Distribution of CR1-like transposable element in woodpeckers (Aves Piciformes): Z sex chromosomes can act as a refuge for transposable elements
Birds have relatively few repetitive sequences compared to other groups of vertebrates; however, the members of order Piciformes (woodpeckers) have more of these sequences, composed mainly of transposable elements (TE). The TE most often found in birds is a retrotransposon chicken repeat 1 (CR1). Piciformes lineages were subjected to an expansion of the CR1 elements, carrying a larger fraction of transposable elements. This study compared patterns of chromosome distribution among five bird species, through chromosome mapping of the CR1 sequence and reconstructed their phylogenetic tree. We analyzed several members of Piciformes (Colaptes campestris, Colaptes melanochloros, Melanerpes candidus, and Veniliornis spilogaster), as well as Galliformes (Gallus gallus). Gallus gallus is the species with which most genomic and hence cytogenetic studies have been performed. The results showed that CR1 sequences are a monophyletic group and do not depend on their hosts. All species analyzed showed a hybridization signal by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In all species, the chromosomal distribution of CR1 was not restricted to heterochromatin regions in the macrochromosomes, principally pair 1 and the Z sex chromosome. Accumulation in the Z sex chromosomes can serve as a refuge for transposable elements. These results highlight the importance of transposable elements in host genomes and karyotype evolution.
KeywordsRetrotransposon Birds Genomes Genome organization FISH Sex chromosomes
Chicken repeat 1
Fluorescent in situ hybridization
Long interspersed nucleotide elements
Open reading frames
Polymerase chain reaction
The authors are grateful to Dr. Rafael Kretschmer for his inspiring comments on the manuscript and to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to improve the manuscript.
NAB and TDO conceived, designed research most of the experiments and contributed to the interpretation of results. NAB and TDO wrote the manuscript. NAB and RLBC did the in silico experiments. AVG and FPT supervised the project. NAB, TDO, RJG, AVG, CM and FPT performed research. NAB and TDO contributed equal. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) provided financial support.
Compliance with ethical standards
The experiments followed protocols approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA – Universidade Federal do Pampa, 026/2012).
- de Oliveira TD, Kretschmer R, Bertocchi NA, Degrandi TM, de Oliveira EHC, Cioffi MB, Garnero AV, Gunski RJ (2017) Genomic organization of repetitive DNA in woodpeckers (Aves, Piciformes): implications for karyotype and ZW sex chromosome differentiation. PLoS One 12:e0169987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169987 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Garnero ADV, Gunski RJ (2000) Comparative analysis of the karyotypes of Nothura maculosa and Rynchotus rufescens (Aves, Tinamidae). A case of chromosomal polymorphism. Nucl 43:64–70Google Scholar
- Green RE, Braun EL, Armstrong J, Earl D, Nguyen N, Hickey G, Vandewege MW, St. John JA, Capella-Gutierrez S, Castoe TA, Kern C, Fujita MK, Opazo JC, Jurka J, Kojima KK, Caballero J, Hubley RM, Smit AF, Platt RN, Lavoie CA, Ramakodi MP, Finger JW, Suh A, Isberg SR, Miles L, Chong AY, Jaratlerdsiri W, Gongora J, Moran C, Iriarte A, McCormack J, Burgess SC, Edwards SV, Lyons E, Williams C, Breen M, Howard JT, Gresham CR, Peterson DG, Schmitz J, Pollock DD, Haussler D, Triplett EW, Zhang G, Irie N, Jarvis ED, Brochu CA, Schmidt CJ, McCarthy FM, Faircloth BC, Hoffmann FG, Glenn TC, Gabaldon T, Paten B, Ray DA (2014) Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs. Science 346(80):1254449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254449 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Matsubara K, Meally DO, Azad B, et al (2016) Amplification of microsatellite repeat motifs is associated with the evolutionary differentiation and heterochromatinization of sex chromosomes in Sauropsida. 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-015-0531-z
- Shibusawa M, Nishibori M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y (2004) Karyotypic evolution in the Galliformes: an examination of the process of karyotypic evolution by comparison of the molecular cytogenetic findings with the molecular phylogeny. Cytogenet Genome Res 106:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000078570 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suh A, Churakov G, Ramakodi MP, Platt RN II, Jurka J, Kojima KK, Caballero J, Smit AF, Vliet KA, Hoffmann FG, Brosius J, Green RE, Braun EL, Ray DA, Schmitz J (2014) Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes. Genome Biol Evol 7:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu256 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Supiwong W, Liehr T, Cioffi MB, Chaveerach A, Kosyakova N, Pinthong K, Tanee T, Tanomtong A (2013) Karyotype and cytogenetic mapping of 9 classes of repetitive DNAs in the genome of the naked catfish Mystus bocourti (Siluriformes, Bagridae). Mol Cytogenet 6:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-51 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wicker T, Robertson JS, Schulze SR, et al (2005) The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2438005
- Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, Lee C, Storz JF, Antunes A, Greenwold MJ, Meredith RW, Odeen A, Cui J, Zhou Q, Xu L, Pan H, Wang Z, Jin L, Zhang P, Hu H, Yang W, Hu J, Xiao J, Yang Z, Liu Y, Xie Q, Yu H, Lian J, Wen P, Zhang F, Li H, Zeng Y, Xiong Z, Liu S, Zhou L, Huang Z, An N, Wang J, Zheng Q, Xiong Y, Wang G, Wang B, Wang J, Fan Y, da Fonseca RR, Alfaro-Nunez A, Schubert M, Orlando L, Mourier T, Howard JT, Ganapathy G, Pfenning A, Whitney O, Rivas MV, Hara E, Smith J, Farre M, Narayan J, Slavov G, Romanov MN, Borges R, Machado JP, Khan I, Springer MS, Gatesy J, Hoffmann FG, Opazo JC, Hastad O, Sawyer RH, Kim H, Kim KW, Kim HJ, Cho S, Li N, Huang Y, Bruford MW, Zhan X, Dixon A, Bertelsen MF, Derryberry E, Warren W, Wilson RK, Li S, Ray DA, Green RE, O'Brien SJ, Griffin D, Johnson WE, Haussler D, Ryder OA, Willerslev E, Graves GR, Alstrom P, Fjeldsa J, Mindell DP, Edwards SV, Braun EL, Rahbek C, Burt DW, Houde P, Zhang Y, Yang H, Wang J, Avian Genome Consortium, Jarvis ED, Gilbert MTP, Wang J, Ye C, Liang S, Yan Z, Zepeda ML, Campos PF, Velazquez AMV, Samaniego JA, Avila-Arcos M, Martin MD, Barnett R, Ribeiro AM, Mello CV, Lovell PV, Almeida D, Maldonado E, Pereira J, Sunagar K, Philip S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Bunce M, Lambert D, Brumfield RT, Sheldon FH, Holmes EC, Gardner PP, Steeves TE, Stadler PF, Burge SW, Lyons E, Smith J, McCarthy F, Pitel F, Rhoads D, Froman DP (2014) Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 346(80):1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251385 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar