were used to investigate child–parent interaction at both time-points. “This is My Baby” interview was administered to investigate foster parents’ commitment at T1. The main results revealed significant group differences at T1 on all child–parent social interaction measures, although not at T2. Further, a significant group by time interaction was identified for parental sensitivity, revealing a positive development over time in the foster group. Finally, a significant positive relation was found between commitment at T1 and parental sensitivity. The results convey an optimistic view of the possibilities for foster dyads to develop positive patterns of social interaction over time.
KeywordsFoster care Child–parent interaction Sensitivity Commitment
We thank all the children and families who took part in this study.
This project has been financially supported by the National Network for Infant Mental Health, Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway; the Norwegian Extra Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation through EXTRA funds (Grant Number: 2010/FOM9392), as well as funds from the Ministry of Children and Equality.
Compliance with ethical standards
I This study was approved by the National Committees for Research Ethics and Norwegian Centre for Research Data.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants (caregivers and child protection services) included in the study.
- 6.Lehmann S, Havik OE, Havik T, Heiervang E (2013) Mental disorders in foster children: a study of prevalence, comorbidity and risk factors. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 7(39)Google Scholar
- 12.Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 15.Olson SL, Lunkenheimer ES (2009) Expanding concepts of self-regulation to social relationships: transactional processes in the development of early behavioral adjustment. In: The transactional model of development: how children and contexts shape each other. American Psychological Association; US, Washington, DC, pp 55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Powell B, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Marvin R (2014) The CIrcle of security intervention: enhancing attachment in early parent-child relationships. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Numan M, Insel TR (2003) The neurobiology of parental behavior. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Stern DN (1985) The interpersonal world of the infant: a view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Chernoff R, Combs-Orme T, Risley-Curtiss C, Heisler A (1994) Assessing the health status of children entering foster care. Pediatrics 93(4):594–601Google Scholar
- 24.Dozier M, Bick J (2007) Changing caregivers: coping with early adversity. Psychiatry Ann 37(6):411–415Google Scholar
- 28.Bowlby J (1988) A secure base: parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 34.Owen MT, Amos M, Bondurant L, Caughy M, Hazanizadeh N, Hurst J et al (2011) Qualitative ratings for parent-child interaction ages 2–4 years. Five point scalesGoogle Scholar
- 35.Caron EB, Bernard K, Dozier M (2016) In vivo feedback predicts parent behavior change in the attachment and biobehavioral catch-up intervention. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol:1–12Google Scholar
- 39.Haus I (2005) PRIDE. Et utvelgelses- og opplæringsprogram for fosterforeldre [PRIDE. A selection and training programme for foster parents]. In: Schjelderup LE, Omre C, Marthinsen E (eds) Nye metoder i et moderne barnevern [New methods in a modern child welfare]. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, pp 248–267Google Scholar
- 42.Owen MT, Ware AM, Barfoot B (2005) Caregiver-mother partnership behavior and the quality of caregiver-child and mother-child interactions. In: Child care and child development: results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Guilford Press; US, New York, pp 224–230Google Scholar
- 43.NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (1998) Early child care and self-control, compliance, and problem behavior at twenty-four and thirty-six months. Child Dev 69(4):1145–1170Google Scholar
- 45.Bates BC, Dozier M. “This Is My Baby” coding manual. [Unpublished manuscript]. In press 1998Google Scholar