Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Development of sustainable and cost efficient textile foam-finishing and its comparison with conventional padding

Abstract

Conventional padding is a non-sustainable textile processing technique, which consumes excessive water, chemicals and energy. To support the survival of the textile processing industry, researchers have identified the foam technology for application of dyes and finishes. Foam technology is more ecofriendly than the conventional padding. However, the successful foam generation for different finishes is a challenging task. In addition, it is more difficult and complicated task to effectively apply the foam on the fabrics and get the results which should be comparable with the conventional padding. This paper compares the pad-finishing with foam-finishing on the basis of sustainability, cost, productivity, and performance using 11 different non-toxic and sustainable finishes including cross-linkers, oil and water repellents, softeners, and fire retardant on the cotton fabric samples. Cost, productivity, performance and sustainability were estimated through the specific methods. The paper organizes the problem as analytic hierarchy process model and solves the model using super decisions software. The results reveal that the foam-finishing technique is more preferable in terms of cost, productivity and sustainability, if optimized properly. In addition, the successful foam-finishing recipes have been generated and the performance of foam-finishing has been comparable with pad-finishing. For instance, if all the criteria were given the same priority, the foam-finishing recipe with less quantity of chemical was 84.61% better than the pad-finishing. The optimized foam-finishing recipe was 84.55% better than the pad-finishing. In addition, the optimized foam-finishing recipe indicated better finishing performance in term of some important tests as compared to padding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Bhavsar PS, Zoccola M, Patrucco A, Montarsolo A, Mossotti R, Giansetti M, Rovero G, Maier SS, Muresan A, Tonin C (2017) Superheated water hydrolyzed keratin: a new application as a foaming agent in foam dyeing of cotton and wool fabrics. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9150–9159

  2. Bryant GM (1984) Dynamic sorption of semistable foams by fabrics: Part I: implications for textile foam application processes. Text Res J 54:217–226

  3. Chen S, Wang C, Fei L, Liu H (2017) A novel strategy for realising environmentally friendly pigment foam dyeing using polyoxyethylene ether surfactant C14 EO5 as a foam controller. Color Technol 133:253–261

  4. Elbadawi AM, Pearson JS (2003) Foam technology in textile finishing. Text Prog 33:1–31

  5. Gonzales EJ, Reinhardt RM (1986) Foam finishing treatment of cotton fabrics with formaldehyde part I: textile physical properties 1. Text Res J 56:497–502

  6. Gopalakrishnan M, Punitha V, Saravanan D (2019) Water conservation in textile wet processing. In: Muthu SS (ed) Water in textiles and fashion. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 135–153

  7. Gregorian RS, Namboodri CG, Young RE, Baitinger WF (1983) Foam application of phosphonium salt flame retardants. Text Res J 53:148–152

  8. Hou Q, Wang X (2017) The effect of PVA foaming characteristics on foam forming. Cellulose 24:4939–4948

  9. Jokisch S, Scheibel T (2017) Spider silk foam coating of fabric. Pure Appl Chem 89:1769–1776

  10. Kumar PS, Yaashikaa PR (2018) Sustainable dyeing techniques. In: Muthu SS (ed) Sustainable innovations in textile chemical processes. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–29

  11. Li K, Zhang, JF, Li QJ (2011) Study on foaming properties of sodium dodecyl sulfate for textile foam dyeing and finishing. In: Qian X, Liu H (eds) Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publication, vol 332–334, pp 1515–1519

  12. Li K, Zhang J, Gong J (2014) Wrinkle-resistant finish of foam technology for cotton fabric. J Ind Text 43:525–535

  13. Liu Y, Xin JH, Choi CH (2012) Cotton fabrics with single-faced superhydrophobicity. Langmuir 28:17426–17434

  14. Mohsin M, Sardar S (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis for textile pad-dyeing and foam-dyeing based on cost, performance, productivity and sustainability. Cellulose 26:4143–4157

  15. Mu E, Pereyra-Rojas M (2016) Practical decision making: an introduction to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using super decisions. Springer, Berlin

  16. Palamutcu S (2017) Sustainable textile technologies. In: Muthu SS (ed) Textiles and clothing sustainability. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–22

  17. Qutab HG, Mohsin M, Ramzan N, Ahmmad SW (2019) Performance enhancement of diammonium hydrogen phosphate as halogen and formaldehyde free sustainable fire retardant. Ind Text 70:366–373

  18. Rather LJ, Jameel S, Dar OA, Ganie SA, Bhat KA, Mohammad F (2019) Advances in the sustainable technologies for water conservation in textile industries. In: Muthu SS (ed) Water in textiles and fashion. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 175–194

  19. Rowland SP, Bertoniere NR, King WD (1983) Durable press performance and reagent distribution from foam application of DMDHEU. Text Res J 53:197–204

  20. Samanta KK, Pandit P, Samanta P, Basak S (2019) Water consumption in textile processing and sustainable approaches for its conservation. In: Muthu SS (ed) Water in textiles and fashion. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 41–59

  21. Sarwar N, Mohsin M, Bhatti AA, Ahmmad SW, Husaain A (2017) Development of water and energy efficient environment friendly easy care finishing by foam coating on stretch denim fabric. J Clean Prod 154:159–166

  22. Song MS, Hou JB, Lu YH, Lin J, Cheng DH (2013) Performance of foam and application in foam finishing of textile. In: Zheng L, Kuroda S, Liu H, Du B, Wei J, Zhao Y (eds) Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications, vol 821–822, pp 661–664

  23. Tang AY, Lee CH, Wang YM, Kan CW (2019) Dyeing cotton with reactive dyes: a comparison between conventional water-based and solvent-assisted PEG-based reverse micellar dyeing systems. Cellulose 26:1399–1408

  24. Van der Walt GHJ, Van Rensburg NJJ (1986) Low-liquor dyeing and finishing. Text Prog 14:1–50

  25. Wadsworth LC, Wey PS (1988) Effects of differential foam application of durable press and fluorochemical finishes to cotton fabric. J Ind Text 17:152–166

  26. Yang CQ, Perenich TA, Fateley WG (1989) Studies of foam finished cotton fabrics using FT-IR photoacoustic spectroscopy. Text Res J 59:562–568

  27. Yu H, Wang Y, Zhong Y, Mao Z, Tan S (2014) Foam properties and application in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes. Color Technol 130:266–272

  28. Zhou L, Bai Y, Zhou H, Guo S (2019) Environmentally friendly textile production: continuous pretreatment of knitted cotton fabric with normal temperature plasma and padding. Cellulose 26:6943–6958

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by UET Lahore (Grant No. 21-1301/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2017).

Author information

Correspondence to Muhammad Mohsin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohsin, M., Sardar, S. Development of sustainable and cost efficient textile foam-finishing and its comparison with conventional padding. Cellulose (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03033-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Padding
  • Foam coating
  • Analytic hierarchy process
  • Textile finishing
  • Sustainable processing